/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58379632
It's forming a symmetrical / ascending triangle (it's something in the middle), that means 80% bullish, 20% bearish

>>58205942
It isn't melting my face but my gains are melting. POS outperformed by fucking BTC.
Gilles betrayal is hurting

>>58201965
Blair is useless tho

>>58146695
What's your point ?

The last post on twitter and the strange gif animating 1.5 circle represents the worker pools. Now I don't know if it means they are almost done.

>>57986601
It's so over, now I realize

>>57955283
Doing honorable work, it is all tiresome.
About their BTC and ETH, I heard that they don't want to touch their warchest because of "taxes". I don't konw if it's true. One thing is sure they barely touched anything with all the founding they received.
How Blair hasn't been fired yet ? I thought he was gone, he never did shit and never will.
Goodspeed razerboy

>>57715376
I'm going to be honest here anon... Just play it safe, don't chase "moonshots"... Pick coins that you KNOW will be ok... You'll make it if you're patient while being RISK AVERSE. Time in the market beats timing the market.

Currently there are a few OBVIOUS winners for this bull run. The AI sector and the DePIN sector are the two sectors which will probably dominate this cycle more or less. Don't try and chase stupid small cap pump and dumps. Just buy the "big coins" which all mostly already "pumped"... Getting a x10 from here IS NOT A BAD DEAL. If you have 100k$ a x10 is 1m$... 1m$ is more than enough to set you up for the next bull run. Then just repeat the same thing in the next bull run. Be RISK AVERSE, don't chase pumps and moon shots, rather be late on trends then early. The trend needs to be really obvious before you put your money into it.

>>57583519
I would like to know so just how many OG link holders still hold RLC as well.
Since 2017 pure torture

>>50243844
no but every year the team promises something only to disappoint
>but this time will be different
iexec has a habit of creating new spiteful bagholders

please stop selling your digital oil

>>29321060
RLC isn't LINK plus coun't less anons said that in ITT and it can't moon in BULL MARKET how on earth do you expect it to pump in a bear market ??
>>29321174
Of course, we are missing the bull run and worst, we are bleeding in sats, what are we waiting ? Adoption ? We are light-years away from a company posting a tweet saying "We are proud to use and trust iExec.

>3 days ago was 2.60
>now it can't even break 2 dollars
>every time BTC pumps, it dumps
>every time BTC dumps, it dumps harder

Kek

HE'S BACK

>>27784077
Based, I wish I had the cash at the time to split it. I figured all in one (the one that wasnt being shilled) would play out better, lol.

Btw guys we can get this listed on coinbase much faster and it will 100x from there quite quickly due to low supply and low selling pressure.

We just need to have a presence on twitter. I know it's a lot to ask but shilling RLC is easy

>>27703172
Be careful, otherwise you'll be in coma at this rate

back to $1... I guess... wake me up when september ends

>>26043457
Yes but it wont matter, because RLC is a stablecoin and will never go below 1$

>1.09

It was 1.41 when BTC was 39k before, if BTC dumps back to 30k this weekend then RLC will go to 60 cents. Digital oil, what were we thinking?

where the fuck is methanon
will he return?

>literally invents a new data technology
>/biz/ doesn't give a fuck
pull me out of virtual reality when biz stops being stupid faggots
*click*

GILLES NOOOOO DON'T MIX YOUR PRIVATE LIFE AND WORK

>>24518927
iExec RLC

87 village stack = 1 / 1.000.000th of the supply
870 suicide stack = 1 / 100.000th of the supply
8700 make it stack = 1 / 10.000th of the supply

>>24492972
Read this >>24490831
Read this >>24492747