/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58625293
What possible benefit would I gain from taking time to painstakingly explain to you any of that?

>>56982373
Even if they have no way of dealing with the megabag I assume there's still skme T+whatever that would give them just enough time for another weekend of"L-look the thing didn't happen in the date we kept spamming it would happen AAH RED NUMBER RED NUMBER SELL SELL!"

Same kike, different day.

>>56510524
Incorrect. My evidence is many magnitudes more than needed to justify my own purchase. I don't care if you buy, so your personal opinion of my evidence is irrelevant. If your intent is to convince me my investment is flawed, you need provide evidence to substansiate your own argument. Seeing as you cannot, I have no reason to change my current investment strategy.

>>56351674
You're overthinking things copypasta. It doesn't matter who is or isn't a glownigger. 4chan is how it is because the people who use it are innately unaffected by peer pressure. Glowies mistakenly think it's some kind of right wing hugbox that they can lead as they would the various other shitholes, and always fail because of that. They keep thinking "if only we could blend in better. We just need more data". They could have 8,000 exabytes worth of data and train the ultimate chatgpt indistinguishable from any other anon and it wouldn't matter, because that gptanon would be wrong and have shit tastes. Consensus "manipulation" means fuckall to people who don't care about the consensus. If 12 billion people believe something wrong and gay, those 12 billion people are wrong and gay and can go fuck themselves. Truth or gtfo.

Can the banks just fail and start debt dominoing now? I'm bored and would like to be rich.