/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>24259623
Good luck with your 1 dollar cost average before the Bitgrail trustee will dump 4 million Nano on the market in a short time.

>>24252371
>>24252440
>>24253029
>>24253536
>>24254019
The insane Nanoid community, pic related, has never been able to debunk anything. All you do is run the hell away or just hurl ad hominem, plus flagging my comments. That's what you ignorant losers do. Same with your dev that also had to run away, only for you psyhos to flag my posts like crazy. Here, show me what you deranged Nano scamers have debunked, do it.

>>24022419
>>24022462
>>24022482
Within a few months, the insane Nano scammers will have burned through all their Nano Foundation funds. Leaving Nano as a half-finished crashed tech project, dead in the water. Super bullish, ryte guys? Pic related.

>>23907536
I started to warn about Nano in mid sep 2018. Nano was then 3.33 USD. There is no way in hell I will buy Nano.

The utter morons in Nano not only has feminazis, jewish grifters and Italian scammers, they even managed to hire an open satanist as their community manager (rockmes*ckmeJesus). That's a combo from hell. Literally.

>>23907536
I started to warn about Nano in mid sep 2018. Nano was then 3.33 USD. There is no way in hell I will buy Fantom.

That the idiotic Nano not only has feminazis, jewish grifters and Italian scammers, they even managed to hire an open satanist as their community manager (rockmes*ckmeJesus). That's a combo from hell. Literally.

>>23887529
>You always come around before we moon
I started to warn about Nano mid SEP 2018. Nano was then 2.18 USD. What happened to Nano after that, delusional Nanoid?

>>22749535
>class action lawsuit and Nano Foundation bankrupt in a few weeks, even without the multiple lawsuits, is just awesome!

>>22749535
>class action lawsuit and Nano Foundation broke in a few weeks, is just awesome.

>>19189606
Literally felt like I'm stealing from someone at these levels.

>>17607214
Ryte....

>>17113982
>coinbase charges listing fees
It's not about listing fees. But legal, tech, organizational and structural communication between exchange and crypto-project. That Nano shortly will have no more funding for development, means that Nano will be a dead coin pretty soon. Who the hell will list that dead coin with a legal clusterfuck from hell, plus satanists being part of core team, connected to it? Are you a child investor or did you come from plebbit? Back to /r/GayBoyGangBang

>>16624354
>NANO doing 500tps on v21. Fastest in the market
No. Why do you Nanoids lie all the time? Give me your documentation, Nano scammer.
>Paypal was doing 50tps when it hit 100m users
Moron. PayPal is not directed against micro payments. Unlike Nano. Your average tps is typical of you Nano morons. Network must be able to handle peaks like Christmas, holidays, not average. Visa is calibrated for 65 000. Nano can't handle a fraction, yet Nano core scammers and stupid community keep on pushing that lie. Nano is Bitconnect 2.0
https://usa.visa.com/dam/VCOM/download/corporate/media/visanet-technology/aboutvisafactsheet.pdf

You are a scammer. Fuck off back to plebbit.

>>16611678
I did the same thing with Bitconnect. Buy a ton of BCC as well. You sound like a smart investor. A true Nano investor.

>>16325364
>>16325381
>>16325386
>>16327442
Delusional, pic related. Nano will slowly fade into obscurity and mcap 0.

>>16232249
How is that sunk costs? Do you first have to buy a node and THEN buy Nano? Are IO, CPU and bandwidth costs not both fix and variable, but sunk? Are you on drugs?

>>14967078
Please learn the difference between fluctuation and pumping.

>>14339335

>>14288010
>>14288037
Facebucks globohomo currency will blow Nano out off the water. Your dev fund is 5M and your idiotic dev team has no-marketing as their only marketing strategy, besides targeting third world countries first. How will you compete Zuck's GlobohomoCoin? And you never answer my questions regarding Nano being solely based on volunteers taking ALL the costs and maintenance for the network for free. For all eternity with NO downtime. It only functions now as an amateur project with hardly any traffic at all.

>>14250117
Weird and delusional community. Pic related.

>>14223774
It felt like stealing when me and my Nano friends all did the last buy to lower our cost average. Pic. related. All of us are now on suicide watch, except for one of us, but he is clinical delusional. Nannis....where are my nannis....mommy....where is my mommy..... At least I was not stupid biz and bought that clinky linky thing. Guess they all are WAY worse off than me and my articulate reddit friends with great grammars, punctuation and everything.

>>14207798

>>13792511
It is a design flaw. The flow of information throughout the Nano system with, say, a 100 000 TPS is insane and will not be feasible within ten years. And definitely not globally. So you flagged me again? This is what you sad nanoids always do. All major devs from the insane and dodgy handling of Bitgrail and the shameful treatment of the Bitgrail victims are there. Their sociopathic behavour then, merely a little over one year ago, is definitely price relevant today. Only a fool would think otherwise. No wonder you like flagging so much.

How is Nano compared to Fantom in regard to TPS and smart contracts?

>>12612707
Your comment only makes sense if there are no competing projects that are far, far better than Nano. That is not the fact. Nano investor with heavy bags?
https://www.quora.com/Which-are-the-best-blockchains-with-their-own-decentralized-network-independent-from-the-Bitcoin-s-network/answer/Marius-Kramer

>>12588042
The very state of crazy, delusional nanoids. Can't defend your Nano shitcoin, so ad hominem attacks is all you have. Tragic.