/3/ - 3DCG

>>496849
Shiet, meant to start a thread, not post a comment

Why do people feel the need to defend their $4000 programs that do just as much as blender or the free houdini?

>>495899
I just want GPU rendering on smoke...

>>496342
Im not too good for it, telling people what they could and how to, improve what could be better is constructive criticism, what you did was essentially tell me it was shit, with no tips on how to improve

>>496347
Ahem https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRsGyueVLvQ

>>496341
How do i turn them up? I would love to make them higher if that would improve quality, and next time i will be sure to use a real life reference, to make it better.

>>496334
Look, this is my first try, and this wasn't exactly my idea of constructive criticism, it's criticism, but it's no where near constructive

>>496323
Well... thanks for that "constructive* criticism. And no, it's supposed to be a mid explosion, and it's my first attempt, i don't suppose that changes your opinion though.

Op here. No comments on the image i posted on the other board and want some constructive criticism. So I'll post it here

>>496300
Its on >>495318

Still working on a .avi of this

OP here, I am rendering an explosion in cycles now, will post on an already existing WIP thread when done. Also, what are your opinions on sheep it?

What does /3/ think of Blender? Im very much a beginner at this, and mostly just want to work with physics, and object creations, and would like to move to Houdini Or Maya (probably Houdini) when i get better.