/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>6462892
Sounds like you follow me on Tweeter.

>>6487346
In 3 months there will be a working product and marketing efforts. Maybe other exchange listings. What is the actual value of staking? Speculation of those returns will drive the price past any reasonable figure.

>>6488627
That bottle should be full of piss.

>>6493154

I’m sorry you feel that way, anon.

>>6493483

Fantastic contribution to the discourse, friend.

>>6515092
Legend has it they Skype every night before sleepy night nights time.

>>6516531
That chairforce faggot in Hawaii accidentally hit the incoming missile alarm button twice and sent all those tree niggers into disarray. Pretty funny. Anyway people hit buttons and delete things all the time. Unless you actually see missiles inbound just relax. Stop being such a spaz. It's probably nothing.

>>6517150
It's too late. Flush yourself down the toilet, heathen.

>>6519282

You rang, faggot?

AssBlaster here. I'm not AssBlaster. Now mind your own fucking business, will you?

Good bye stinky. I'll miss you. :(

>>6530706
>>6530715
>>6530743
don't be s..sad.. stinky is at a b..better place now. :.(

>>6548029
You should sell now.

>>6564707

Some of you guys are smarter than I thought. Using phone right now (travelling) hence using my less secure trip code (secure trip code is on laptop and I haven’t memorised it because it’s very complex).

Remember what I said: you guys were never meant to have been able to buy LINK. It was supposed to be ICO *only* and with the pool requirements etc to prevent redditors and small fish from being in on it. Whilst also allowing for ChainLINK to promote itself as having done an ICO.

Why did the ICO matter? Because if you do your research you’ll find that SWIFT is actually pushing for an open banking inititiative and explicitly states that they want to achieve this via “community driven decentralised networks”.

Those who are persistent will find these documents. They were also handed out to many banks and insurance firms but public records do exist if you look closely. I’ll post these documents in a week or so, curious to see how many of you find them in the meantime.

>>6566306

Did you read the post I replied to? ERC-20 tokens can be freely traded. Most exchanges seek permission, binance didn’t because they were just getting as many tokens as possible to boost their stats. It’s about courtesy, not law. Welcome to decentralised markets.

>>6566191

SWIFT wants a community driven platform, they want something that appeals to corporations and high ups, they do not want a bunch of memes and emojis about mooning all over Twitter. They launch an ICO that was notoriously difficult to get into so that the right people could buy in (high value individuals), however due to the anonymity they can then CLAIM that they followed through with their plan of having a “community driven” network for bank information tx’s, and not a “currency” for “cryptotraders”

You know how you guys are always saying “oh the banks will make their own version” THATS EXACTLY WHAT THEY DID. It’s their token through and through, the only reason it’s being traded is because that’s an inherent feature of blockchains and decentralisation. If they could deliste it they would but not without it then becoming a centralised coin and therefore defeating the whole purpose of ushering a new wave of open banking. This is what I’ve been trying to explain, ChainLINK is basically a secret project that by its nature MUST be openly developed, so the entire goal is to keep it as under the radar as possible until the exact right moment. This is what I’ve been hinting at with singularity etc, if you read between the lines you’ll understand. Blockchain is this bizarre nexus where it’s incredibly useful enterprise technology but it’s also highly transparent and accessible to the “wrong” people, (if you want to have a real DLT, and not be Ripple 2.0 which this very document explains why this needs to be different to ripple.

You guys are what they didn’t expect, or perhaps don’t care about (who would believe 4chan).

>>6567040

Close. The document I’m talking about is from when they head hunted Sergey. SWIFT is a cooperative, not a corporation, they aren’t going to start funding internal R&D for some proprietary blockchain that doesn’t fit with their corporate vision AT ALL. And PSD2 is a part of this, EU wants to push global open banking and standardisation, they just hate this speculative market bubble. So they found Sergey (I don’t know the full story, just bits and pieces) and they vetted him and began this project. He operates in a legal grey area because he is not their employee, but they work together very closely. The PoC was exactly that, a PoC of a project they had been working on together for over two years. SWIFT has been pushing for this stuff for years. Before this speculative bubble and the mass run of ICO scams. Hence they need to basically play their cards very carefully to launch ChainLINK as a NETWORK not a currency. The tokens are only one ERC-20 network to monetise rewards. In SWIFTS ideal world they’d be traded privately or decentralised exchanges, I really shouldn’t tell you this but long term there would be a single platform for trading LINK and node subscriptions etc, maybe I’ll give more details on that later. But naturally you guys started pooling and shilling and so now they just want you and your memes to go away while they revolutionise banking along with Europe to help maintain their own relevancy and also cement Europe as this bastion of free and open banking initiatives.

