/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>4842904

Out of curiousity, since we broke 5k the second time, has a single anon successfully done this strategy?

You're talking a lot of shit, but that's ok, the true believers will be made billionaires soon enough.

>>4902756
>>4902757
>>4902801
The faithful know where to find me.
All others are damned.

Btw I'm not the real AssBlaster, if you had read all his threads you'd know that his trip was cracked, and he's using a new one now.

>>4902887
>>4902892
I should have kept it going, but I am a believer in AssBlaster, so I couldn't do that to the cause. Consdier this a public service.

hey guys its me

>>4904016
btc been stagnating so long and futures around the corner, bought in ltc at 140$. we going to $200 tonight baby

>>4905421
bought in $10k at .015. Looks like i dun goofed
put in a sell order at .015 tho, lets see if it moons again while i shleep :')

i swear if i wake up to a JUSTing ill shove a litecoin up my ass

>>4905444
nigga wtf. i tried to transfer a mere 5/50 ltc from bittrex to coinbase for arb and it stalled for 40 fucking minutes. THIS IS BULLSHIT

literally couldve made racks off this. fuck crypto for real man :/

>>4905590
you did better than 99.99% people on this dumb ass board. cys (congrat ur self) you faggot

>>4909178
Hey, AssBlaster, you fucked up, I know it's you. You are seriously fucked, you've LARPed hard enough already, yeah?
Delete this post and never come back to /biz/ again, thanks.
>>4909197
Him samefagging to make it sound like he was getting a full bitcoin

>>4909223

>>4909242
I go hard on LARPers, by the way, I strongly believe OP is also AssBlaster, same writing style, same time zone, avatarfagging. It all adds up.

>>4909270
Kill yourself.

I have a bit of news I'd like to share, it is speculative but I'll be providing evidence. Evaluate it yourselves.

First of all just to reiterate for everyone claiming I was involved with the medium article a week ago, I clearly denounced it as soon as I read the article, I only saw the headline and clearly some elaborate con artist used the name of a private equity firm in London, (but his was based in LA), knowing that confirmation bias would lead people to believe it had to do with me. FYI Signal Capital in London does not just deal in real estate like some anon said, but they handle all kinds of illiquid equity and yes people from that firm still hang around in the same circles as people from my firm, so I just assumed that CL was generating interest at a faster rate and my firm weren't as early an adopter we thought. Either way we would not communicate these purchases with each other because of insider trading and NDAs (hence the rush for gov't to regulate cryptos, all the potential backstabbing is hindering corporate progress).

>>4940260

So the news I offer today, I was talking to someone about LINK, and long story short the main reason Sergey has been so absent lately is because of the upgrade to Go. It was totally unexpected and is a serious curveball for him. It's really putting a big delay on everything. So now you're wondering, 'Why upgrade to go?' and the reason lies in Native Client, a Google sandbox that ChainLink hopes to incorporate into their product. I am not a CS guy so I don't know how exactly Google sandbox works, you can read about it here:

http://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en/us/pubs/archive/34913.pdf

Anyways the rumour is Google in general is slowly pushing forward an entire ecosystem around data APIs in the future, basically Google wants to monopolise data and they see this potential ecosystem as the next 'evolutionary step' in the Google platform. Think of like GPS, weather, transporation, space etc all at a military level of precision. Go somehow ties into all this, again not a CS guy so Go might not be suitable necessarily for the actual analysis of this data, but it is important.

>>4940282

What evidence do I have of this? Ripple once used a Smart Oracle technology called Codius, the white paper is not unlike ChainLinks, albeit lacking in the decentralisation/node concept, anyways Codius was deployed using Chain (https://chain.com) an enterprise level blockchain deployment software that is ACTIVELY working with Visa, Nasdaq, Citigroup, Capital One, Orange, State Street, etc. This is the Goliath that Sergey needs to slay. Sergey needs to prove to these megacorps that the idea of Oracles built on decentralised tokens shared between NEETs on 4chan is actually worthwhile in the long run. Corporations much prefer exclusive/enterprise grade software, than participating in something that will make other people rich. It’s also why Sergey needs to reinforce them that LINK is *not* a speculative asset, pumping the price and marketing his product like OMG will actively undo everything he’s been working on.

