Photorealism Study

[Anonymous No.798428]

Engine: Cycles
Elapsed Time: 25m
80k Tris
Models created by me.

[Anonymous No.798429]

>>798428

[Anonymous No.798430]

>>798428
Fail.

[Anonymous No.798431]

>>798430
Better than what you can do, https://twitter.com/SlyVR5/status/1355304914927448072/photo/2

[Anonymous No.798434]

>>798428
>>798429

[Anonymous No.798435]

>>798434
>>798428
>>798429
https://old.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/k22e41/advice_for_a_n00b/

[Anonymous No.798436]

>>798428
>>798429
>>798431

[Anonymous No.798437]

Too dark, can't see any detail. That's a shame if the models are good. Improve your lighting.

Also, ignore Twitter sycophants.

[Anonymous No.798451]

Needs lighting/lookdev touchup. Can't see anything.

[Photorealism Study No.798455]

Engine: Cycles
Elapsed Time: 9h
9000k Tris
Models created by me.

Feedback please.

[Anonymous No.798464]

>>798455
Too bright.

[Anonymous No.798466]

>>798428
25 minutes for 80k tris? Are you rendering with a computer from 2005 or what?

[Anonymous No.798467]

>>798466
RTX 2080 Super ;)

[Anonymous No.798476]

>>798428
utter garbage
noisy, shit lighting, weird materials, bad composition, not photo-realistic at all
also nobody cares about render time and tris for rendering work
pro tip: abandon blender and study photography on the side

[Photorealism Study No.798477]

>>798464
thankyou for the feedbackl but it is beter than anything you could ever do in your life also please follow me on twitter thank you

[Anonymous No.798492]

>>798428
cycles is so fucking dark, like do interior lights don't exist in cycles or what, i have a friend that is a blenderfag and all his shit is terribly dark

[Anonymous No.798502]

>>798492
No, he's just a noob who doesn't know how to light his scenes properly.

[good blender lighting question(...) No.798517]

>>798502
>>798502

yo serious question. I turned off world lighting and was doing the chair against and infinite background shit. holy shit I legit needed at least 2 5000 watt lights or 1 10,000 watt pin light to make fucking anything visible. is that really how its done?

[Anonymous No.798520]

>>798428
you should really just copy some real rooms first, or at least measure stuff. the images just look very empty and the proportions are way off. the window is huge, starts at an odd height, and you can't even see where the ceiling begins. what's the mesh-thing in the window, does someone actually have something like that? and the lighting is odd, as everyone else has already said.
it kinda looks like some turbo-autist rich streamer's mansion, where he has a huge space and weird modern architecture, but didn't know what to do with all of it and took pictures that only display a boring corner with his PC instead of the interesting parts of the building.

[Anonymous No.798521]

>>798517
If you need lights this powerful than I would assume you didn't model at real size.
A 100W lamp is only as bright as a 100W lamp if the scale of the scene matches real life.

[Anonymous No.798527]

Did you make all those models? If so you rendered your lighting so shit that you can hardly see your well modeled props. Your brain on blender

[Anonymous No.798529]

>>798517
Use correct scale and change the exposure. EXPOSURE! Change it and see what happens.

[Anonymous No.798553]

>>798428
>>798429
Engine: Source
Elapsed Time: 16 milliseconds
340 Tris
Models created with BSP

[Anonymous No.798566]

>>798517
>I turned off world lighting
that's not a thing that exists, wtf is world lighting hahahahha

[Anonymous No.798568]

>>798428
>Photorealism Study
>not photorealistic
>not a study
hummm...

[Anonymous No.798572]

>>798568
Show me what you worked on anon, I doubt you can do better than me ;)

[Anonymous No.798573]

>>798572
Peak Dunning-Kruger.

[Anonymous No.798585]

>>798566
HDRI or a sky system.

