/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>11728640
lol no

>>11714891

Hello, you are currently what's known in the industry as a "clueless brainlet faggot".

Satoshi has already basically been proven to be Gavin without a shadow of a doubt because he has the exact same syntactic patterns as the white paper.

There's so many posts suddenly cropping up about how people other than Gavin are Satoshi since this study came out that I can only imagine that stupid fucking Gavin is paying retards to spread disinfo.

Anyway, you're full of shit. Bye.

Why is this still being debated?

Somebody already did a statistical analysis of the writings of people closest to the beginnings of Bitcoin and Gavin Andresen's writing is statistically identical to Satoshi's

Funny how you attach the least probability of it being Gavin though, this is about as much as I'd expect from a forum that's been expertly losing 80% of their shirts from endless shitcoin scams.

For further information, Google '"back-of-the-envelope" Bitcoin' and you'll get articles on what a shit job Gavin did at concealing his autistic , patterned turn of phrase.