[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.13465879 [View]
File: 743 KB, 2048x2048, 981B395D-6B17-4F5E-AB21-82102CC6F9D8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13465879

I will give you proof that Craig is Satoshi at a 99++% probability. I want proper refutations, not onions-tier arguments. Hint: there are none.

The top is a forum post by Satoshi.

The bottom is a blog post by Craig that you can verify and find yourself on web.archive.

The probability of this being a coincidence is less than 0.01%. Let me explain.

The common idiotic white racist ONIONS-boy response to this is:

“But script kiddie is a common term!”

Yes, indeed it is. But notice the phrase that was used: “any script kiddie can”. Script kiddie itself may be common, but that particular phrase? It is specific and unique enough to be rare.

How rare you ask? Search it up on Google. Search for the exact phrase: “Any script kiddie can”. You will find 17 results since 2000.

That’s right. A total of SEVENTEEN results out of TRILLIONS of web pages that have been produced since 2000.

Considering that Craig is indeed rich, has indeed atleast known to be involved in bitcoin very early, the llikelihood that different people used the same phrase is infinitesimally low.

“But what about that email with a different timestamp?”

My response.

A) I have not seen any conclusive evidence that the email was submitted by Craig. I have seen evidence that it was withdrawn as an exhibit by Craig’s lawyers and that it was referenced as evidence, but still no proof it was originally submitted. It is also an email from Dave to Nguyen and Ira’s lawyers had previously been going through Dave’s emails so it could just have been submitted by Ira.

B) Craig has admitted to fake blogs on Reddit to throw people off, such as Wired.

C) I have not actually verified what contrarian__ claimed (that the timestamp is necessarily dated after Dave Kleiman’s death).

>> No.13455546 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 743 KB, 2048x2048, F4137B52-DCA1-41DD-9F08-B45B09B6EF2E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13455546

Bitcointalk post dated in August 2010: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=898.msg11155&utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app#msg11155

Blog post in 2008 by Craig: https://web.archive.org/web/20100527130803/http://www.sans.edu/resources/securitylab/craig_wright_hero.php?utm_source=share

WE. FUCKING. TOLD. YOU.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]