[Anonymous No.798587]

>>798585
those are two very different things

[Anonymous No.798588]

>>798572
i will NEVER show my stuff on this forsaken board, but yes I can do far better, i oversee AAA rendering work for a living... let's leave it at that.

>inb4 you go deeper in denial and say it's not true. you need to understand two things: the criticisms that every anon shared here are valid, and even if they can't do better than you, your stuff is still critically flawed. it barely qualifies as an image.

[Photorealism Study No.798597]

>>798566
ah sorry yaa I dunno whatever this thing is!

>>798529
>>798521
nice thank you!!

[Anonymous No.798599]

>>798597
>ah sorry yaa I dunno whatever this thing is!
It's called an environment shader.

[Anonymous No.798608]

>>798587
How? Both affect global lighting.

[Anonymous No.798612]

>>798428
I recognise those scales...

[Anonymous No.798614]

>>798428
>photo realism study
>everything is spotless
>no desk chair
>no curtains
>floor is completely immaculate
>no floor mouldings or paneling
>window is just magically held in place
>no window frame or anything holding it there
>wall material just cuts off right at the edge corners
If photorealism were an ocean this is a droplet of water on the sidewalk.

Show us the pc, let's see how much you goofed up that too.

[Anonymous No.798615]

>>798597
>>798599
wow blender is so absolutely fucked up when it comes to lighting and rendering........

[Anonymous No.798617]

>>798614
>window is just magically held in place
LMAO

and also don't forget the shit ass fake DOF, with the exterior uniformly blurry and the interior uniformly sharp (none of it happening based on actual depth)

much photographic, very study

[Anonymous No.798646]

>>798615
Bullshit, Maya and Max do the same thing, just under different names.

[Anonymous No.798650]

>>798646
*laughs in gamma 1.0 rgb filmic preset*

[Anonymous No.798654]

>>798650
You can use aces in blender

[Anonymous No.798656]

>>798646
>Maya and Max
have Arnold

[Anonymous No.798663]

>>798656
Thanks for a valuable info, anon

[Anonymous No.798798]

>>798431
Your whole twitter timeline is so cringey jesus, big ego with no talent

[Anonymous No.798810]

>buy expensive PC full of rgb and overkill cooling
>hide it under a desk

[Anonymous No.798819]

>>798810
>spend days modeling and assembling your scene
>hide it in shadows
Yep, there's a pattern.

[Anonymous No.798825]

>>798819
kek

[Anonymous No.799203]

>>798517
This is someone who lacks any form of 3d fundamentals ladies and gentlemen. This is what happens when you learn everything from youtube turorials. Simple shapes with no real complex geometry. Noisy, dark renders - yet he thinks it is hot shit. Lmao. Clearly he pays zero attention to model size and units and just models like a retard. Honestly, I would hate to see a UV map done by you of anything that is even slightly complex.

[Anonymous No.799215]

Legit question OP, have you ever seen a window in your life? Do you live in a mud hut in an african village? How do you manage to post on 4chan?

[Anonymous No.799879]

>>799215
>>799203
>>798798
>>798617
>>798588
>>798568
>>798553
>>798527
>>798476
All of you are all talk and nothing to show for it. I posted my work here and clearly I've made a lot of you jealous to some degree since you're all trying to degrade my work.

[Anonymous No.799888]

>>799879
ok, enjoy your delusions then

[Anonymous No.799895]

>>799879
Please, post more of your work.

[Anonymous No.799899]

>>799888
>>799895
https://gyazo.com/3a174ca834272ec61cd236bd65165fc0

My homage VR world for Porter Robinson.

[Anonymous No.799906]

>>798428
Why does every beginner make their interior scenes so fucking dark.

[Anonymous No.800608]

>>798612
What scales? You can hardly see anything in this it's so dark!

[Anonymous No.800611]

>>800608
Look again at the "window".

[Anonymous No.800620]

>>800611
What are they from??

[Anonymous No.800933]

>>798428
in what shape or form is this photorealism