/biz/ - Business & Finance

Never believe it's not so

>>21756478

You can use NaaS but the implication of using LP suggest you could also join the staking pool (there is no explicit limitation described when saying "using LP") which is again not clear because likely the limits of the pool will be taken up in full by the LP holders.

>>20636391
i love hearing these. thanks for the hopium anon

>>17693333
God this is such a fucking based post.

>>16057533
if you know, you know

>>15965548
oldfag reporting in
did you think hundreds of teams was merely a meme?

>>15558541

>>15556925
BTC and ETH had non-stop FUD, even up to the very point they mooned. Hell, both are still fudded to this day. Just ignore it. It will never end. Any FUD of value is long gone.

synchronicity and singularity.

Within 10 minutes of Sergey stepping on stage, we will see the biggest green dildo in Chainlink history, propelling straight into the double digits.

>>15060879
kind of.

the most important line which sums it up is basically "If you could launch a perfectly coded, perfectly transparent, perfectly decentralized oracle network right now you would still lose to chainlink."

It's first movers advantage, but multiplied massively due to the circumstances. Some RLC shill can argue that their code is better (not true but let's say) but none of it matters. It's the same thing as how BSV could be argued to be technologically superior to BTC.

And also, what is the likelihood of link showing resilience in a tether collapse bear market? Of course it would crash at first with everything else, but could it pull off serious gains like it did in 2018, with real development and progress?

Would all of the shit/scamcoins in the top 15 unironically bleed to 0, with real projects like link surpassing them?

If we saw regulation step in after a tether collapse, I somehow think this could be unironically bullish for link in the medium term. Without tether, most of these scam wash traded coins wouldn't be propped up by anything.

>>14913568
FUD, the charts show $50 by end of this year

this is a conservative estimate

>>14644558
mfw

average buy in of 0.36 reporting in

if these newfags are serious and actually freaking out they will unironically never make it. they will end up selling their stacks at $20.

>>14431232
Depends, it's my view that link will outperform every other crypto in the short term and probably the long term as well. If you're a hodler, I would suggest to keep accumulating indefinitely, but get as much as you can ASAP.
You can try and gamble with shitcoins. There will definitely be some shitcoins that pump massively during next year's bullrun but those are not guaranteed gains.

No. 2021 at the absolute earliest.

Fuck you nulink redditors, what part of cold storage and adamantium hands don't you understand?

anyways im going to sleep
would be based if someone made a collage of this thread eventually so OP learns his lesson. later marines.

Facebook will announce it is using Chainlink on Tuesday, June 18th of 2019.

>*saves your coin*
nothin personnel zuck

>>13950868
based

>>13920970
They won't "now". But they'll come in slowly but surely. Nulinkers have been deluded into thinking that mainnet is 100% done and everything is ready to go.

LINK was always a blue chip in the sense that it was NEVER going to pump for no reason. The moon mission begins with real fucking adoption, and this will take perhaps a year at the earliest. Even then, we would be somewhat early.

Even just take for example all of these smaller partnerships, they came in slowly and one at a time. If they wanted to pump the price, they would've announced all of them at once, but they didn't.

It's time to take the hopium/meme mask off. Stay strong marines, and we're all gonna make it.

>>13886236
>we hit $20-$50 (probably sometime near the end of 2020)
I feel like LINK is definitely going higher than this by end of 2020. Largely due to the btc halvening. At the peak of the bull run it could reach triple digits quite easily, but of course it would crash back down afterwards.

>>13821906
Doesn't matter in the end if they were larping, dates aside, pretty much everything they have said about link is true.