/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>20086737
It can't scale to 50 transactions per day for every human on earth, and being forced anon is inconvenient for some transactions and getting accepted in some countries and stores. Better to have BCHs 'cash fusion' optional anon.

>>17152349
Everyone on BSV will move to BCH in the long term because it's a better product. BCH is the real Bitcoin Cash, and much more useful as it kept improving (notably privacy and block compression for 95.4% reduced bandwidth) rather than "locking down the protocol" to feed CSWs ego.
As a Cashier, I do think CSW was involved in the early Satoshi team, but more as a hype man. He didn't make any key insights.

>>16952984
>>16953036
>>16953075
>>16953226
>>16953516
Miners giveth, and miners taketh away. It is not possible for this to work if the majority of miners don't agree. That is how Bitcoin decision making is supposed to work. Not sneaky blockstream forcing through decisions while everyone is confused. This is a shining light of real Bitcoin decision making, the first real unified one. The miners decision to support BCH over BSV in the hashwar is one other which has been taken, but it wasn't at this level of creativity.
This is fantastic for real Bitcoin BCH, I think we will see some incredible development soon as the most useful money.
And if the right development isn't happening to pump the bags, then, miners will wield their power again, and endow a different entity to make winning changes happen.

>>16895601
Bitcoin Cash scales about 100 times better than version 0.1 outdated bloated SV, they used new proven ideas to compress the blocksize by exactly 99.4%.

SV did do some nice tests which BCH will use the results of when it becomes necessary. 32 mb blocks is already enough to process more transactions than PayPal.

SV is the testnet for BCH the real Bitcoin.

Bitcoin Cash can scale 200 times better than BSV thanks to Graphene and Canonical Transaction Ordering.
You know... upgrades.
The things Bitcoin used to be back when it was useful.
Bitcoin cash can also do privacy just as good as monero with Cash shuffle, and it can do Tokens better than Ethereum with SLP.
Of course BTC is totally dead.
Bitcoin Cash is the real Bitcoin, with real world adoption, ease of use, top wallet when you search for Bitcoin.

Has everything BSV has, plus 10 times more because BCH continues to improve.

>>16463847
>>16463868
Two more retards appear. Hello special little boys.

Read carefully: Bitcoin Cash can scale 200 times better than BSV thanks to Graphene and Canonical Transaction Ordering.
You know... upgrades.
The things Bitcoin used to be back when it was useful.
Bitcoin cash can also do privacy just as good as monero with Cash shuffle, and it can do Tokens better than Ethereum with SLP.
Of course BTC is totally dead.
Bitcoin Cash is the real Bitcoin, with real world adoption, ease of use, top wallet when you search for Bitcoin.

Has everything BSV has, plus 10 times more because BCH continues to improve.

>>16457373
>>16457132
The logo was designed to appeal to egos of (mostly Chinese) miners at the time of the hash war with ABC.
ABC won anyway, and continues to stay ahead because it has an awesome roadmap for usefulness to all humans.

>>16454393
You mistyped BCH, which, thanks to BIP improvements every 6 months (you know the way Bitcoin used to be) is able to scale much more easily than outdated "set in stone" BSV. (99.4% block compression with graphene and CTOR means BCH can get nearly 200 times more transactions in per MB than v0.1 BSV, no need for the terabyte blocks which Nchain is kindly testing for eventual inclusion in Bitcoin (BCH) at civilization scale in 2030

>>16445936
This is a shill.
No one who does serious research can miss how many broken promises cref has, and how weak set-in-stone (stone age more like) BSV really is compared to progressive BCH which continues to improve usefulness for users

>>16321338
https://news.bitcoin.com/bitcoin-com-to-launch-200-million-bch-ecosystem-investment-fund/

Bitcoin.com CEO Stefan Rust has been screening institutional investment companies and has identified up to 20 that align with the company’s vision and satisfy its stringent due diligence requirements. Bitcoin.com would charge a fee helping institutional investors manage the fund, on top of the fees to access the underlying payment businesses. Institutions are said to be very interested in investing alongside Roger Ver and Bitcoin.com, taking a share in the upside of future BCH development.

“We are super excited to launch the $200 million ecosystem fund that will rapidly scale up Bitcoin Cash focused businesses,” stated Bitcoin.com CEO Stefan Rust. “Bitcoin.com receives between 6 to 8 business plans every day from software entrepreneurs leveraging the unique features and capabilities of the Bitcoin Cash blockchain. Bitcoin.com now has the resources and team to support these BCH entrepreneurs, grow the value of their businesses and spread bitcoin cash adoption.”

