/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>51519483
please stop mister, I have buy orders at 17k

>>51171703
minimum validator limit can be set from 2000 to something like 500 AVAX. It will likely be set lower and lower over time. The plan is to have it set by on-chain governance when governance is released in a upcoming update.

Anyways 1 million validators is obviously overkill, but the main point is that Avalanche consensus has a unique ability to scale far past ~150 validators, all the way into the millions, without taking a hit to finality times. It scales something like log(N) compared to BTC and ETH's N*log(N). BTC and ETH both start having issues around 100+ validators, which is why you see many Nakamoto style coins like DOT and ETH and Cosmos put hard caps on # of full validator. I would say somewhere between 5000 and 100,000 validators is a good goal, more than enough to create indestructible resiliency.

Also not all validators will want to validate every subnet(except the primary chain X, C, P), so market forces will dictate the number of validators each subnet will have based on tokenomics of that subnet. Low value, low stake gaming subnets will likely have far less validators than subnets doing sensitive financial transfers.

>>50707777
quads of truth

god I want to fuck her face so bad