[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.24556664 [View]
File: 104 KB, 643x960, 1492207915201.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24556664

>>24556271

>> No.16311286 [View]
File: 104 KB, 643x960, 1492207915201.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16311286

>>16311250
OMG...

I fucking LOVE the sage option.

Biz is soooo fucking based lol. sage option= le god.

We need to meme the sage option into emperor status lol, how frickin based would that be guys?

It's like... the sage option is just as based as Trump and MoonMan. I think its because the sage option so sassy and non-sequitorious.

This is TOTALLY the next, most epic and righteous BASED meme.... get this:

the sage option is on the internet...

the sage option is contrarian to what seems reasonable and admirable...

Controversial...

Quite silly and ironic...

But actually a super fun and great option.

>> No.10929300 [View]
File: 104 KB, 643x960, 1492207915201.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10929300

>>10929288

>> No.8297368 [View]
File: 104 KB, 643x960, 1492207915201.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8297368

>>8291225
>the anon you replied to

>> No.6238647 [View]
File: 104 KB, 643x960, 1492207915201.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6238647

>>6238477
WOAH....

So, would the implication be that the Core devs are the ones implementing Satoshi's vision and not the numales over at Coinbase, the miner chinks, or that histrionic faggot Roger Ver?

>> No.4832410 [View]
File: 104 KB, 643x960, 1492207915201.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4832410

>>4832386
sage

>> No.4484548 [View]
File: 104 KB, 643x960, 1492207915201.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4484548

>>4484533

Still coping. Next round of FUD will be the Bitcoin difficulty adjustment in a couple of days.

Starting to get predictable now.

>> No.2980504 [View]
File: 104 KB, 643x960, 1492207915201.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2980504

>>2980443
>“Why would miners adopt the SegWit format, given that it does not provide any savings of bandwidth, storage, or processing time to them?”

>Most previous soft forks have not provided these benefits to miners either. For example,
>BIP16 (P2SH) New transaction type
>BIP30 (duplicate txids) Required checking for duplicate txids
>BIP34 (height in coinbase) Reduced miner coinbase space by 4 bytes
>BIP65 (OP_CLTV) New opcode

>The BIP66 (strict DER) soft fork which activated in July 2015 will soon be providing reduced processing time by making it possible to switch to libsecp256k1 for validation as described elsewhere in this FAQ. The reduced validation time makes it uncommon among soft forks in that it provides direct benefits to miners.

>What segregated witness (segwit) does is provide several major benefits to anyone who uses it to create transactions:

>A permanent fix for third-party malleability, allowing multi-stage smart contracts to flourish. A modest reduction in fees. Easy future upgrades to Bitcoin Script, so wallets can more easily gain access to new features.

>Through the previous soft forks, and through conversations such as the Miners’ Panel at Scaling Bitcoin Hong Kong, miners have repeatedly shown that they want Bitcoin to be the most useful system possible even if they don’t receive any direct benefits. Segwit and the other improvements in the roadmap provide significant usability enhancements.

>In addition, segwit allows miners to put more transactions in their blocks, which may allow them to increase their per-block revenue.

https://bitcoincore.org/en/2015/12/23/capacity-increases-faq/

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]