/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55093804
On what good faith basis could you possibly make that comparison? The supply of the two are completely different. LINK, at 50% circulating, has fed more supply into circulation to "subsidise nodes" and these inorganic rewards are immediately sold into the order books. How is this at all similar to the supply increases of BTC, already 95% circulating and ordained to taper off after every halving in an algorithmically transparent manner every 4 years? BTC is in a class of its own, a far bigger network, which is not immediately dumped practically across the board by nodes come bull or bear. That happens with LINK because demand is not sufficient to absorb the dumps. That's the fucking difference, dipshit.

By the way, the loftier your comparisons the greater your divorce from reality. Here you are again, today struggling to hold $6 at rank 22, comparing yourselves to increasingly more exceptional unicorn assets, BTC and AMZN and MSFT, which each day you slide further and further away from. You are deluded by pride, plain and simple.

>>55094539
Someone's a little cranky today! Did mom burn your pizza pockets again?

Couple of geniuses here!

Tell me why you aren't investing in the future? Coins like Black Swan are still sub 1M mc. And although not currently in a huge dip in price. It's stable enough to actual look into at least.

I'm moving here after we hit 1billion mc

>>54723840
>>54723853
>>54724105
Whatever this place is, with an anti-mosquito suit.