/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19738114
>Then why are you pretending jpow won't buy fagman+ bonds because of low yield when he literally said he was "only" buying "good" (i.e. low yield) bonds?
That's how you interpret that?
Sounds more like
>d-don't worry, we're not printing money by lending directly to companies that are likely going to default, every company that we lend to is GOOD and not dangerous toxic debt!

>>19738114
>They are 'safe' because if they're bailed out, they can 'never fail'
MSFT and AAPL have plenty of money, and can get more by running to the credit market whenever they want. I don't know why you think the fed would want to throw more money at them. Are you aware of how much demand there was for fucking Carnival's debt? ZIRP and NIRP worldwide... people want to put cash to work and there's a lot more to big tech than the debt on their balance sheets.

Shit, MSFT and JNJ are the only US corporations with AAA balance sheets. The credit agencies aren't perfect, but that tells you something.

>>19738154
BLM and reparations any shit like that are just excuses to print money. Do you think they could sell the public on the idea of a deflationary spiral?

>TOO MANY DIFFERENT STOCKS
>really want to buy the dip in LULU though
thoughts?

>>19724654
>RTX immune but not BA
you're a retard and I'm sick of explaining this to you.
But I just bought back into AMD on friday. If it tanks, that's just too bad. I'm also bagholding TSMC, and I might rather add to that instead.

Buy the dip in LMT if we get one.