/biz/ - Business & Finance

Oh come on, that can't be real

dear sirs,

im here to infrom u that you will make it. we each are buying lambrogini in 2019. wait for february. have nic day sirs.

>>5777010

Yes.

>>5782507
That anon's an imposter

>>5782419
heh

>>5782747
I bought over 100k at 12c after ICO

>>5782906

>>5782953
Yeah and I had to change it again because the people at my company were onto me

>>5783045
My sides

>>5783205
>believing a tripfag

>>5810552

>>5873479

>Would appreciate a brief explanation on what they are trying to accomplish

To make us all rich.

>>5877506

>D-d-don't get automobiles anon-kun
>Horse-drawn carriages may not be s-sexy but they are s-smart

>>5912726

Literally this.

THIS IS NOT A DRILL!

For those who doubt me, look through the archives of my threads, I told everyone my institution and others would be buying behind closed doors in december and that LINKs price would go up as a result of these tokens being taken out of circulation. I said that it would have a delayed effect and LINKs price would go up seemingly without any obvious reason.

Now I have nothing to gain from telling you the following, I am not telling you to buy LINK, nor am I telling you it's gonna crash and to hold (because I am not some whale about to dump his bags) what I am telling you is that several private individuals are planning to buy amounts ranging from 1-10MM LINK soon, these are individuals who are big enough to have insider knowledge but not big enough to have been able to get in earlier and they're going to be dropping their Christmas bonuses on it. Some have already started, they are savvy enough to do it with limit buys, but ONE individual I know of in particular wants to get at least 2MM LINK, the sell book is too think to allow this. So what I am asking you is if in about two weeks you see some large buy walls DO NOT SELL. I am not telling you to buy any more LINK, nor am I telling you to hold if it crashes (if it starts crashing dump by all means I don't care), I just know this person is very motivated and its in everyones benefit not to sell. The reason I'm telling you guys is because you autists are pretty much the only people currently invested in LINK who don't have insider knowledge and thus are the only ones likely to sell.

As usual screencap this and see what happens in the last 2 weeks of Jan.

>>5990799

From what I've been seeing and hearing, LINK and /biz/ is the most surreal thing to ever happen. This will be on the level of Hillary talking about Pepe. What do I mean by that? Most financial firms are completely aware that 99% of blockchain tech right now is a joke, the only reason Wall Street is pumping corporations involving blockchain is too dupe boomers. The important people, the experts, all know that most of the shit coming is useless vapourware and the incessant decentralisation/tokenisation of everything is ridiculous. One of my coworkers was even laughing about Ripple the other day calling it a glorified SMS service.

The difference is ChainLINK is supposed to be the FIRST in the new wave of true utility function tokens, following Ethereum. Ethereum took the big guys by surprise, that has a real use case, but ChainLINK is an industry token from the ground up.

One of the weirdest thing was that these institutions didn't even want to do an ICO, but then they realised they had to because the whole POINT of LINK is to be a true industry built blockchain but if it doesn't have even a slight claim to decentralisation then it doesn't really meet its goal. So paradoxically these banks and insurance companies HAVE to let you guys in on their cash cow, that's why they are desperately trying NOT to market it. Because they DO NOT WANT YOU in their club. But 4chan being the turbo autists that you are, you found and bought this shit right up. Kudos.

In other words ChainLINK isn't just the most promising blockchain coming out, it's going to lead the charge and be the industry standard for blockchain tech. The days of blockchains that tweet out memes targeting millennials are coming to an end, the corporate blockchain is coming.

>>5991423

I was using blockchain in the casual sense of the word not formal, ChainLINK will run on blockchains and allow blockchains to work together whilst allowing staking etc. This is a decentralised profit network designed for corporations with close management by corporations. Do you really think the suits at SWIFT want to enrich a bunch of NEETs on 4chan? That was why the presale required you guys to pool your money together, that's why ChainLINK was only on Binance for ages. These people are trying to basically deploy ChainLINK on the ETH network (because they have to in order to call it decentralised) whilst not attracting your attention. You weren't supposed to be invited to the party. They even went with a relatively boring logo and name.

>>5997440

I TOLD EVERYONE TO PULL THEIR SELL ORDERS. DONT SELL.

>>5998353
Relax, I still fully intend to do that but I've been in New York since Christmas and personal opsec means I'm not putting my LINK in a cold wallet while I'm abroad. Once I'm back in London and have access to my Subgraph OS.

>>5998694

The point is I'm creating a new wallet and transferring my LINK into that wallet. It isn't proof unless I show you the wallet address before sending the LINK there.

>>5999103

It's a good idea but it suffers from PhD-itis. In other words the developers are too academic and will likely take way too long to complete goals due to lack of practicality and lofty ideals. I used to intern at Renaissance Technologies and they really work hard to keep their PhD grads meeting targets.

For that reason I believe Cardano will suffer the same fate as many technologies that are better on paper, while Ethereum will experience an influx of corporate and industry support which will ultimately seal it's fate as industry leader.

>>5999727

It's a 200k wallet and you'll get your proof soon enough.

>>6000011

>>6000634

Reverse image search dumbass.