/biz/ - Business & Finance

No fucking shit. You think it's any coincidence that a bunch of commie faggots completely takeover the educational industrial complex from top to fucking bottom and suddenly a middling college degree costs as much as a house?

>>29544540
>tell that to michal kalecki, though you won't have heard of him as you've never studied economics, have you?

No

>>14766809

>>14734924
WUN FOUSAND A MONF!?
HEEFS GOGHT MAIY VOET!!
PLBRBRBRBRBPF!!

you are fucking stupid kid

Yang wants to regulate crypto, that's about the unfriendliest thing you could do for it. He'll also destroy the economy with his retarded policies but I'm sure you think you'll make it out of the resulting crypto pump and dump unscathed unlike 99% of the rest of them

>Let's do what the Higher Education Act of 1965 did for tuition rates in the US but for everything else instead!

BASED YANG GET THE RAPIDLY DEPRECIATING BAG BROS

>>13965882

>>13633138

>>13630812
This is the free market, meaning that we're free to do business with countries that want to play by our arbitrary rules.

>mfw China goes back to being an irrelevant stink heap just as quickly as it became a world power

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3009698/why-us-china-trade-wars-latest-escalation-could-be-good-news

https://www.vietnam-briefing.com/news/us-china-trade-war-inspires-vietnam-growth.html/

kill yourself

>>13544589

>>13542668
Consider the median age of the country has been increasing even as the country's population has doubled that sounds about right

>population under 18: 22.6%
>population over 65: 15.6%

Give or take welfare nibbas who should be working (then again, they have to at least pretend to be looking for work to receive benefits so those people probably don't count) and old people working who shouldn't be.

Labor force participation was Republican fud during Obama's administration, is Democrat fud during Trump's administration and is pro-Yang fud on this festering shit heap of a board. The truth is it's not much higher or lower than what it was since the moment it started being recorded in the 50s (which was incidentally at a time when the "career woman" meme wasn't such a thing and no one had ever seen an illegal immigrant in their life, the labor participation was low-as was the population in general-and the laborer themselves was valued proportionally higher than they are today).

https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/labor-force-participation-rate

>>13530601
>the most monitored man in the world-and whose personal wealth has decreased by 25% over a two year period-is engaging in illegal insider trading

>>13518692

>>13482000
>That shit's retarded
Why?

>Higher taxes should be in place on the people who want most to participate in the rule of the country. Lower taxes on those who you do not want to motivated to be involved

I agree, people should be able to opt out of paying for things like the public school system if they want to considering the many alternatives available these days instead of being coerced by threat of force. You've hit the nail on the head here, I feel.

>>13482046
>red white and blue man bad!

Are you Norwegian perhaps? Are you still waiting for the government to give you the $195,000 surplus USD-equivalent it's taken from you over the past 30 years or so ( >$6,000 a year)? Maybe some day! Are you worried about the oil drying up within a few years and putting over a fifth of your gdp and 60% of your exports at risk?

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-08/norway-is-walking-away-from-billions-of-barrels-of-oil-and-gas

>>13447898
Consider that very often the great bulk of these billionaires' wealth isn't liquid cash but a product of the companies these people direct (or in some instances have bought into from the outside) in the form of stocks. Compare the gross profit to net profit of many these people's companies, the greater implications of this, and maybe you'll understand why liquidating them in exchange for a year's worth of gains would be absolutely nothing compared to what would be lost in the process.

Look at macroeconomic phenomena like globalism, intrusive government, feminism, overpopulation, the ubiquity of dubious/overpriced college degrees etc.; looking at individuals who are fortunate enough to net a few dozen dollars off of their employee's paychecks is damage control for the far more substantial (((machinations))) of poverty.

>>13440012
>If you did you'd learn that Tether lent Bitfinex money