[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/3/ - 3DCG

Search:


View post   

>> No.596139 [View]

>>596133
>GPU rendering is the future
Well I can imagine that using multiple GPUs will probably be more powerfull than using dual CPUs
But if that the case GPUs price may skyrocket like ram prices did this year, something that may should keep in mind.
>>596135
>Ignore Renderman and Vray for now, get Redshift and Arnold and learn these. Both are easier to learn.
Redshift looks very good, but should I really learn both?
I mean Redshift and Arnold.

>> No.596126 [View]
File: 231 KB, 800x508, 1510752697248.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
596126

I hope the thread doesn't die on me.

>> No.596123 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 170 KB, 404x416, 1510774200049.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
596123

Also check'em

>> No.596117 [View]
File: 438 KB, 1000x1414, 1510314478593.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
596117

Hello I'm asking your opinions on which renderer is better, before I spend hours studying it:
>Vray, Arnold, or Renderman

>Arnold is CPU-based
>V-Ray is CPU-based
>V-Ray RT uses CPU that can be used alongside the GPUs.
>Renderman rendering uses CPU+GPU

Should then renderman and V-Ray RT the best options?
I know some may say that my pc isn't that powerfull I have an i7 6700, a gtx 1070 and 16gb of ram is what I have and will have for some time.
Which rendering software would be the best for my machine?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]