/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19167523
News only is for China, and it is old.

>>19167575
This article actually says something useful, and it brings up good discrepancy points between the two. Doesn't actually attack the supply side arguments, ends up advising general caution...but that was actually useful so thank you for that. Guess you think line go down too, or still think inventory line go down, can't tell.

>>19167699
Am i seriously that recognizable even when not talking about tankers or posting feet? Really? How the fuck. But okay.

>>18909640
Wow. Talk about insightful. I will keep an eye out and continue individual company investment personally. if over maybe 2 years or so indexes win out, I go with some indexes. Something to write as a sticky note somewhere. I got time right now to put in effort, without real obligations.

>>18909701
I suppose. You make good arguments, and portioning out isn't a bad idea. I don't think you are wrong at all, and I will consider it. In this market though....I just don't know. Also dealing with the issue of "now," I really don't wanna sell at a loss to be a good boy so it is a bit out of the question until I get some yields. I plan on wrecking my NAT position once it goes positive, I just need it to beat 6 again basically for very good profits, not a big ask. But for now....what to do but ride the waves desu.