Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.25121629 [View]
File: 61 KB, 1826x1006, chainlink token distribution.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
25121629

>>25121592
>selling under the table and never announcing it for years
This was announced before the ICO.
See pic.

>using paid promoters, shills for years on biz, etc
>manufacturing bullshit memes that you're some faggot fatass messiah
>constantly espousing 1000 EOY, now it's gonna come to bite
Yes anon, I'm sure Sergey is legally culpable for what 4chadditors post lmao

>> No.24662610 [View]
File: 61 KB, 1826x1006, 1607423934133.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
24662610

>>24661670
Was always the plan. Get the network going and rule the world. Sergey Nazarov is a genius.

>> No.24641660 [View]
File: 61 KB, 1826x1006, chainlink token distribution.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
24641660

>>24641644
>the prospect of the team dumping 600 million tokens on the public is just too much for the market to accept
Pic is from before the ICO.
The token "dumps" were priced in from the very beginning.

>> No.22881715 [View]
File: 61 KB, 1826x1006, chainlink ico token distribution use.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
22881715

>>22881230
>>22881463
Imagine being too new to remember this chart from before the ICO.

>> No.22742551 [View]
File: 61 KB, 1826x1006, chainlink ico token distribution use.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
22742551

>>22741292
>>22741384
>>22741450
lmao, calm down.
Sergey told us he'd be selling tokens before the ICO even happened.
Try not to be THIS much of a raging newfag please.

>> No.21714132 [View]
File: 61 KB, 1826x1006, chainlink ico token distribution use.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
21714132

>>21714041
Pic related is from before the ICO.
It helps when you're not a raging newfag.

>> No.21703259 [View]
File: 61 KB, 1826x1006, chainlink ico token distribution use.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
21703259

>>21703216
>The only reason it's a very small portion is because he controls 60% of total supply
You do realize this was known BEFORE the ICO, right nufag?

>> No.21415854 [View]
File: 61 KB, 1826x1006, E71AE53F-C161-4911-A8DF-3C5088F5B0D8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
21415854

>30% of tokens are for dumping on newfags
how do I even cope. in 2 days, all these paper gains will be erased, and this erc34 cayman oracle token will bleed its way back to .10c, won’t it.

>> No.21403352 [View]
File: 61 KB, 1826x1006, chainlink ico token distribution use.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
21403352

>>21403250
>why was this never spoken about by the link holders?
Because this hasn't been news since the ICO three years ago lol.

>> No.21252742 [View]
File: 61 KB, 1826x1006, ICO Token-Sale-Terms-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
21252742

>>21252106
2017 marine here, we've talked about this but I'll spoon feed you nu-linkers.
The 35% incentive pool will be the most important aspect of the tokenomics as it'll be the "baseline interest rate" for link. Sergey will determine the emission schedule but nobody knows the exact number yet.
What we know is that link being a demand based staking and not your regular block time based staking out there makes the annual return hard to predict. Also link lending will be competing with baseline interest rate so it'll be a highly complex game.

And no linkpool isn't the only NEET staking pool.

>> No.19872919 [View]
File: 61 KB, 1826x1006, Token-Sale-Terms-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
19872919

>>19872760
It's a valid argument, the demand side problem.
That's why 35% of the tokens were reserved as incentive for node operators.

>> No.19710547 [View]
File: 61 KB, 1826x1006, chainlink token distribution.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
19710547

>>19706872
>No one can get an explanation

>> No.19403005 [View]
File: 61 KB, 1826x1006, chainlink ico token distribution use.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
19403005

>>19402634
>>19402722
There's nothing to justify, this was explained to us years ago, before a single person bought a single token.

>> No.19105610 [View]
File: 61 KB, 1826x1006, chainlink ico token distribution use.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
19105610

Imagine crying about something they explained to us before the ICO.
Fucking nulinkers, I swear.

>> No.18839913 [View]
File: 61 KB, 1826x1006, chainlink token distribution.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
18839913

>>18839873
>anything from the team?
Yes. Here's a message from 2017 where the team explain it.

>> No.18797832 [View]
File: 61 KB, 1826x1006, token sale chart.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
18797832

>>18797828
The team told us what the team tokens were for before the ICO.

>> No.18357316 [View]
File: 61 KB, 1826x1006, chainlink token distribution.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
18357316

>>18357252
CMC bases its "circulating supply" on pic related.

>>18357262
You used the wrong ID trying to pretend to be the same person here: >>18356878 >>18357122

lmao

>> No.17293278 [View]
File: 61 KB, 1826x1006, chainlink ico token distribution use.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
17293278

>>17292530
>tell us where that fuckin link went when it was thrown into binance half a year ago
You were told about that before the ICO.

>> No.17080596 [View]
File: 61 KB, 1826x1006, tokens.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
17080596

>> No.16712043 [View]
File: 61 KB, 1826x1006, stinkies.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
16712043

Only 12 months until financial freedom, the countdown starts now

>> No.16370422 [View]
File: 61 KB, 1826x1006, chainlink ico token distribution use.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
16370422

>>16368695
>>16368806
>>16369128
Then the "liquid supply" would be the full 1 billion, not 650 million.

Also, good job finding out what has been public knowledge since 2017 lmao.
You're a real smart cookie.
Please embarrass yourselves some more.

>> No.16142532 [View]
File: 61 KB, 1826x1006, N.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
16142532

What was it like? What was biz like? Investing 33k in something before they even dropped the white paper is something I would have never done, how where you so sure of the success?

>> No.16135337 [View]
File: 61 KB, 1826x1006, chainlink ico token distribution use.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
16135337

>>16135332
>>16135328
>imagine being this seething

They only own 30% (see pic), and KYC is literally optional.

>> No.15916471 [View]
File: 61 KB, 1826x1006, chainlink ico token distribution use.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
15916471

>>15916410
The Chainlink team only ever had access to 30% for funding, see pic (which is from before the ICO).

For a comparison: before his divorce Bezos held 16% of Amazon FOR PURELY PERSONAL USE.



Navigation
View posts [+24] [+48] [+96]