So here’s the final kicker, check Chain.com’s github: https://github.com/chain/chain

Notice anything?

Chain.com has been built on Go, but as everyone here said Go is a pos language, so why would they build an enterprise blockchain on it/

>>4940312

Then just explain why an Enteprise blockchain company like Chain.com, is built on Go? Chain openly works for/with Visa and all the companies I mentioned above.

>>4940394

I'm actually hoping to have a discussion about this information. I trust the source but he is a second hand source himself, so it would be nice to have a discussion of where the reasoning might be wrong etc. I want to be refuted if possible but the logic checks out.

Look at ING and Req, corporations are *very* skittish about anything from an ICO, not just because of insider trading laws but because they don't feel comfortable working with a company that deploys tokens to millions of nobodies before developing a product. They prefer tailor made enterprise grade software, which is why Sergey is doing everything he can to be taken seriously, i.e. not constantly reaching out to the community (i.e. us).

>>4940470

So we went from 'ChainLink is a joke and won't be taken seriously because they're using Go' to 'lots of serious firms with partnerships with megacoporations and banks use Go, but only because they're retarded', at the end of the day it doesn't matter *why* ChainLink uses Go, as long as it gets those same partnerships.

>>4940587

That's why Link can very much be seen as 'a third wave' technology, the reason so many people are buying this and planning to just HODL until 2020+ is because Link's success is not only contingent on Sergey delivering a working product, but on blockchain and decentralisation become a truly mainstream part of society. I don't just mean mainstream like your average joe knows about it. Think of it this way, right now bitcoin = speculative, but what is it speculative of? The very real possibility that decentralisation will become intrinsic to the coporate and commercial delivery systems of the future. In other words if this extremely unlikely scenario happens where there is a *real* paradigm shift, where instead of being a decentralisation_of_x ERC20 token is seen as a PLUS by these corporations. If a true revolution happens and all of this stuff is embraced the way the internet was ultimately embraced then ChainLink will be at an advantage to this proprietary stuff.

>>4940601

It isn't a question of institutional incentive, it's more that although blockchain is taken seriously, tokens and ICOs and all this decentralised ownership stuff isn't taken seriously yet. There is new ground to be broken, new laws to be made, no company wants to break rank first. The issue isn't with incentive, it's with the necessity for a paradigm shift, right now Visa takes one look at LINK and the ICO and the community of shitposters and it goes running towards companies offering a more private/proprietary solution (Ripple), this is going to take time to overcome.

>>4940814

Consider that Oracle APIs will be an industry worth hundreds of billions within a decade, and a trillion dollar industry by 2030. Consider automation: our economy is going to rapidly restructure itself as a data-driven economy instead of a labour/production-driven economy. ChainLink does not need to monopolise the market in order to be valueable any more than Bitcoin needs to replace banking to be worth 300BN. For highly sensitive Oracles we may end up relying on some sort of foundation consisting of players like Oracle and Palantir, but ChainLink could still be a valuable decentralised network, no one says it's going to be used for warhead targeting.

>>4941107

It really does though, statistically throughout history those who innovate first tend to succeed. Link is poised to become the dominant force in trustless Oracles. Even if it gets replaced down the line, the potential upside is massive. Your argument is sort of like not buyin Ethereum in 2016 because Cardano will replace it in 2018.

>>4941477

Because Link is the only one developing TRUSTLESS Oracles. Keyword is trustless. Your argument is like saying Eth can never compete with a Smart Contract service developed by a giant corporation. The point is right now decentralisation, of the type Bitcoin and Ethereum represent, is a buzzword. It is yet to be seen whether these will transcend into an entirely new way of doing things. If they do then Link will have the advantage that it was done via decentralised token offering, vs a proprietary piece of enterprise software. Again there is a real chance that decentralisation and blockchain becomes a buzzword and dies out

>>4941605

It is what it is, Sergey has a hard sell in front of him, but the potential upside is massive.