/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19935344
>ID:tip

tip: Buy Chainlink

>>19889677
>But are you sure that your shitcoins will moon?

Yes

>>19838915
BASED

>>19776227
>https://blog.chain.link/what-is-a-blockchain-and-how-can-it-impact-the-world/
>looks like they're really coordinating closely with the WEF
>what was that about a "great reset" that we keep hearing?
>is this what is meant by June 21st 2020?
>>>19768777
>>are you ready for the new world?
>>>19768796
>>>19771602
>>Seriously though if there is some Chainlink related, or World Economic Forum related, or some blockchain related news on 21st June I will never ever doubt the schizos ever again

The new blogpost smells of a coordinated campaign with the WEF and I'm a bit torn. Imagine, our wildest dreams may come true financially, but we are now one of "them".

>>19728813
>What are the most undervalued Polkadot gems?

read as
>Which of these coins will go up in value the most?

Which one do you think?
>inb4 noNOnOOO not that one! I mean something that will go up the value the MOST!

Yes, i know. You already know the answer.

wow this looks like a potentially very promising project

if only there was some project that DMM DAO used in its core functionality, something that DMMDAO would have to pay every single time any action on the protocol occurs
it would be even cooler if that other project at the center of DMMDAOs core functionality was also at the center of hundreds of other projects core functionality

you could simply invest in this other token and be gaurunteed to reap the rewards if any of these hundreds of projects succeed, DMM included, increasing your risk tolerance by almost infinite amounts

oh well since im not aware of any such project I guess ill just purely invest in this one singular project and pray to god that there aren't any major technical issues that result in its failure

>>19680312
wow this looks like a potentially very promising project

if only there was some project that DMM DAO used in its core functionality, something that DMMDAO would have to pay every single time any action on the protocol occurs
it would be even cooler if that other project at the center of DMMDAOs core functionality was also at the center of hundreds of other projects core functionality

you could simply invest in this other token and be gaurunteed to reap the rewards if any of these hundreds of projects succeed, DMM included, increasing your risk tolerance by almost infinite amounts

oh well since im not aware of any such project I guess ill just purely invest in this one singular project and pray to god that there aren't any major technical issues that result in its failure

>>19657719
A small background about me, been on biz since early 2017, bought LINK on etherdelta directly after the ICO

Why didn't I buy at ICO? Well my friend, the LINK ICO was special and had a pooled setup which, at the time, seemed really weird and sketchy to me. Anons were shilling their pools and I was too stupid to understand why this ICO was behaving different than any other ICO I had ever seen.

Needless to say, I read through the whitepaper, did my due diligence on the oracle problem, and here I am. With 50k LINK 3 years later.

Seeing people scramble like rats to find promising projects when literally every single one of them has already announced they will be using LINK

>DMM DAO
>AAVE
>Zilliqa
>Hedera
>ARPA
>Loopring
>Reserve
>Harmony
>Kyber
>WAX
the list goes on

You can literally just look through the catalog at every single little rat trying to shill their favorite project and theres a 90% chance it has publicly stated it will use LINK

I am just so fucking comfy. There is no reason to own anything else. If any of these projects grow exceptionally, LINK holders will reap the rewards. It's a universal lottery ticket.

>>18564966
>52,000

top 100 wallets accumulated about 7-8 million tokens in the past week until now
we are so close. hold tight

>>17611573
mfw 90% of my net worth is in LINK

>>17607561
but anon im already exposed to HBAR success because i own LINK

>>17557777
Your digits just made me realize that >>17777777 isn't too far off. What will the prophecy be this time?

>>17499252
thanks anon, and to think ive been doing it this way for the past 2 and a half years

oh well i guess it wont matter too much in the end

>>17473671
but mine is

>>17470821
i have 11k LINK

10k i will quite literally never sell, only stake. and i will sell staking rewards
the other 1k i plan to sell in increments, beginning at $100

>>17439890
cope

>>17431383
>They would change nothing in people's day to day lives and would solely be beneficial for heads of industry.
nobody is arguing that smart contracts will change day to day lives of ordinary nobodies

in fact, the idea is that it will be completely indistinguishable from current user interface and user experiences
the fact that its beneficial for industry/enterprises is the reason that its so valuable.

if $BigCompany$ can save 5% annually via smart contracts, and lay off 1000 employees, then they will. and the protocols/products that facilitate this transition will reap the rewards of this transition.

>>17389292
>everything

>everything else pumps
>link doesnt go up a penny
>everything else dumps
>link goes up

i guess that anon yesterday was right, LINK consistently pumps after everything else.
ask yourself why this may be?

and once you find the answer to this question, you'll realize why im just so fucking comfy.

>>17125428
not much tonight
but a lambo in december

>>16806675
if only there was a coin that has actual tangible use that every single person on biz recognized as being useful before the ICO ever began

and if only that coin slowly climbed and climbed from the depths of the top 200 to its rightful place in the top 20, showcasing that genuine meaningful utility is in fact relevant to valuation, therefore disproving your ape-brain argument that value in this market has no meaning

>>16778140
KEK made the prophecy long ago. This thread confirms his will.