/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>23641379
>>How is Stakenet a scam?
Rebranded from a coin from where they exit scammed (PoSW)
Roadmap is completely revamped every 12 months. "Things just didn't work out, here's the new roadmap"
Fake exchange volume (supported by devs)
Team prints coins for themselves. Last time was 7 million XSN in 2019.
Team holds a masterkey (can shut the chain down tomorrow, if they like)
>>If Stakenet is a scam, why does it have a genuine product in open beta that the public can use, and continues to being developed?
Bitconnect had a "genuine product". No evidence that it's being actively developed at this point. "Team" is a bunch of hired hourly workers from Ukraine. Look up their LinkedIn profiles (which they removed from the "Team site" last week btw). All of them have multiple simultaneous crypto "employers".
>>If Stakenet is a scam, why is there evidence of the X9 team having collaborated with some of the biggest names in crypto? (Ledger, litecoin)
Literally no proof of this outside the XSN community. Litecoin foundation even deleted all things Stakenet-related from their site, just a coincidence, right? As to the "Ledger collab"; they sent some code to Ledger, which they subsequently decided NOT to implement (piece of shit code).
>>Do you have any objective evidence at all that the developers Wont be able to meet their goals?
Look at the 2018 roadmap, LOL.

>>23501265
>devs said they want to hit all 3 targets in the next few months. So we'll likely get raiden by EoY.
This roadmap is 34 months old, so I guess that counts as "few months"?

>>23348861

>>23013713
lmao it's always something with this. They are notorious for not delivering what's on the roadmap. Note that what they're trying to do now (as the core wallet update was botched) was in the 2018 roadmap.

Is there a cryptocurrency in existence that is better at missing roadmap deadlines by 2+ years than XSN?

Remember this roadmap? Neither do the devs!