>>6567316

Clever. That’s one of two documents, the other started circulating in 2014 before Sergey was contracted or Ethereum even developed explaining their five year plan for reinventing banking. Now let that sink in, SWIFT has been working on this when BTC was at 300 USD, this was going to be their ace in the hole, and you ask why Sergey doesn’t keep you guys more up to date in the slack. You guys got a small taste of money funding absolute scam project pump and dumps and suddenly think you deserve to be updated with every little thing because “we are the investors” when the money you spent is a fraction of what SWIFT sand its banks have spent. The ICO is a formality and to kickstart the open network and also meant to act as a barrier for serious players. You guys lucked into the biggest blockchain project out there and act like your venture capitalists swinging your dicks around. Now answer me this, with all your DYOR why did it take you guys so long to find this document?

>>6567875

In traditional investment, 58 dollars is a good time to buy. 58 cents for LINK is like buying oil fields before cars were invented.

Also I said I would try not to shill buying, I try to direct my threads to LINK holders. I am not a shill.

>>6568116

Let me put it this way, LINK is not a currency. It wont “moon” it won’t “correct”, if LINK is what I have been told it is, if LINK does what SWIFT is planning for it to do, you need an entirely net lexicon for what will happen to LINK. It’s not going to be green candles and red candles of a speculates coin fluctuating. It’s going to be like the railways or oil fields. It’s going to be a proportional entitlement to the entire network of open banking. Secured via ethereum smart contracts to give out dividends, it will entitle you access to the defacto network of transparent decentralised banking. I’m not telling you to go out and buy it because it might be awhile and there’s no real rush, right now the market is bearish and you might get dumped on, but watch LINK closely because one day you’ll be able to buy it and one day you’ll have to pay huge sums of money to get a stake in one of the most significant networks for modern banking you can imagine.

I thought before that it would shoot up to 3 USD when partnerships would announce and then climb up but I’m starting to think this whole thing is going to drop with mainnets, partnerships, functional nodes all at once. Especially after seeing all the documents leaked from LINK recently. (Saved on laptop but they were posted here). This will be a currency traded for speculation until it becomes what is essentially a security, not in the legal sense but in the “this thing entitled me to a share of this network” and people will pay huge sums for that access.

By far the most misinformed statements are the ones about LINK not needing a token and the token having no value, if you guys saw the picture you’d understand. When I have my laptop I’ll possibly post more in depth explanations. I don’t know yet, it’s been a busy week.

>>6568702

I don’t know. It’s sort of a catch-22 because everyone will deny knowledge of 4chan so everyone is almost pretending you guys don’t exist. But the paranoid side of me does notice how the prices always dumps when I post. But this time it might be a coincidence.

>>6568820

250k atm but I will eventually have 1MM when I time My ETH sell. Like I said there is no real rush to buy it. Get yourself some suicide insurance (at least 10k so you don’t kill yourself if it hits 50 in a week) and then accumulate slow and steady.

I am tempted to the wallet thing but I’m afraid of too many potential avenues it could be traced back to me, if for example I accidentally send a colleague a LINK token from the same wallet etc.

Also a Fun game to occupy some of you NEETs whoever figured out why I use the AssBlaster tripcode can have 100 LINK when I get home. Don’t spam this thread with guesses, go out m, think about it, see if you can figure it out and drop your ideas in a separate thread.

>>6569136

Wrong and don’t guess here. There answer is completely obvious using information that is publicly available. Nothing connected to me on a personal level.

>>6569293
>>6569346

These two are both half right. It is an always sunny reference, but not to the bike (close though!) but a reference to Dennis talking about how the democrats and the republicans blast you in the ass no matter who you vote for. Highlights my view on bureaucracy and my dislike towards taxation and elitist power structures (in large part from personal experience) additionally if any coworkers discovers these threads (if they are scanning the internet for ChainLINK references) then they would have to go and speak to my boss and use the term AssBlaster repeatedly in conversation.

>>6569500

Decentralised community. I keep telling you, LINK has no value if the community is decentralised. Barriers to entry don’t exist so SWIFT can accumulate but so that the right people accumulate. They aren’t specific lists of people, rather serious investor type involved in finance and or tech who aren’t going to start memeing all over reddit.