[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/3/ - 3DCG

View post   
File: 342 KB, 1920x1229, alexi-vangorn-2019-001-lucy-full-alt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
694765 No.694765 [Reply] [Original]

>blender is shi-

Yeah, I'm thinking he's back.

>> No.694778

>>694765
You could post an image of an award winning model from an iconic series by an internationally renowned studio made by the best artists to ever live but if it was made in blender /3/ would call it shit.

>> No.694786

>>694765
99% of the work was done in zbrush..

>> No.694788

>>694786
>https://www.artstation.com/artwork/oOPKNJ
>Sculpture, Retopology, Texturing (also gimp), Rigging made in blender 2.78. blender 2.80 for rendering only (EEvEE).

>> No.694793

>>694765
god eevee looks so good but has such awful shadows

>> No.694794

Sculpt in zbrush
Retopo in topogun
Uv in rizom
Make clothing in marvelous
Texture in mari
Rig and render in houdini
Composite in nuke

>> No.694795

>>694793
>but has such awful shadows
That's mostly because people just either take the output as is or at most additionally activate contact shadows and call it a day.
You can get some pretty good results if you fiddle around with the settings and use the damn LIGHT PROBES.

But overall it is still meant as preview and too many brainlets think it is there to replace cycles which is absolutely not the fucking case.

>> No.694796

>>694794
who are you listing

>> No.694798

>>694765
Now show me some posing/animation which hasn't horrible deforms

>> No.694799

>>694796
The workflow of a professional.

>> No.694804

>>694793
I'd love to see realtime raytracing in eevee.

>> No.694812

>>694765

Is blender like a furry credibility thing. Just because you render it in blender you get some free plaudits. Nobody would give a fuck if you said rendered in zbrush.

>> No.694828

>>694788
Why would anyone go to the internet and tell lies... How could that ever happen?

>> No.694830

>>694828
You think the artist is lying?
What would be the point?

>> No.694832

>>694830
Blendlet conspiracy.

>> No.694834

>>694799
based

>> No.694886

>>694794
and how much is all of this shit gonna cost?

>> No.694888

Guys I tested blender 2.8 beta and its nothing like blender 2.79.
I barely know anything and yet was able to bend a cube and give it a texture.
Its a world of difference.

>> No.694889

>>694886

https://www.cgpeers.com/

It's free bro.

>> No.694897

>>694889
but bro, that's a tracker, i only ddl.

>> No.694905

>>694897
Son, I am disappoint.

>> No.695021
File: 49 KB, 421x323, i love not thinking.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
695021

>>694786
Even if that was true, the same goes for the other 3d programs so what's your point?

>> No.695022

>>694794
give me ONE (1) good reason to use mari over painter

>> No.695024

>>695022
24k texture support

>> No.695027

>>695024
And it needs 64gb ram right?

>> No.695028

>>695022
Better performance

>> No.695030

>>694778
fpbp

>> No.695038

>>695022
UDIM you can paint across, bieng able to deform stencils/projections, node editor, Photoshop .abr support. Better brush engine. Open subdivision support. Animation support. Camera matching. The reasons just go on forever. Substance painter is good software but it still has a long way to go to match parity with Mari. Even though on paper Substance looks so far behind I still use it for a lot of things.

>> No.695042

>>694765
Shit that's really impressive. How do they manage to get the model so poly-perfect?
Is it sculpted or made from a mesh? I'm an amateur in blender/design pls no bullie.

>> No.695046

>>695038
>He doesn't know

>> No.695058

>>695046
>t. Mrs. Nothing-To-Say-But-Must-Pretend

>> No.695070

>>695022

For using a photo and pretending you textured it like this guy did it's the best. FFD's on photo reference are a great way to make a photo conform to your mesh. I find it's better for painting displacement maps too. Substance tends to pad the pixels around low and high points so you end up with less detail overall.

>> No.695089

>>695042
Shit ton of sub division and smoothing.

>> No.695094

>>694765
The fuck is that outfit. What is the occasion

>> No.695095

>>695094
The outfit is a cow outfit, which leads me to believe that the occasion would be milking, obviously.

>> No.695102

>>695095
But that doesn't make any sense, you have to remove the outfit before you can milk.

>> No.695109

>>695095
Shit pants, wedgie city

Shit purse, would fall of immediately

Shit weapon, 1-2 damage max

>> No.695112

>>695102
You could just lift up the top though. It doesn't look like it'd be all that hard.

