/biz/ - Business & Finance

The sheer tokenomics of Everest alone guarantees that one day 1 LINK = 1 ID. There are only 800,000,000 ID tokens which will be systematically burned by usage of features on the Everest platform, i.e. regulatory compliant KYCing. Not to mention every single institution in crypto and the legacy world wanting to onboard into DeFi will be forced to stake 250,000 tokens if they want full access to the features of Everest. It is not only well within the realms of possibility that 1 LINK = 1 ID given these tokenomics compared to Chainlink’s 1,000,000,000 model - it is an eventual guarantee. By the will of Kek and the All Father, this manifestation is destined to take place. Even if it takes Chainlink dumping further.

>>58192396
Is 1 LINK = ID true? Everest will be 81,000 one day?

>>57403605
as for the shills, yeah they are obviously here to contain.
they use obvious tactics like asking 'have you had sex lately / when was the last time you had sex / go touch grass / wyckoff / whales accumulating / didn't change id's etc.''

price has underperformed since its early days and i say that as somebody who is way up. these days it's just a bitcoin tracker with a bit of lag or a bit in advance but either way it might as well be bitcoin.
think it will break out of that one day but also think bitcoin is going somewhere huge and have some of that so, thankfully, am ok. will sell my btc before link though just because have developed a personal distaste for fuddies and that's my decision.

what i wanted to say op was that yeah, you're right, there are people here who try to ruin any honest conversation about link and it's price performance which is a pity because link is a great idea and a very very impressive piece of technology in a space that very much requires it and the price action is also worthy of discussion.

>>56335401
I couldn't even get around a 1 day ban. I definitely cannot ID hop. You jump at shadows apparently. 42 posted a lost of esoteric mystic type stuff. If you think anyone who say anything remotely religious or espteric is 42 you will see him everywhere. I dont think he has even posted in the past 2 years. I recall one thread with him talking about rainbows and other stuff back in 2021 maybe? That was the last I heard of him. Anyway I pretty much reply to whomever (you)s me provided I have something to say in reply. My ID switches, the rare times they do happen, are outside of my control and you can tell when it happens right away due to me outing myself. What point would there be in me trying to pretend to be a different poster? In arguing with myself? Im not shilling an obvious scam like nyan cat so why would I use their tactics? I enjoy discussing link and spirituality and religion. When link threads begin to slide toward the former I tend to join in as it pertains to my interest and its not as though we dont have a dozen other link threads at any given time that are free of that sort of discourse. Feel free to be as upset as you need and call me whatever names will make you feel better about it but realize I'm not an enemy of anyone here nor am I intentionally being hostile. I suspect you are either out of touch with reality or the delphi member who decided to stay behind and further derail judging by >>56335549

>>56126690
The sheer tokenomics of Everest alone guarantees that one day 1 LINK = 1 ID. There are only 800,000,000 ID tokens which will be systematically burned by usage of features on the Everest platform, i.e. regulatory compliant KYCing. Not to mention every single institution in crypto and the legacy world wanting to onboard into DeFi will be forced to stake 250,000 tokens if they want full access to the features of Everest. It is not only well within the realms of possibility that 1 LINK = 1 ID given these tokenomics compared to Chainlink’s 1,000,000,000 model - it is an eventual guarantee. By the will of Kek and the All Father, this manifestation is destined to take place. Even if it takes Chainlink dumping further.

fudcucks are such a weird freebie to get with my 50x appreciated link tokens
i never thought that one day id have a bunch of ESL retards trying to gargle my balls and offer free financial advice about my investments for free 24/7 when i first got these cubes but here we are i guess

>be retarded stacklet
>waste years of your life basing your personality around hating your own investment for "twitter clout" and just end up being doxxed and ridiculed for being an ugly mongoloid
>it finally moons one day
>but its openly known that you're a "crypto investor" that holds this super valuable link token
>get jumped by local thugs with pliers and end up as just another horrible news story, never actually making it
id bet like 1k link this is how it goes down lmfao

>>55302321
>At some point a mod pointed it out, after we had like 20 hours of meltdown and 10 threads that all slid down the board with no brakes, making all the crypto nerds seethe (but not the good kind…).

