/biz/ - Business & Finance

>devnet -> rename

Yvan eht noiJ

Okay so this "Nuls" is another shitcoin dispenser? Yea I'll pass.

Yea, but you also need to be careful on not losing money on some glorified shitcoin dispensers and China Hustles.

Smart Contracts is the real "revolution". We all know the one crypto that will benefit from this.

As far as crypto "currency" goes, if it can't scale then it can't be used. And even if it can scale there is still the volativity problem which brings me to my next point.

Maybe there is a way to make a stable decentralised cryptocurrency? I think MakerDao is doing it with Dai or something. I don't know how decentralised and secure it is though.

It's come to my attention that some Anon's here aren't practicing their daily visualizations (which is leading to a decline in LINK token price).

Let's fix this together. Post a link to the song you'll listen to when you make it, or the song that helps your visualize your success. Here's mine:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNB8r6zttDw

Come in, the water's warm. You know, us Chainlink Marines get a bad rap - we''re not really in a cult.

Aint that right /biz/?

>>10874977

Hi /biz/,

Chainlink will be publicly launched at the GLBC Annual Meeting tomorrow in Washington D.C.

What is the GLBC?
>The Global Legal Blockchain Consortium (GLBC) was announced on August 15, 2017 during the week of the International Legal Technology Association annual convention.

>Now approaching its one year anniversary, the GLBC is the largest blockchain consortium in the world focused exclusively on the application of blockchain technology to the business and practice of law. The first annual meeting of the Global Legal Blockchain Consortium is expected to be the largest gathering of its kind in history. It will bring together hundreds of senior leaders of law firms, companies, technology companies, and universities to experience and discuss the application of blockchain technology to the business and practice of law.

>The event will have a strong emphasis on practical applications of blockchain technology in the legal industry, with technology demonstrations, presentations, and announcements.

Pay special attention to:

>"There will be committee meetings, technology demos, major announcements by members, and the public launch of a significant new company."
>https://legalconsortium.org/glbc-annual-meeting/

You have 16 hours left to accumulate under $1. Good luck /biz/, I love you guys.

What happened to that LINK thread that kept getting deleted last night?

You guys are just being ironic when you say you're going to sell your LINK tokens right?

I know most of us are probably just trying to spread FUD by saying "I'll sell at $400, $600, $1000" etc.

But for those Anon's who aren't so bright, I felt like I needed to remind them that instead of selling they can just stake their nodes and earn passive income for life.

No one's actually selling, right?

MEMES

Hi /biz/,

I know we're mostly sitting here waiting for the Singularity, but I was wondering if anyone could share some speculation or insight into what the potential rewards for staking LINK might be, whether we use LinkPool or are able to stake our LINK to official enterprise nodes on their behalf.

Most of us don't have valuable API data so running our own node wouldn't be possible, but assuming we can stake our LINK's otherwise, what kind of returns might we expect? I'm quite curious since of course if the Singularity hits most of us would be tempted to sell, which might rob us of potential gains.

>>10663309
its just a meme

Most of you, despite your great efforts to research Chainlink, don't understand what the real value of the network is, and more importantly, who will benefit most first from its use.If you took the time to think about the team and the problem, you'd notice that they both point in a single direction: towards high-value, low frequency transactions with easily externally verifiable data triggers which have parties with an extremely large incentive to act at least partially dishonestly.People are talking about automated payroll and IOT like these applications make sense at current. They don't, because the technology has decreased the cost of trust 100x, not 100,000,000x. The first people to use cellphones were the ones who could afford 20 bucks a minute because they made more money off that communication advantage than it cost them.


Everyone thinks the technology unrolling in front of them is somehow magical, but this is literally just another technology: it takes something expensive and makes it lots cheaper. Every other tech follows this path: the people already paying huge amounts for that thing buy up all the early uses and then things trickle down. Think again the adoption of the cell phone or personal computer. For the most part you don't need to have a trustless relationship with your employer, but if it cost you 5 bucks a year to make sure you couldn't get screwed by them, you'd pay it.