/biz/ - Business & Finance

It's about time. you had 6 years to accumulate. plebbit was price out after $2 which was the original mission - stop them being able to accumulate a suicide stack with their lunch money portfolios.
Anyone still advocating for not shilling our bags to plebbit is not acting in anons interest anymore. they are either malicious or just poorfags who want to accumulate longer with their lunch money stacks too. 6 years is enough time - too late.
I have seen that plebbit is started to get angry at Sandwich attacking, and basically none of them know of LINK anymore. a whole new generation of zoomers and top buying faggots are ready to be groomed into another Coinbase/Google pump event.

Additionally, will be making them aware of the LINK pump/BTC dump dynamic with some evidence of JUMP maybe being behind it. plebbit love a good "stick it to the hedgies" narrative.

Seething FUDcels, you will have to make dozens of accounts to combat this. good luck. your nastyslob low effort spam wont work there. I'll continue to fud on biz and call out Sergey where necessary, but it's time to shill to plebbit again.

SWINGIE LINKIE, LOST HIS STACK
SWINGIE LINKIE, WON'T GET IT BACK.

AT EIGHT FIFTEEN HE TRIED TO SWING
AT TEN FIFTEEN HE FOMO'D IN.

HE TRIED AGAIN AT TWELVE TWENTY ONE
AND NOW HE'LL MISS OUR GREAT BULLRUN.


HE DREAMS OF DUMPS, HE TRIES TO COPE
HIS ONLY SWING NOW'S, FROM A ROPE.

>>20894473

You guys act like this isnt unironically organic

WELCOME TO THE SECOND HALF OF 2020 MOTHERFUCKERS
DEFI IS HERE
THE TECH GIANTS ARE ON BOARD
THINGS ARE HAPPENING
THE GROWTH IS REAL
GET LINK
GET RLC
GET ETH BEFORE 2.0 COMES OUT
YOU FUCKERS WASTE SO MUCH TIME FUDDING
HOLY FUCK
SHUT THE FUCK UP
WE ARE ENTERING A TECHNOCRACY
PLAN ACCORDINGLY
GOD DAMN
AND YES LINK IS GOING TO TEN DOLLARS AND THEN GOING PARABOLIC
OPEN YOUR FUCKING EYES
LINK WILL LEAD THE DEFI BULLRUN
IF YOU HAVE TEZOS, YOU WILL LIVE OFF PASSIVE INCOME
IF YOU PREFER ETHEREUM, YOUR PATIENCE WILL PAY OFF
IF YOU OWN BITCOIN, COOL
IF YOU OWN RLC, YOU OWN DIGITAL OIL
IF YOU OWN XRP, YOULL PROBABLY BE RICH TOO
JUST STOP FUDDING AND ACTING LIKE ALL THIS ISNT TAKING PLACE
RIGHT NOW, RIGHT HERE, IN THE LATTER HALF OF 2020
THIS IS OUR TIME!!!!!!!!!!

>>20365840
How do hundreds of millions of dollars sound to you?

>>20365844
CHECKED

>>20351855
It needs to be based on market cap of the crypto. If the market cap is 1 billion USD and I owned crypto that is valued at 50 million USD then I'd be a whale

that Chainlink is the next Bitcoin?

>>19449300
>Wouldn't the payment have to be in ETH or something for example?
depends on the use case. remember SWIFT is compatible with link so bank to bank transfers are being done on their inhouse GPI, almost 40 trillion was transfered last year over it.

https://www.pymnts.com/news/faster-payments/2019/swift-says-more-than-40-trillion-transferred-over-gpi/

but in the pic i posted id imagine account to account fiat would go through an exchange where it was temporarly converted into the crypto for the chain the contract is being used on and then would be converted back into fiat. so crypto the specific crypto (eth, btc, ect) would only be used during the transfer portion of the smart contract. with a portion of the value of the contract being staked in LINK to help assure its integrity

Continued from
>>18972314

This is a simple concept but going through everything means will take a while so get comfy

The old chainlink diagrams like picrelated had a smart contract flow that went (input)->(chainlink node)->(smartcontract network)->(chainlink node)->(output)
The new ones have a network of chainlink nodes in the middle that can talk to existing smart contract networks (ethereum in the ETH talk, all networks in the non-eth talk)
In other words the default flow for a smartcontract no longer needs to touch any network other than chainlink

This doesn't sound like a big deal, but its huge for two reasons: development cycle and value capture.

We knew this was a shift from the time that chainlink announced arbitrum. The reason all the old lingfags sperged out was that opening and enterprise smart contracts platform would require throughout that would swamp ETH. If you watch the Ed Felten fireside chat he talks about simple arbitrum clusters now being capable of a few thousand TPS and, if you look at the KYC'd chainlink nodes right now there are enough for several clusters.

Continued

>>18972481
Before:

This. Is. The. Painkiller.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJ4Nel-aHZM

aside from big3:
BTC, ETH, LTC

make it portfolio (coins with good FA):
LINK
XTZ
ENJ
ENG
RLC
ZRX
KNC
ATOM
TRX (i know, i know, chink scam, but Justin Sun is going to pamp it)
VET (i know, i know, chink scam, but Sunny Lu's marketing team, Cream, is going to pamp it)
DOT
THETA (iffy)
NANO (iffy)

What are you going to do when you make it anon?
I don't have any frens right now, but if I do by the time I make it, I'm going to ghost them all.

>>15519432
OP, Its Time.

Testicles

>>15423415
>this won’t involve your project
yes it involves chainlink. everyone depends on decentralized oracles.
not just corda also hyperledger, quorum etc.

>>15412082
My man
0x645e5590bD731bF2745886b2248196cD05B41FB3

>>14911727
Literally Chainlink.

>>14664497
Oh man, you just don't need quant when you got chainlink connecting everything to anything, look at this picture, blockchain to blockchain, real world data to blockchain, there is no need for quant mate.

>>14596561
>never seen a wells fargo logo

This is just flat out wrong. Pic related.

>>14245874
go all in chainlink.
its the last x1000

go read the whitepaper and do your own research
https://link.smartcontract.com/whitepaper

good luck