/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>59449875
>With BBBY
Nigga it's been there since it was cancelled

>>59396250
>Michael Goldberg
He is playing 36DDchess

>>59164052
and the Class 9 Shareholders?

>>59079669
>>59079677
Based Goldberg

>>59068088
>by implying he was bad at his job or potentially a bad guy.
He was great at his job

>>59032148
>he doesn't (or refuses) to know that restructuring can involve winding down of business
>his last cope is a fraud payout from a lawsuit that isn't a class action
>he's not even a plaintiff in the fraud lawsuit
>his cope stems from a lawsuit that he isn't even part of
>b-but I'm a (former) shareholder
>forgetting his rights as a shareholder was extinguished (among other rights that come from owning a share) when his shares were sent to the shadowrealm
Your rights to receive something doesn't come from thin air. I can understand Goldberg's frustration and befuddlement when he drafted his response.

>>59015296
What I'm trying to put across is Goldberg was retained because of his experience in the field, not because of some shadow agreement with shadow chairmen Cohen x Icahn. Beyond that, he also said this

Checking in after a long absence. wtf this thread is still going, it's been ONE YEAR since your bags disappeared. It's time to stop.

>>58892134
>No im not looking for it for you faggot, go fish.
Actually, the plan administrator said pic related.

>>58769400
dead thread
dead stock
>wouldn't even make another
LMAO
M
A
O

>>58739663
are we also just forgetting about this prophecy

>>58653677
>and Michael was selected and approved by creditors of BBBY as well as the debtors whom is BBBY itself.
Oh you mean this guy? The guy who's going to take down Bernie Madoff 2.0?

>>58472720
>is BBBY will return
Uncancel a stock perhaps?

>>58471449
>for now

>>58091180
>Who is Michael I. Goldberg? Plan administrator for BBBY chapter 11
>Connections to FBI, busted madoff, possible white hat

is this general still going kek

This hurts the distractioniggers

When's the next cope date BBBaggiebros?
>>57606228
lel

>>57385298
>accuses anon as illiterate
>can't read this

>>57245466
>We quash them in any debate
My rabbi in yhwh, plugging your ears and shouting lalalalala isn't "quashing" someone in a debate.

>>57221280
aside from the stock become worthless you mean

>>57122521
Because BBBYQ no longer exists, and all derivatives also likewise stopped existing after BBBYQ's cancellation. You can't just get DD from an extant stock (GME) and apply it to BBBYQ (non-extant)

>>57104498
ask them from where they derive the right to get new equity. The braver ones will answer
>BBBYQ record of ownership
Okay, you are in a list of (former) BBBaggies. Please show the clause in that list which entitles you to receive equity that is yet to be issued.
The reply will be
>NDA

>>57092217