/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58568239
>Lack of transparency is a huge issue.
>In a public announcement they implied:
>1. APU.com cost 7 figures.
>2. APU was featured in an episode of the Simpsons.
>Neither of these statements are true.
>Then one person who vandalized the Simpsons wiki but had his post immediately reverted also tried pumping his bags by acting as if it was a permanent change to a webpage no one visits.

It's not their fault if your brain misinterprets the information it reads.

They wrote "being featured on the Simpsons, one of TV’s most popular shows."

Are the Simpsons one if the most popular TV shows?
Yes!

Where did they officially announced that it was featured in a TV episode?
They didn't.

It appears in the official Simpson comics.
https://www.zipcomic.com/simpsons-comics-issue-37
Page 6 (see pic)
Happy reading, retard.

Was APU.com featured in the Simpsons?
Yes!
in the official Simpsons comics.

>The High Council bought APU through a company that claims "We keep domain name registrants' identities secret"
Privacy is a fundamental right, wanna dox your identity here ANON?

>Why should we trust people that anonymously bought a website and won't reveal how much they actually bought it for?
Because it doesn't matter if they bought it for $100 or $1M, what matter is that from now on APU.com, a premium 3 letter .com domain is owned by the APU crypto.
Don't trust them, you don't matter.

>Why did the 2 top whales that sold APU for nearly a mil or over a mil go all in on PEPE

Because people can do whatever they want with their money.
I can sell all my APUs and buy PBUTT, why would you care, fucking retard.

You're technically right.

But it still appears in the official Simpson comics.
https://www.zipcomic.com/simpsons-comics-issue-37
Page 6

Happy reading, retard.