>>16291225
Cheers, I was looking for it.
Needs to be updated now though, red x on reversible transactions.
And SV 0-conf is not as secure as BCH now that avalanche pre-consensus is being activated.

>>16169546
>>16169739
Nice idea, I like the vision, very futuristic and I could see how that would work.
But such an application could just as easily be built on BCH, and in all likelihood will be, because BCH continued with the Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs) which Satoshi started. Craig and Nchain rolled the protocol back to 0.1, locked it down unfinished.
Anyway, BCH is more private, and more useful with SLP tokens, and more secure with avalanche, and gets 99.4% more transactions through in the same MB of blocksize thanks to Graphene and Canonical Transaction Ordering (doesn't need to raise the blocksize because kept improving the tech) soon it will be completed and locked down too, the best most useful Bitcoin with the widest adoption.

>>15830389
The problems in Bitcoin which it tried to solve are better solved by Bitcoin (now that the real Bitcoin is back in BCH and development is advancing rapidly towards perfect money Litecoin is not needed, and BTC is super not needed)

>>15241205
Bitcoin Core, the fake and subverted segwit lightning Bitcoin (Bitcoin husk as I like to call it because it give the correct image) will fall from it's top spot to become boomers trading cards.
The real Bitcoin in everyway except the ticker symbol, will reassert itself.
Already zero-conf is secure enough to buy up to $1000 worth of coffee.
Next hard fork avalanche consensus will be implemented and you can do millions securely instantly.
Bitcoin is fine, and effective, and still unstoppable. It just changed ticker symbol because of some political subversion.

>>15092217
Hmm, the thing is, the blocks don't need to get bigger to execute the usecase outlined in the Bitcoin whitepaper(peer to peer cash)
32mb is enough to get to PayPal levels of transactions. And when we OG bitcoiners get there, the blocksize will be lifted, with much code and ideas copied from the big-block testnet called BSV. So everyone is thankful for the work SV devs have done so far to prove big blocks.
Bitcoin ABC stands for Adjustable Block Cap. The size will be lifted along with demand. I donhols a small suicide stack of BSV. My only prayer is: May the best Bitcoin win, and free humanity.

>>14574720
Bitcoin Cash has already implemented graphine and Canonical transaction records (it was the reason for the hashwar and BSV fork of Bitcoin cash being created (BSV lost the hashwar btw, which means more miners preferred the BCH roadmap))
Anyway, basically these improvements greatly reduced the overhead for transferring blocks around a distributed network, it's almost like you get big blocks in a much smaller package, 99.4% smaller than core of BSV to be accurate.
BSV has publicly stated they want to roll back on Bitcoin Ver 0.1 and make no improvements, when statoshi himself was the one who began the BIPs (Bitcoin Improvement Proposals).

>>14388888
Rolled back to outdated Ver 0.1 of Bitcoin.
Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIP) continue to happen, as they did under statoshi, on Bitcoin Cash, the Real Bitcoin. Still time to get it now for an easy 20x before for the flippening in a few years.

>>14381298
That what happens when you buy the outdated Bitcoin ver 0.1 while based Roger is building hi tech useful real Bitcoin BCH with exploring real-world use , and OG devs are steadily working to lock down the protocol.

>>14341748
This FUD is dumb, they already hit their 800 Bitcoin donation target. Devs are paid for now until the roadmap is complete and the protocol locked down, after which no more devs are needed.

>>14281814
Bitcoin (BCH) does it better

>>14073173
The ultimate peer to peer electronic cash system. Staying focused on the use case defined in the original Bitcoin whitepaper. Continuing to improve Bitcoin, rather than dragging it back to the dark ages.
It just werks.

>>13705097
I did it. I like the BCH roadmap better

>>13681952
A reasonable post sir, but consider that unlimited blocks are not yet needed, 32mb blocks put Bitcoin within the range that challenges PayPal (190 per sec) and visa (2000 per sec). Forcing bigger block only increases centralisation as smaller mining operators who can't afford monster servers and fiber pipes are forced out.
BCH will increase the blocksize when it is reasonable needed.
BSV is significantly changed from the original Bitcoin, and isn't locked down yet, still more OP codes that weren't in the original are being added.
Craig is not all of Satoshi, he may have been involved, but more as a hype man shitposting on the original forums to keep the project alive.
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/op-ed-how-many-wrongs-make-wright/

>>13673459
Huh, This was fixed.
Oh I see the problem, you're using an old husk of Bitcoin.
Bitcoin is still working great, just the ticker symbol changed, get with the program go to bitcoin.com, the most trusted name in crypto, to learn more.
Transactions confirmed in 3 seconds coming soon to the real Bitcoin (BCH)
Bitcoin Cash is Bitcoin.