Thanks I saw catbox link, I know what you mean it starts with a C. I was wondering why so many /pmg/ threads got nuked that day. That thread splitter is always one post by ID too

>>54209501
Yes in fact I am making that assertion, because the sheer tokenomics of Everest alone guarantees that one day 1 LINK = 1 ID. There are only 800,000,000 ID tokens which will be systematically burned by usage of features on the Everest platform, i.e. regulatory compliant KYCing. Not to mention every single institution in crypto and the legacy world wanting to onboard into DeFi will be forced to stake 250,000 tokens if they want full access to the features of Everest. It is not only well within the realms of possibility that 1 LINK = 1 ID given these tokenomics compared to Chainlink’s 1,000,000,000 model - it is an eventual guarantee. By the will of Kek and the All Father, this manifestation is destined to take place. Even if it takes Chainlink dumping further.

>>54179177
The sheer tokenomics of Everest alone guarantees that one day 1 LINK = 1 ID. There are only 800,000,000 ID tokens which will be systematically burned by usage of features on the Everest platform, i.e. regulatory compliant KYCing. Not to mention every single institution in crypto and the legacy world wanting to onboard into DeFi will be forced to stake 250,000 tokens if they want full access to the features of Everest. It is not only well within the realms of possibility that 1 LINK = 1 ID given these tokenomics compared to Chainlink’s 1,000,000,000 model - it is an eventual guarantee. By the will of Kek and the All Father, this manifestation is destined to take place. Even if it takes Chainlink dumping further.

>>53986575
Silverbank just shut down and SEN is dead, imagine not understanding the implications of that.

>>53986689
What they don't understand are that the sheer tokenomics of Everest alone guarantees that one day 1 LINK = 1 ID. There are only 800,000,000 ID tokens which will be systematically burned by usage of features on the Everest platform, i.e. regulatory compliant KYCing. Not to mention every single institution in crypto and the legacy world wanting to onboard into DeFi will be forced to stake 250,000 tokens if they want full access to the features of Everest. It is not only well within the realms of possibility that 1 LINK = 1 ID given these tokenomics compared to Chainlink’s 1,000,000,000 model - it is an eventual guarantee. By the will of Kek and the All Father, this manifestation is destined to take place. Even if it takes Chainlink dumping further.

>>53775085
>>/biz/?task=search&ghost=yes&search_text=One+day+1+link+%3D+1+id

The sheer tokenomics of Everest alone guarantees that one day 1 LINK = 1 ID. There are only 800,000,000 ID tokens which will be systematically burned by usage of features on the Everest platform, i.e. regulatory compliant KYCing. Not to mention every single institution in crypto and the legacy world wanting to onboard into DeFi will be forced to stake 250,000 tokens if they want full access to the features of Everest. It is not only well within the realms of possibility that 1 LINK = 1 ID given these tokenomics compared to Chainlink’s 1,000,000,000 model - it is an eventual guarantee. By the will of Kek and the All Father, this manifestation is destined to take place. Even if it takes Chainlink dumping further.

The sheer tokenomics of Everest alone guarantees that one day 1 LINK = 1 ID. There are only 800,000,000 ID tokens which will be systematically burned by usage of features on the Everest platform, i.e. regulatory compliant KYCing. Not to mention every single institution in crypto and the legacy world wanting to onboard into DeFi will be forced to stake 250,000 tokens if they want full access to the features of Everest. It is not only well within the realms of possibility that 1 LINK = 1 ID given these tokenomics compared to Chainlink’s 1,000,000,000 model - it is an eventual guarantee. By the will of Kek and the All Father, this manifestation is destined to take place. Even if it takes Chainlink dumping further.

