/biz/ - Business & Finance

probably no one because it's too difficult to maintain
most ETHies run a node that doesn't even have all the transactions but they still call it a full node
then they changed the name of full nodes to something else and basically only exchanges have enough resources to run one
even coinbase outsourced their ethereum node to a 3rd party and the oldest exchange in the uk decided to de list ethereum because the full node was too difficult to maintain

>>16711755
no not at all bitcoin core is and will always be backwards compatible
>>16711526
>1000s of devs agree
lol this is the reason why ETH kids are communist, so gullible

>>15641269
you're the epitome of fag leftest group think that defects with "get medical help" because they can't make an educated observation or point outside the pre-approved opinions of the "thought leaders"
seriously man you're a fucking brainlet
the fucking developers are debating this EIP and it had become an acceptable consequence in changing the code

Are you going to pretend that no dapps are going to be affected or try to argue I'm wrong because I don't have a specific one in mind?
top developers have acknowledged this problem and you're a fucking nobody

This is the future precedence of ETH and it can't be changed

>>15573925
>you have to do LSD or mushrooms and think for 8+ hours to get it
lol

>>15513150
It's only to set a precedence that massive changes can happen regularly