[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

2022-06-09: Search is working again.
2022-05-12: Ghost posting is now globally disabled. 2022: Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/3/ - 3DCG

View post   
View page     

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 604 KB, 2000x3600, おケツ編集.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
904750 No.904750 [Reply] [Original]

Is this good topology? I thought n-gons were a huge no-no?

>> No.904754

those aren't n-gons

>> No.904757

1. Those aren't n-gons, it's subdivided.
2. n-gons don't exist. quads don't exist. bad topology depends on the use case for the geometry in question.

>> No.904790

>n-gons don't exist. quads don't exist.
Anon is right. Everything exists as triangles under the hood. Quads and Ngons are for the convenience of the user. They're a way to organize a model in the same way functions and classes are a way to organize a program.

>> No.904795

>Is this good topology

Depends on what you want to do. It won't maintain shape under subdivision around corners as is.

Delete posts
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.