>>53356822

>randomly posts in link threads with no context, starting to be critical and fud
>doesnt know that only 5 fudders shit up the board all day every day with about 10-20 anons responding randomly, checking in once or twice a day
>gets accused of being one of the 5 mentally ill spammers
>is surprised.

Maybe you should get more context. If you want to just look at the state of anything link related. 90% of the time its one if 5 people spamming the same junk posts from pol, nobody really responds and they just id switch and spam up.
Occasionally a legit thread is made and they shit it up after they find it too.

You will be forgiven for having your view of events because you are just dropping in with no context.

There is no legitimate discussion anymore because these 5 or so mental ill losers destroyed all discussion. It’s impossible to have any legitimate discussion because of them. The collection of 5 mentally ill weirdos spending all their waking hours at it has ensures that.

>>53126649
The sheer tokenomics of Everest alone guarantees that one day 1 LINK = 1 ID. There are only 800,000,000 ID tokens which will be systematically burned by usage of features on the Everest platform, i.e. regulatory compliant KYCing. Not to mention every single institution in crypto and the legacy world wanting to onboard into DeFi will be forced to stake 250,000 tokens if they want full access to the features of Everest. It is not only well within the realms of possibility that 1 LINK = 1 ID given these tokenomics compared to Chainlink’s 1,000,000,000 model - it is an eventual guarantee. By the will of Kek and the All Father, this manifestation is destined to take place. Even if it takes Chainlink dumping further.

>>53063382
The sheer tokenomics of Everest alone guarantees that one day 1 LINK = 1 ID. There are only 800,000,000 ID tokens which will be systematically burned by usage of features on the Everest platform, i.e. regulatory compliant KYCing. Not to mention every single institution in crypto and the legacy world wanting to onboard into DeFi will be forced to stake 250,000 tokens if they want full access to the features of Everest. It is not only well within the realms of possibility that 1 LINK = 1 ID given these tokenomics compared to Chainlink’s 1,000,000,000 model - it is an eventual guarantee. By the will of Kek and the All Father, this manifestation is destined to take place. Even if it takes Chainlink dumping further.

The sheer tokenomics of Everest alone guarantees that one day 1 LINK = 1 ID. There are only 800,000,000 ID tokens which will be systematically burned by usage of features on the Everest platform, i.e. regulatory compliant KYCing. Not to mention every single institution in crypto and the legacy world wanting to onboard into DeFi will be forced to stake 250,000 tokens if they want full access to the features of Everest. It is not only well within the realms of possibility that 1 LINK = 1 ID given these tokenomics compared to Chainlink’s 1,000,000,000 model - it is an eventual guarantee. By the will of Kek and the All Father, this manifestation is destined to take place. Even if it takes Chainlink dumping further.

>>52858435
The sheer tokenomics of Everest alone guarantees that one day 1 LINK = 1 ID. There are only 800,000,000 ID tokens which will be systematically burned by usage of features on the Everest platform, i.e. regulatory compliant KYCing. Not to mention every single institution in crypto and the legacy world wanting to onboard into DeFi will be forced to stake 250,000 tokens if they want full access to the features of Everest. It is not only well within the realms of possibility that 1 LINK = 1 ID given these tokenomics compared to Chainlink’s 1,000,000,000 model - it is an eventual guarantee. By the will of Kek and the All Father, this manifestation is destined to take place. Even if it takes Chainlink dumping further.

>>52803639
>>52803815
>>52803917

Ahh, okay I see it now. I'm back, but my ID may have changed. Let's think about the actual receipt token stLINK itself for a sec. Now that staking is live, link can be staked on mainnet. The ERC20 token itself contains the value of one link that has been staked in the stakedotlink protocol. The node operators who now stake in stakedotlink are facilitating the movement of many billions of dollars worth of value and have been for years. They are very, very profitable, and they are paid in link. Holders of the stLINK token are about to learn just how profitable. 5.5% of their profits are now going to be imbued into that token, stLINK. You want staked link. Who currently has access to that liquid token? Solely SDL holders, as these are the node operators and now members of the public.

