/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15425306
What's unrealistic about it? The plan isn't even to scale onchain so less fees for miners. Hashpower is about to drop like a stone after the next halving. Don't even want to think about how bad it'll be in the next halving.

>>14946642
>Crypto still hasn't received mainstream and worldwide adoption
Yes, and BTC is to blame for that.

>>14899504

>>14899142
hmmmmmmmmmmmmm

>>14574841
Just because the reward gets cut in half does not automatically mean the price has to rise proportionally. What's likely to happen is a bunch of miners go under and the total hash of the network goes down. Miners are suppose to be making up the difference with fees, but BTC's transnational throughput is limited.

>>14440448
There's literally no reason for BTC to retain any of its dominance.

>>14422392
>what is Lightning Network and smart "steal the fees from miners" contracts
>what is the next halving and pic related

>>14411327
>it's just capitalism and competition
It sure is and BTC doesn't have its chops up to compete. Once that shitcoin is removed from its usurped throne we can actually begin to see real change in the way of sound money in this world.

What's this pattern called?