[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search: disraeli


View post   

>> No.55619167 [View]

Was Disraeli a Bizraeli?

>> No.52970138 [View]

>>52969158
Socialism, obviously.

Capitalism by definition means "an economic and social regime in which Capital, the source of income, does not generally belong to those who make it work through their labor."

More specifically:

>The term "capitalist", meaning an owner of capital, appears earlier than the term "capitalism" and dates to the mid-17th century. "Capitalism" is derived from capital, which evolved from capitale, a late Latin word based on caput, meaning "head"—which is also the origin of "chattel" and "cattle" in the sense of movable property (only much later to refer only to livestock). Capitale emerged in the 12th to 13th centuries to refer to funds, stock of merchandise, sum of money or money carrying interest.[20]:232[21] By 1283, it was used in the sense of the capital assets of a trading firm and was often interchanged with other words—wealth, money, funds, goods, assets, property and so on.[20]:233

>The Hollantse (German: holländische) Mercurius uses "capitalists" in 1633 and 1654 to refer to owners of capital.[20]:234 In French, Étienne Clavier referred to capitalistes in 1788,[22] four years before its first recorded English usage by Arthur Young in his work Travels in France (1792).[21][23] In his Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (1817), David Ricardo referred to "the capitalist" many times.[24] English poet Samuel Taylor Coleridge used "capitalist" in his work Table Talk (1823).[25] Pierre-Joseph Proudhon used the term in his first work, What is Property? (1840), to refer to the owners of capital. Benjamin Disraeli used the term in his 1845 work Sybil.[21]

>> No.52961861 [View]

>>52961844
>The term "capitalist", meaning an owner of capital, appears earlier than the term "capitalism" and dates to the mid-17th century. "Capitalism" is derived from capital, which evolved from capitale, a late Latin word based on caput, meaning "head"—which is also the origin of "chattel" and "cattle" in the sense of movable property (only much later to refer only to livestock). Capitale emerged in the 12th to 13th centuries to refer to funds, stock of merchandise, sum of money or money carrying interest.[20]:232[21] By 1283, it was used in the sense of the capital assets of a trading firm and was often interchanged with other words—wealth, money, funds, goods, assets, property and so on.[20]:233

>The Hollantse (German: holländische) Mercurius uses "capitalists" in 1633 and 1654 to refer to owners of capital.[20]:234 In French, Étienne Clavier referred to capitalistes in 1788,[22] four years before its first recorded English usage by Arthur Young in his work Travels in France (1792).[21][23] In his Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (1817), David Ricardo referred to "the capitalist" many times.[24] English poet Samuel Taylor Coleridge used "capitalist" in his work Table Talk (1823).[25] Pierre-Joseph Proudhon used the term in his first work, What is Property? (1840), to refer to the owners of capital. Benjamin Disraeli used the term in his 1845 work Sybil.[21]

>> No.18705021 [View]

>>18704886
Why short, go long, coronavirus is a hoax nothing more than a flu, they lied with the infection rate, much higher than previously thought, thus lowering real death rate which has been inflated by hospitals to get more bux... Benjamin Disraeli said it "there are lies, damn lies and statistics"

>> No.15746301 [View]

>>15746213
>Plenty of other people are bitter and think that the future is completely fucked. You're not exactly an outsider for having that sentiment.

I am not being elitist here, but for me the downfall of West has started long before we were even born: something shady happened during the French Revolution, as pointed by many others, and these can only be attributed so as to different 'secret influences' that even Disraeli talked about.

>Seek God if you haven't.
Well I certainly do believe we are in the End Times. Not biblical end times, but rather all-encompassing Kali Yuga, the age of total dissolution of the Hindu mythology or the "Age of Iron" of Hesod: even Islamic end-times.

The modern subversion cannot be stopped currently, it has it's roots in the French Revolution, perhaps even earlier: this is just the natural outcome of it. This applies democratic and liberal ideas; the so-called Third Estate had purposely been mobilized to destroy the previous feudal and aristocratic society in the revolution, while in a second phase the workers were mobilized to undermine the bourgeois what happened here in Europe and Russia.

The last stage is the collectivist civilization of the Fourth Estate that probably ties with the total automated society of the "Fourth Industrial Revolution", perhaps some sort of Universal Basic Income will be implemented: the human form itself will be destroyed as even the current state is some sort of infra-human limbo kind of state. Man is already a machine, perhaps trans-humanism achieves this also in the physical plane, but mentally and spiritually modern man is no more a human, or what the ancients understood as constituting a human.

Modern psychoanalysis does not believe in spirit, there is only the body and psyche. While in reality the ancients conceived man in every possible tradition as a triune being: body, mind and spirit: the 20th century was able to destroy such considerations for there is no room for Spirit (or God).

>> No.15746060 [View]
File: 8 KB, 309x163, disraeli.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15746060

>>15745982
>>15746054

Last quote by Benjamin Disraeli:
>The public does not realize that in all the conflicts within nations and in the conflicts between nations there are, besides the people apparently responsible for them, hidden agitators who with their selfish plans make these conflicts unavoidable. . . . Everything that happens in the confused evolution of peoples is secretly prepared in order to ensure the dominion of certain people: it is these people, known and unknown, that we must find behind every public event.

>> No.15746054 [View]

>>15745982
It is not as if I was attacking against the effiency of such (education) system. First of all, every assumption or observation I make must have the character of what are called "working hypotheses" in scientific research—as when something is admitted provisionally, rathern than just allowing the gathering and arranging of a group of apparently isolated facts, only to confer on them a character not of hypothesis, but of simple subjective opinions.

After considering the state of society and modern civilization, one should ask if this is not a specific case that requires the application of this method; in other words, one should ask whether some situations of real crisis and radical subversion (or even brainwashing) in the modern world can be satisfactorily explained through "natural" and spontaneous processes, or whether we need to refer to something that has been concerted, a still unfolding plan devised by forces or unknown intelligence that definitely have a more throughout understanding of the general plan in question through their knowledge of the current geopolitical, technological and all-encompassing psychological state of the current societal structure.

Benjamin Disraeli once wrote:
>"The world is governed by people entirely different from the ones imagined by those who are unable to see behind the scenes."

Where it is scientifically acknowledged that every disease of the individual organism is caused by bacteria, people pretended that the diseases of the social body—revolutions and disorders—are spontaneous, self-generated phenomena and "natural progress of societal history": rather than the effect of invisible agents, carefully planned actions that act in society the way bacteria and pathogenic germs act in the organism of the individual.

>> No.11636456 [View]

>>11636414
what out anon, that one OCD spaz anon is going to show up and mention disraeli

>> No.11370934 [View]

>>11370875
Nevermind. He actually did fucking told someone that Disraeli coined the term Capitalism. You need to pay attention more comrade.

>> No.11370772 [View]

>>11370728
No you didn't. You are literally lying right now to try and win an argument and are too stupid to realize I can easily prove that I was the only person to point it out and there are only THREE mentions of him on this board. Two of which were me with the third being you right now.

>>/biz/?task=search&ghost=&search_text=disraeli

Choke on it you lying subversive communist piece of shit.

>> No.11370728 [View]

>>11370624
How many people do you think post on biz?
what on gods green earth makes you think i'm the same person?
Last time I saw someone making the claim that marx coined the term capitalism, I too told them it was disraeli.

>> No.11370477 [View]

>>11370458
Benjamin Disraeli came up with the term.

>> No.11081368 [View]

>>11081218
Marx didn't coin the term faggot.

Try looking up Benjamin Disraeli who Marx stole the term from.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]