When we see this profit reflected in the first round of rewards, whenever it’s posted, it will become clear what has happened. The actual stLINK token itself, of which there are currently only 787,000 or so, will experience a liquidity event. Remember that there has been no USD value yet assigned to stLINK on any explorers or on the platform. Imagine the arbitrage effects that will take place once these profits enter the picture. It’s suddenly a really, really valuable token. You need stSDL (and by extension SDL) to own stLINK. You need LINK to own stLINK. These two tokens will increase in value accordingly. Stakers already in the community pool will be delighted as the value of their LINK rises. But they are earning rewards in LINK. As a staker in SDL, that I am earning rewards in stLINK which is liquid. I have access to this liquidity event from day 1.

>>52774597
>...Anonymous (ID: kiO3f8n4)
>12/07/22(Wed)19:11:53 No.52774597
>8 KB JPG
>>I'll finally be a millionaire now that chainlink has staking!
>>Ohhhhhh Chudbros, we are SO BACK
>...Anonymous (ID: 3f6Su0PY)
>12/07/22(Wed)19:21:22 No.52774754
>876 KB PNG
>>>52774597 (OP) #
>>I'll finally be able to FUD staker anons now that chainlink has staking!
>>Ohhhhhh FUDbros, we are SO BACK
>...Anonymous (ID: iPHABZEa)
>12/07/22(Wed)19:22:11 No.52774770
>>>52774597 (OP) #
>Hahahaha retarded jew
>You can fud the icp retards with that but most OG were already millionaireys or are still
>...Anonymous (ID: HPIZVQbC)
>12/07/22(Wed)19:22:24 No.52774773
>>>52774597 (OP) #
>>I'll finally be a millionaire now that chainlink has staking!
>this but unironically
>...Anonymous (ID: Zg9yV4ks)
>12/07/22(Wed)19:23:52 No.52774802
>111 KB PNG
>>>52774597 (OP) #
>>my $80 of Link per month will one day be worth millions!

>>52658254
The sheer tokenomics of Everest alone guarantees that one day 1 LINK = 1 ID. There are only 800,000,000 ID tokens which will be systematically burned by usage of features on the Everest platform, i.e. regulatory compliant KYCing. Not to mention every single institution in crypto and the legacy world wanting to onboard into DeFi will be forced to stake 250,000 tokens if they want full access to the features of Everest. It is not only well within the realms of possibility that 1 LINK = 1 ID given these tokenomics compared to Chainlink’s 1,000,000,000 model - it is an eventual guarantee. By the will of Kek and the All Father, this manifestation is destined to take place. Even if it takes Chainlink dumping further.

>>52629727
The sheer tokenomics of Everest alone guarantees that one day 1 LINK = 1 ID. There are only 800,000,000 ID tokens which will be systematically burned by usage of features on the Everest platform, i.e. regulatory compliant KYCing. Not to mention every single institution in crypto and the legacy world wanting to onboard into DeFi will be forced to stake 250,000 tokens if they want full access to the features of Everest. It is not only well within the realms of possibility that 1 LINK = 1 ID given these tokenomics compared to Chainlink’s 1,000,000,000 model - it is an eventual guarantee. By the will of Kek and the All Father, this manifestation is destined to take place. Even if it takes Chainlink dumping further.

The sheer tokenomics of Everest alone guarantees that one day 1 LINK = 1 ID. There are only 800,000,000 ID tokens which will be systematically burned by usage of features on the Everest platform, i.e. regulatory compliant KYCing. Not to mention every single institution in crypto and the legacy world wanting to onboard into DeFi will be forced to stake 250,000 tokens if they want full access to the features of Everest. It is not only well within the realms of possibility that 1 LINK = 1 ID given these tokenomics compared to Chainlink’s 1,000,000,000 model - it is an eventual guarantee. By the will of Kek and the All Father, this manifestation is destined to take place. Even if it takes Chainlink dumping further.