>> No.695117

>>695102
>implying the cow hide wouldn't still be on the arms
>implying the bikini top wouldn't be dangling down, lightly touching her breasts, as she's on all fours being milked by anons
I hope that enlightened you.

>> No.695130

Tbh really inspiring. Great job. Very jelly. How can I learn. Real question. Red pill me

>> No.695132
File: 47 KB, 469x708, NotAGoodAnime.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
695132

Lucy from FairyTale.

Shit anime, shit character... But the 3d model is well made.

>> No.695133
File: 23 KB, 285x655, CheckCount.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
695133

>>695042
>>695089
Actually if you look on the thigh you can see the poly count.

And if you establish good materials and good lighting you can achieve a great amount making it look very polished.

>> No.695140

>>695132

So it looks nothing like the character then. What did he make it thic for.

>> No.695144

>>695140
>nothing like the character
now you are just being autistic standarlet
clothes the same
hair similar style made mroe realistic
anime face turned realistic
shes not that much thiccer desu, and he might ave used manga lucy who is thiccer

>> No.695145
File: 32 KB, 640x640, 12256625_179163235764642_1209768836_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
695145

>>695140
he forgot whip

>> No.695159

>>694765
what do people find appealing about generic charactesrs like those, cant you do it in daz in like 5 minutes

>> No.695160

>>695159
the character, yeh, but that could be said about literally any human male or female model

>> No.695171

>>695130
install blender

>> No.695172

>>695159
Nobody cares about slide-pushers. Making a character, on the other hand, requires skill, and it's worthy of appreciation when well done.

>> No.695196

>>695144
>clothes the same
>hair similar style made mroe realistic
I guess he forgot that all weebs have to distinguish one character from another are these traits.

No, it looks nothing like the character. That's ok, but don't go all autismo on people when they point it out.

>> No.695231

>>694765
>tiny axe
Is this a diablo cow level reference?

>> No.695235
File: 67 KB, 640x480, Diablo_Cow.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
695235

>>695231
>diablo cow
>of what the fuck is he talking about
>google
HOLY SHIT,i thought i had played everything in this game

>> No.695249

>>694765
these vomit inducing shoes tho...

>> No.695254
File: 47 KB, 800x448, aa-Cover-vltktphoulcqt6blednphmhie0-20170331121228.Medi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
695254

Tell me your rates.

>> No.695256

>>694794
>using all this bloatware when you can just do all this with blender
lmao brainlet

>> No.695263

>>694786

cope

>> No.695264

>>694765
model be damned, how do you get materials like this in blender? how do you generate nice realistic skin?

>> No.695309
File: 109 KB, 1380x846, Untitled.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
695309

yeah, i'm thinking he's not.

>> No.695311

>>695309
that addon isn't even made by them

>> No.695313

>>695311
it's also the only reason to use blender.

>> No.696147

>>694832
Now that is coping

>> No.696164

>>695133
>Actually if you look on the thigh you can see the poly count.
This.

You can literally count the fucking polys thanks to the amazing shading job and THE POWER OF BLENDER.

Fucking beat your meat already and you'll finally realise you were just not getting enough blood to your brain to see this for the mediocre fapbait that it is.

>> No.696165

>>696164
You know this was in Eevee right, a real-time renderer?
Show my a game today that you can't see some polygons on if you get the light at the right angle

>> No.696170

>>696165
We're reaching levels of cope that shouldn't even be possible.

>> No.696179

>>696164
>>696165
the normal map is fucked up, it has absolutely nothing to do with blender or that it's a "real-time renderer".

>> No.696182

>critizing a low poly model for having visible polygons.
ok /3

>> No.696188

>>696182
>sculpted mesh
>low poly

Lol

>> No.696200

>>696182
Smooth shading was invented 48 years ago

>> No.696251

>>696200
Think that might be caused by a screenspace ambient occlusion filter. Seen the very same thing happen inside GTA V while diving underwater during certain light conditions.

Looks like some Z-depth based functions that doesen't compensate for the implied curvature and makes the facets of a models real visible.

>> No.696252

>>696251
>functions, models

Is there a troll filter applied to the posts here or do I really type like that?

>> No.696291

>>695231
in the anime it's a key that summons a minotaur, thus its an axe looking key

>> No.697708

>>694765
>No visible pubes
You can do better than that

>> No.697738

>>694765
Nice work. How many polys?

>> No.697739
File: 46 KB, 312x312, puke.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
697739

>>696251
>SSAO
modern video games were a mistake