/biz/ - Business & Finance

If you can afford to burn a little money, sell some BTC to a wagie HODLer and burn their fiat. This is a war we are about to lose and now is our chance to strike. Their unbanked economy is our chance to hurt their CBDC.

But if you really want to make a change while sitting on your ass you need to offer risky loans to people willing to build a business from scratch. Your business doesn't have to profit, encouraging it's use increases the value of your holdings.

1/2
Crypto Constitution.

Preamble:
We the people of the digital identity government establish this constitution to ensure the effective management, protection, and utilization of assets in a manner that promotes efficiency in trade and the health and well-being of humans.

Article I: Definitions
This constitution defines assets as any item of value owned by the government, including physical and digital goods, property, currency, and other assets.

Article II: Asset Management
All assets owned by the government will be managed according to established procedures for asset management, which will include a complete inventory of all assets, as well as policies for secure storage, transportation, and exchange of assets.

Article III: Asset Handling
The government will determine whether an asset should be handled physically or digitally based on the nature of the asset, its value, its portability, its durability, and its susceptibility to damage or theft. The government will also establish procedures for handling each type of asset to ensure efficient, secure, and safe management.

Article IV: Digital Asset Management
The government will utilize digital technologies to facilitate the management and exchange of assets whenever possible, provided that such technologies do not compromise the security or privacy of the asset or the individuals involved in the transaction.

Article V: Physical Asset Management
For physical assets that must be handled, the government will establish procedures for secure transportation, storage, and exchange to ensure the safety of the asset and the individuals involved.

If we only had 1 crypto and utilization/services were voted on, is botting really a problem?

If someone bi-passes a bunch of gateways to getting multiple votes, doesn't that just make it a necessary service that should be included and would be used?

If someone takes a piece of the blockchain and uses it for some nefarious purpose, do we not still just have the ability to not use/ignore the service?

I guess the space isn't exactly infinite but it should have a growth design should it not? One that maybe absorbs redundent pieces of work. Repurposes it for a more global well rounded use.

Let me put it this way. If a picture sharing site bans porn, we then need a second site to host it. But as the internet grows we find ways to seperate that content but leave it on the same platform (or chain so to speak)

Isn't the point of a free system that anybody can do what they want? 4chan has been left to its own corner of the internet for quite some time now. I'm sure some people have come after it but the pure existance of this space makes it evident to me that we aren't too concerned about "criminal activity"

and I truly do believe in a free system there would be incredibly less need for crime. More so each day as technology evolves and more ideas are sourced and implemented.

I just ask all these questions because it seems backwards to power this business sector with money. We should have a true democratic public chain that gets voted on like Pi and their hackathons.

The point is to not have a corporate head. But you pour money in to vote just like a politician.

Whats worse is you're just hoping that you'll end up more valuable than the elites. Like they don't all have their own small piles of bitcoin.

What if your job was to do push-ups from 9-5?

Sure maybe you could do that if you only had to do a push-up every 10 minutes.

But hear me out. We went from a 70 hour work week to a 30 hour work week while doing the same theoretical pushups. How? we let the body rest. We did more less often.

The thing is that: now business wants to repurpose those extra 40 hours into more work. But the human body can't handle doing push-ups every minute for 8 hours.

So why are some people so insistant that we should spend more time not resting? You seem to be happier with a 70 hour work week and 30 hour output. Do you not see the benefits?

pic unrelated.