/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>3719546
That is a tricky question. There is what was pointed out earlier (>>3719244), but there are other particulars. I mean, unlike Kyber and 0x, the exchange goes live ASAP. Throw in the fact the fact that its being marketed to Wall Street like crazy right now AND that their roadmap indicates a bunch of things coming up relatively soon.

So really, it depends on how much usage picks up once it goes live. I'll make a decision once I start seeing the numbers.

>>3719563
Technically I can't participate since I'm in the US. Trying to see if I can ride with someone. Might put in a minor amount, but I still need to make a firm decision.

However, a bit of notice: there are other ICOs coming up in October that haven't caught attention yet that are also promising. So I'm trying to be careful with my money.

>>3719596
>>3719614
>>3719624
Nothing yet, apart from being active in some discord servers. I'm increasingly being asked to consider setting up a newsletter of some kind.

>>3719679
Again, this is a project tailored to attract institutions. Just yesterday we learned that Goldman Sachs wants to get in on the Bitcoin trading game. And plenty of people believe Jamie Dimon talked shit about Bitcoin in an attempt to buy up a huge chunk when it was low.
>https://www.wsj.com/articles/goldman-sachs-explores-a-new-world-trading-bitcoin-1506959128
So I'm wondering what will happen when these types of players start wanting to seriously engage in ERC-20 OTC token trading.

>>3719709
Depends what the Airswap team wants to do. Incentive for partnerships, more fund raising for expansion plans, making sure there is a supply for institutional participants who want to buy in, etc. What is sure is that after 6 months, they'll be tradeable.

Keep in mind that most ICOs do something like this these days.