/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>11201007
Don't shoot the messenger Mr. Bond, heed my warning. No one is using these tokens, no, they will not go from $0.30 to $100

>>11201034
That's a non-factor presentation grab from 2017, they wish SWIFT was actually going to utilize this thing. Do you think LINK would be under $10 if any of these partnerships were real?

Why are there so many gullible newfags on here?

>>11201030
How heavy are those bags fren? You and your 1999 Civic Si will have to wait for another investment to strike it rich

None of you shills will get this thing past $1 so give up

>>11201166
kek, you'll be drinking that drink in a year when LINK is $0.08 and you lost your $850 life savings bucko

>>11200983
I just gone done making love to a salesforce exec, and during pillow talk he told me all about the lack of internal integration with link. BIll Gates and Tom Gosner were also there and told me that they hate stinky linkies and will never EVER use the network. You should believe me because of this picture of an expired credit card I found on the internet.

>>11201273
You're not worth the time poorfag. Your deflections are all we need to hear, you're desperately trying to attack the guy who made millions off BTC and ETH, because he thinks his useless token will reach the same levels.

If only you were on these calls. My contact at Salesforce acknowledged that he held 15k LINK but sold long ago, cat is out of the bag. Any inkling of possibility that these large forces were using LINK would result in a top 5 market cap overnight

>>11201319
top fucking kek, first it was $3 by May, $10 by July, and $1000 EOY. None of that shit has happened brainlets, you continue to get abused by scam artists toying with your minds

>muh check these dots I connected
>I posted a webpage that somehow got taken down 4 seconds later
>muh we weren't supposed to know

>$0.33

It's an elaborate scam, I am thinking of writing a tell all book about it next year. I have enough information to essentially document the entire scam. LINK is not going to be used by any corporations

>>11201389
not FUD anon, look at the facts and ask yourself why the breadcrumbs keep getting posted. someone wants you to see this, buy their bags, and hold them

>>11201449
You're probably the one posting these shitty breadcrumb threads "look anons I found this secret document outlining Microsoft using LINK!"

Mad that I'm calling you out? I have nothing to lose posting facts about a shitcoin like Chainlink, but I'm doing some good in the world telling the newfags to sell. As I did at $0.60, $0.50, and $0.40. What's the price now brainlet?

>>11201507
kek there it is

Congrats on this, seriously

>>11201552
>>11201557
>>11201561
>t. link bagholders

>>11201590
Good news doesn't make a token moon, it's FOMO and hype. That's why shitcoins like TRX and XLM created millionaires. This will create pork and beans buyers after they sell in 2019

>>11201668
total loser that called the death of LINK from $0.60 down. Bow down bitch

You all are finally getting the news... awww

>>11211323
88 of the top 100 wallets are the team's. Just fyi. And Sergey has 6-7 offshore bank accounts with your ico money.

Congrats on this

>>11211983
I'm real, I wouldn't waste my time. It doesn't feel right because it isn't. If it was even close to $1-2 you'd probably feel better. No catalysts are coming to cause a pump, most tokens dump after mainnet, and the team has millions in offshore bank accounts thanks to that ico (which made it a security btw)

0% chance link would qualify for Coinbase's new asset listings (team owns majority of tokens/wallets, and the ico was a mess)

>>11212812
next month and in November, let me guess, LINK will be under $0.30

>>11212819
Dom Perignon, anon

>>11212880
Yep. I know of several anons on here who bought in at $1.20 and are desperate to get this shit back to break even, they don't believe $1000 EOY for a second but will swear to you it's happening

More of you are beginning to wake up

Gooooood, gooood, it will be over soon

>>11212950
>t. $1.23 bagholder

>>11213032
Yep, these guys are nowhere close to the professionalism and talent of the ETH devs, and of course the BTC core devs

I wouldn't put a penny into LINK, well, maybe when it falls to a penny just to piss on the non believers one last time

You'd be the biggest moron on this board to invest your money in Chainlink. Stop falling for the stupid memes and smarten up. What do you think the LINK buyers at $0.80 are doing right now? Trying to sell you their bags

>4th revolution
>Literally never going to pass $1 again

Stop posting this. Bad pasta. LINK is a shit token but still, stop this.

>>11234464
Go fetch me the paper pleb