/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56504583
>>56504651
>blatant demoralization article
just close it anon. if you read beyond the headline you already lost.

>>56459378
>i'm doing my best to abstaine so i don't end up with ED
isn't it literally the reverse? I suppose may depend on your age.

>>56382504
>Ch*nese scam companies defaulting on foreign investors first
imagine my shock.

>>55764591
> he doesn't at least brief his wife on his overall investing activities and strategy
Let me guess. she'd spend the money in a heartbeat if she knew you had it.

>>54841919
>line go down therefore... line go up!!
did you check the fed funds rate lately

>>54387219
>Will an overleveraged shithole with terrible demographics that contract manufacturers are leaving in droves for cheaper shores, led by a grandiose boomer hell-bent on using military force to annex an adjacent island in the year of our lord 2023 despite a heavily export dependent economy, overtake the country that everyone even typical Chinese would immigrate to in a heartbeat if they had a greencard and that invents world-changing technologies on a regular basis?
yeah gonna have to think about this one...

>>53773529
>Buying internet funny money
no thanks zoom-zoom
Proof Of Lethal Force backed currencies (USD) are good enough for me

>>53483917
>no comment on all my other anime image posts just ad-hominem because out of replies
>Implying I would give even a cent to see an anime on N*tflix

>>53426808
>Counting Dodge after getting bought by FIAT
yikes... Mopar cope detected...

>all small car manufacturers get swallowed by
and do you think all those investors made money? a lot of times when that happens, it's because the small guy is going bankrupt and their shit is bought for pennies on the dollar. I have seen it happen with shale oil companies, it will happen for EVs too.

>>51561982
yea. I am not clicking that.

>>51186810
bro that that is the most retarded course of action possible, in a number of ways
First of all you are not going to get life changing gains on 3x leverage, and frankly even if you 10x $15k it won't really do much for you on MCD's income.
Second of all, and this ties into the previous point, at this level you really need to focus on ways to improve your income. Using that $15k to pay expenses while you do some kind of training, or to provide a buffer to move to a city with better job opportunities, or even just to avoid going into debt, would be a better use than literal gambling.
AND finally third of all... If you win by pure gambling, the LAST thing you want to do is immediately spend it on a woman. Whatever you spend will almost definitely be unsustainable

So basically. Don't think of that $15k as a lotto ticket you must discard entirely or 10x. Think of it as a bridge to improve 8+ hours of your day, every day. THEN when you can save at least, let's say, $20k a year, and you have a job that doesn't make you want to kys, you can start trying to play the markets and/or get a date.

>>50929206
>shills weed stocks
>then starts spamming out of nowhere
my friend. are you perhaps consuming a bit of "The Devils Lettuce", at this current moment.

>>50913343
>I'm taking care of a disabled family member
then you REALLY shouldn't be gambling on dogshit meme stocks
but at least your time is well spent if not your money

>>50830315
I mean that is what Gridman is memed for. It's a shame because it's actually a pretty good, chill, giant robot show of which said JK is a medium element of.

>>50830249
>yeah inflation is only (TM) 8%, and Thats A Good Thing
yes, surely this is bullish...

>>50812032
maybe not in starving poor countries that use metric
in America however with meat & potatoes relatively available from a young age, it is not so tall

>>50793149
>limited exchange
In my opinion this is utter bullshit pushed by war hawks. What nation with the means to respond is just gonna go "yeah OK you leveled a few of our cities but they were small ones near bases, no biggie let's cut this conflict off after uhhh... 5-10 nukes??"

To be clear, I think the no US intervention is the more likely scenario - really, what US ambiguity prevents is a siege of the island which according to /k/ would otherwise be the obvious strategy. It forces China to resort to a huge-scale surprise attack with a force that is not truly equipped for it, at least not yet.

>>50793165
>it can't be that bad
would you bet millions of lives on that hypothesis?