[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.19694266 [View]
File: 421 KB, 1371x1920, c4160aba02f32b3fcf6421164cd80103.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19694266

>>19694256
Insofar as the individual wants to preserve himself against other individuals, in a natural state of affairs he employs the intellect mostly for simulation alone. But because man, out of need and boredom, wants to exist socially, herd-fashion, he requires a peace pact and he endeavors to banish at least the very crudest bellum omni contra omnes [war of all against all] from his world. This peace pact brings with it something that looks like the first step toward the attainment of this enigmatic urge for truth. For now that is fixed which henceforth shall be "truth"; that is, a regularly valid and obligatory designation of things is invented, and this linguistic legislation also furnishes the first laws of truth: for it is here that the contrast between truth and lie first originates. The liar uses the valid designations, the words, to make the unreal appear as real; he says, for example, "I am rich," when the word "poor" would be the correct designation of his situation. He abuses the fixed conventions by arbitrary changes or even by reversals of the names. When he does this in a self-serving way damaging to others, then society will no longer trust him but exclude him. Thereby men do not flee from being deceived as much as from being damaged by deception: what they hate at this stage is basically not the deception but the bad, hostile consequences of certain kinds of deceptions. In a similarly limited way man wants the truth: he desires the agreeable life-preserving consequences of truth, but he is indifferent to pure knowledge, which has no consequences; he is even hostile to possibly damaging and destructive truths. And, moreover, what about these conventions of language? Are they really the products of knowledge, of the sense of truth? Do the designations and the things coincide? Is language the adequate expression of all realities?

>> No.16393701 [View]
File: 421 KB, 1371x1920, 1561685477387.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16393701

01000000 01001101 01110010 01000011 01110101 01100111 01110011

>> No.14482405 [View]
File: 421 KB, 1371x1920, 1561685477387.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14482405

>>14481998
>t. satoshi flipper

>> No.14434101 [View]
File: 421 KB, 1371x1920, 1561685477387.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14434101

>>14433868

>> No.14414744 [View]
File: 421 KB, 1371x1920, c4160aba02f32b3fcf6421164cd80103.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14414744

>>14414684
>AMORC
Damn, disappointing if so. Pretty much expected though.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]