/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>30377272
about 1.5 mil ONE

>>29394994
Unironically this. This has nothing like the same energy that the 2018 dump had. Bitcoin fell hard multiple times throughout the 2017 bullrun. It won't be until some absurd valuation in the hundreds of thousands that we actually fall again. Why?

>All the normies that saw 2017 as their first exposure to crypto and kept calling it Tulips and felt validated when it crashed, have now seen it blow past that previous high. Crypto has been legitimized after the general public seeing that nobody that bought that decided to just hold, lost any money.
This is reason enough for the uptrend to last a long as fuck time.

Is /BIZ/ really going to sleep on the next 100x?

>>28706475
200 IQs got in when it was below half a cent
150 IQs are getting in now after realizing that it's in fact, not dead, and the platform is severely undervalued compared to every other platform.
50 IQs will get in after it already 100x'd like LINK and then say that anyone with over 1 mil ONE is a larping faggot and complain when it doesn't moon 10x after already being in the top 10.

>>28652944
And you literally know it's him because who else would be autistic and angry at them enough to waste time scoping out any mentions of them and share that archived blog post.

>>28652079
Edgar, you were fired because you thought someone violated your safe space and now you're out a job for being a woke retard. You can either keep seething, or grow up, your choice.