[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/3/ - 3DCG

File: 77 KB, 1280x720, 1584968253216.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

791538

Anonymous Wed Dec 30 20:32:12 2020 No.791538 [Reply] [Original]

has the cloth brush in zbrush made MD obsolete? Rn I have head busts that need bodies with clothing

>>	Anonymous Wed Dec 30 21:38:22 2020 No.791543 Not by a long shot.

>>	Anonymous Wed Dec 30 22:04:21 2020 No.791544 Basically, yeah.

>>	Anonymous Wed Dec 30 22:22:32 2020 No.791547 >>791538 do it by hand faggot

>>	Anonymous Wed Dec 30 22:37:07 2020 No.791550 MD implicitly admitted being obsolete by going with the subscription model.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 31 02:16:37 2020 No.791568 >>791538 It's not possible for the simple fact that it's movement that create many tension folds and creases. You need animation for a simulation to work.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 31 04:53:38 2020 No.791588 >>791568 I'll simulate my dick inside your asshole faggot

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 31 07:17:40 2020 No.791613 >>791588 I'd accept the offer if you're hung, but something tells me you're a blender user with a micropenis

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 31 08:20:29 2020 No.791622 >>791568 so you're saying cloth brushes make it so you dont have to animate and give you similar results without the effort.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 31 13:51:39 2020 No.791674 >>791538 No and here's why no sculpting program ever will. Marvelous takes into account the measurement you use for the fabric. No pattern can ever stretch beyond it's size. Sculpting programs will never create believable folds like this.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 2 17:46:12 2021 No.792117 >>791674 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YI4Hc_HDBAo&list=WL&index=72 cope

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 2 17:53:14 2021 No.792118 >>792117 Is that supposed to be a counterexample?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 3 10:14:25 2021 No.792250 File: 76 KB, 460x550, 1487628837748.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>791538 >all clothing will now look ridiculously oversized and poorly tailored instead of having realistic folds

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 3 10:30:47 2021 No.792253 >>792250 The trousers in OP look particularly silly. Not just oversized, but oversized and wet. Plus unrealistic, they look like a wire fence pattern. The longer I look at it, the more annoyed I get. Fuck artists.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 3 10:45:05 2021 No.792257 >>792253 I CANT UNSEE IT YOU FUCKING DICKHEAD

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 3 13:14:47 2021 No.792291 >>792253 Once you apply color that effect goes. Have you never seen a scan of clothing, shit looks terrible without color.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 3 14:23:29 2021 No.792307 >>791538 more rumples = more betterer I see

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 3 14:35:08 2021 No.792310 the pants look so alien and wet kek but did actually a good job on the jacket maybe to much around the arms