/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>10331249
If i have to explain to you the evolutionary reasons why our blood sugar skyrockets when we consume sugar, i'm going to have a fucking fit.

If you already have a high blood sugar level, then yes, over consumption can lead to diabetes.

But here is the issue again, diabetes is a result of over-consumption of sugars, that is a behavioral problem.

Soooooooo....reduce the consumption seems a more logical solution than chemical SUGARS that have 0 kJ!
(Aspartame is so chemically different from sugar, but being used as a substitute, it astonishes me that there could be no side effects, as you all claim)

>>10331287
not a treehugger mate, i just don't see why so people advocate so much to substitute something when sugar isn't a problem.

I am not like "anti-aspartame" or some shit, i have and do, on occasion, consume it. I simply don't seek it out or declare it a victor over sugar for muh humankinds an da buture! I take objection to those that do because it is counter-intuitive and i am curious how they have come to such a conclusion. you do want me to learn don't you anon?

I think they are all fat desu.