/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>17015267
y u gotta be like dat bro

Sell walls are erecting. This thing's about to blow, boys

Dude chainlink

>>16991206
this is seriously bad. a sure sign that the link "project", if it can even be called such a thing, is entering its final phase, EXIT SCAM MODE

Startin to think it's ogre frens. We had a good run. Made some decent coin. Time to cash out the last of our link stashes and call it quits...

who is responsible

Tired of the pain... the humiliation.... the agony....

I'm from the area. Joe Maccarone is huge here. Everyone knows him, and he is widely respected in fintech circles. This is bad.

>hearing all these people talk about reaching 10k link
>they don't know the sad truth that once you get there all you can think about is why it isn't 100k
>t. 10k holder

>im a meme investor

Isn't Chainlink the pump and dump scam the news has been talking about?

when are we gonna stop deluding ourselves

i dont understand. we just partnered with microsoft...why aren't we pamin

no...please link...no....don't crash back to 50 cents! NOOOOOO I WANT TO BE RICH I WANT TO BE RICH I WANT TO BE FUCKING RIIIIIICH

98 cents

i-its going back up. maybe i'm not financially ruined.... maybe i will actually "make it" after all....

Dicks in our ass December

I wish I could still believe. But I just can't do it anymore. We all know we're gonna see $0.28 end of year. I can't bear to see it. I'm selling it all now and leaving crypto for good. Goodbye, biz. Goodbye...

Only until she’s back on her feet, says she’d do it for me, would I be an asshole if I lowered the percentage or said no altogether ?

radio silence for a full year, stealth, no hype/marketing (opposite of every single other project in the space)
every partnership is announced by the other party first
driven by a true VC CEO, who had the vision to name his company SmartContract and buy the most iconic domain name, establishing a defacto monopoly through google searches & brand recognition
pulled a fucking merger and acquisition of a partner/competitor to extend its functionalities (who does that in this space?)
blockchain agnostic, meaning potential usage on any DLT, both public and private, needed by entire crypto space
fully focused on B2B
crystal clear long-term and ready-to-be-adopted vision and endgoal, which is not only rooted in tech idealism (more trust, less middlemen) but in obvious enterprise practicality (contractual automation, massive cost savings), will attract both devs & customers
endless use cases covering all the biggest industries (financial, legal, logistics, insurance, real estate, construction, energy commodities, gov, etc.); all fintech studies/reports indicating strong enterprise interest, countless industry leaders joining consortia and pushing towards imminent adoption; competition will have no choice but to adapt and follow or lose
some of the most powerful connections in the space, backed by/associated with both new tech (ic3, Wood, Lubin) and legacy industry leaders (SWIFT, MS, IBM, JPM/Masters)
making moves towards integration at all baseline levels through fundamental partnerships, like legal frameworks, tech stacks, e-sig, data providers, etc. establishing a monopoly as an industry standard across the entire ecosystem
at the core of the digital legal framework, which itself is needed at the core of every other industry
tokenomics with immense potential (huge collateral needed for big industries, dried up supply from node staking driving price up after mainnet, rewards for passive income)
1 year headstart, no serious competition

fuck btc. fuck eth. fuck ravens and ripples and funfairs.

we don't need any of you. you're all NOTHING to us. We are LINKSTAS. WE ARE THE WINNERS. WE ARE THE NEW FUCKING CRYPTO ELITE. DEAL WITH IT. STAY MAD. STAY DUMB.

BUT ABOVE ALL:

STAY
POOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOR

what's the target...

Loook what came out of this cock suckers mouth an hour ago on social media

“not really sure why etc exists. has little intrinsic value.

the huge number of core devs, the research, the upgrades, the scalability roadmap, the dapps, the tokens, the icos, the dex's, the innovation, the wallets, the teams, the projects are all.. on eth.

whilst etc might have 5% of the value of eth, its more like 0.1% of the intrinsic value. in terms of ecosystem and use case. ie: whatever you could argue eth is worth, etc has got to be a tiny tiny fraction of it.

the pumpers who facilitated and pushed etc, wrote fake reports to convince the gullible and the maximalists there was value in it. they wrote fake graphs claiming that etc's monetary policy would have less dilution than eth's.. they wrote fake use-cases, claiming it would power the iot generation of hardware, when it has no specific capabilities in that area and is a poor fit for that use-case anyway.

at least etc is highly liquid so you can sell just as easily as you bought.