/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55937071
Based. The anime girl yields graph is integral to /smg/, some lewds for 6% would be kino.

the whole bull run is front run a 18 months ahead.
right now is the part where it goes down a little, but then another big step up.
are you really stupid enough to short this graph?

It still follows the flat graph

>>55932472
wasn’t it like 520 pre market? or ah? that isn’t even on the graph kek

>>55930529
Wow you are able to do some deductive reasoning, that’s good Anon you are no doubt above average. Unfortunately you deduce incorrect, although your basis is retarded to begin with. None the less I have just the thing for someone of your IQ level. Check this fucking graph. It’s even got a line.

>>55916473
The gold price graph from today literally matches the gold price from that time, but today it's 5 times slower.

>>55923665
that article is a link to people taking significant losses on their short positions.
it has nothing to do with this graph. which shows the shorts closing. among the float being traded 20x+ over.
does this picture make you angry?

>>55919912
you do realise anyone can just look at the emission graph and see you're flat out lying?
rule one of fudding is not outright lying, it exposes that a coin is being fudded to buy low or shill alternatives (in this case that radiant shit I guess)

>>55919411
clearly has demand, whoops, sorry, I forgot the graph.
look at all that demand.
hey what did EXD say about itself?

>>55919298
>this is already working and undervalued.
oh yea, it's undervalued alright. it looks like every single day it becomes more undervalued.
every single day, is a new all time low! doesn't that sound like something worth investing in?
the data it produces is useless and the graph reflects that.
here, run EXD to give sentiments on itself. if it's positive, it tells you the sentiment is bullshit. and if it tells you it's negative, you'll understand you shouldn't buy this piece of shit.

>>55919094
you actually are retarded.
'wallstreet' is not going to use your shitcoin, they have their own departments for research.
luxury brands might care, but of course they don't give a shit about sentiment changes in 24 hour increments, that's retarded.
and the concept of auctioning the research is even more retarded. normally you'd pay a think-tank and you get something out of it. this you have to win the auction, which is so retarded. if I needed the research, I need it, and no, I'm not going to auction for it.
but all this is a bullshit conversation, that sentiment has absolutely no use when you look at worldcoin's graph.
you should be able to clearly tell that piece of shit was going to bleed. just like this [EXD] piece of shit.

>>55917036
Are you legitimately retarded? I showed you a graph of manufacturing which hovers around the same number straight through the automation of manufacturing. My point stands, automation doesn't lead to a drop off in jobs, it simply alters the dynamics of the market such that jobs stagnate even as the production skyrockets. Same thing is relevant to my first graph, the median male's income has VASTLY less buying power today than it did in 1970, and this is a result of economic conditions where his labor can be paid much less in real terms due to the force multiplier effect of automation. At this point, I genuinely don't think you're smart enough to continue the conversation so I'm going to bed, maybe if you reread my posts a couple times you may actually learn something, but then again, with the cerebral functioning you've displayed so far, I doubt it.

>>55914958
personally, i liked the "charts of unrelated things going up" marketing better, the "link logo between every node in a graph" implying that link is yet another middleman collecting taxes is a bit on the nose

holy shit look at these whale dumpies
NIGGERA FAG GRAPH proves once again to be the WORST investment in the crypto space

it really is the graph is making a double top probably going to 20k non stop lmao

>>55911597
What was your argument about the logarithmic graph again?

Ahem.. May I divert your attention to the RSI double bottom on the NVDA 10 minute graph gentlemen?

>>55907048
its just classic long strong currencies and short weak currencies.
in it i threw in a little bit of asia, a little europe and a little bit of north america.
nothing fancy really.
one of them is a chfeur, i thought one day looking at a graph, "one would have to be a retard to short this" so I do the opposite. then I found out there was an ETF for exactly this by Wisdomtree,
it lets me do as little as possible and still expect a green month.

>>55907030
>so, you just wait till expiry and go to the next contract and short it and that contract is most probably priced higher and thats it?
Yeah basically you just let the contract rollover when it expires. Even an individual contract will have a downtrend compared to spot VIX because any contract goes from being close to what I call the "VIX horizon" (VIX price expectation for the distant future) which is a fairly average price to sliding towards spot VIX at expiry which is usually lower than that VIX horizon. Rolling over to the next contract just lets you enjoy the downtrend more, and when you rollover you lock in contango gains, as in the difference between the two contracts is something that adds up as a gain, so you want to lock in the greatest possible difference.

Btw this makes it difficult to slurp VIX spikes because if VIX remains elevated for a while (and therefore be in backwardation) you might lock in losses every time you rollover.

What's your top graph strat?

>>55906937
>say you are 1x
no, with current VIX levels you should be more like <0.5x, if you put lots of money in it it should be more like 0.2x, 1x is overleveraged for shorting VIX futures long term, if I did 1x I could get margin called if VX1! hit 32.7, which is a common enough occurrence. If you can get margin called at 32.7 you are stupid and don't know how to manage your risk at all

>with svix svxy
Short VIX ETPs have shown that they can fail catastrophically when VIX spikes, although they've lowered their leverage to avoid this happening again. "Volmageddon" was an ETP problem, for VIX futures traders it was just another spike to 38. But using SVIX or SVXY is pointless, the point of shorting VIX futures is to outperform SPY, to be way green and at ATH when equities still haven't gone back up in years. SVXY didn't reach pre-covid highs until 3 years later.

>>55906950
see the graph, that's your backtest >>55906857

>>55906849
well, by shorting the vix on monday first hour of vix (published by cboe)
and closing it on friday end of market,
you get a similar return as svxy and svix.
but buying the svxy or svix you dont risk blowing up as much.
but all in all, the give a similar curve.
the flats that you see on the white line graph are because of bank holidays, I didnt take them into account.

in my opinion, buying the svxy or svix is like buying the SPY on leverage except you dont get liquidated and your returns are a little bit smoother.

If I posted an all-time brokerage graph showing that I only make money and I'm up 638% in the past three years, would it make you quit buttcoins /biz/ and come work for me?

>>55901561
bonding curves, the graph curation PTSD from 2021

>>55900525
... I'm aware. I don't know where I put it but there's a graph breaking out the % gain by market cap in SP500, and most of it was the top 10 companies. Everything else averaged a measly 10~% and the smaller half of them were negative