/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>49958425
>>49958485
do they sell used whips?

>>49901799
The hero we need, Brandon is about to speak too, so hopefully he crashes the market since JPow failed us.

>>49708834
We need UBI but for sex instead of monies. Think of all the discrimination and subconscious bias that happens in sex. We need equity in sex.

>>29339985

>>29215703
get some BNF as well, put like 50k on it & then sell in 3 days time
https://twitter.com/cryptogems555/status/1363093293421260800?s=20

>>28639347

>>26770354
Why

>>26388869

>>25782237

This currency couldn't be in a more challenging situation and it is STILL surpassing and testing .30 support.

Despite its situation it is still blasting on all cylinders in all foreign corridors with transactions.

It is a completely transparent and accountable bank coin that is not currently under control of the CCP. There are next to no transaction fees across all independent validators - only one of which is Ripple Labs..
Most fudders hate this because they want crypto to be free and decentralized and not controlled by a gov't, that's why XRP catches a lot of flack. Philosophically I sympathize with them.

The transactions complete in 3-5 seconds.

Contracts will be available within the next 3 month utilizing Flare.

Most of the strategic C-level positions at Ripple labs are filled with heavy-hitting people-of-note within the fintech industry, which tells you how enmeshed this tech already is with the system.

Yes, crypto is still a wild-west situation and we don't know what it will look like a week from now, let alone a few years from now, but XRP is one of the lead ponies in the race right now. You'd be a fool to sleep on it.

>>25335512
thanks
good explanation, I'm actually pretty excited to be learning this new shit, feels good to use the noggin

$500.00 tonight.

>>24750643
>>24750655
yes I see now
keep going

>>23510420
>>23510480
>>23510519
>>23510555
>>23510603
>>23510617

You're a bold bunch, that's for sure. I've never been fingered by agent Platinumstein so I'm being cautious, but I think I'll just go with something simple like what >>23510480 said.

Thanks for the input.

>>19402826
It's not just a mathematical issue.

If you lose 10% of your starting value and then gain 10% of that same starting value there is no loss (ceteris paribus, spread et cetera priced in).

The OP doesn't state that the later 10% gain is a percentage of the later -10% value. For me, most likely he (internet girl) means he lost 10% of his value and afterwards gained that same 10% value, derived from the original 100% value. This makes most sense to me because you would always calculate from your original input. That value is your value at stake. If you take your 10% loss and call the new value your calculation value you are essentially 'buy-high-sell-low' minded. You accept your -10% defeat and calling your new value your starting point. And I am just not tempted to regard the OP from that point of view. But if you do and you get your calculator out, it says more about your MO than OPs post.

>>17996402
Its 8kun now fren

>>16932713
>quality Twetches
What's that consist of? Can I post porn on there?

>>6459653
Show me a skinny twink shoulder looking different.