[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

2017/01/28: An issue regarding the front page of /jp/ has been fixed. Also, thanks to all who contacted us about sponsorship.

/3/ - 3DCG

View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 87 KB, 1280x720, SGI.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
685394 No.685394 [Reply] [Original]


This looks damn realistic. Even better than some CGI done today.

>> No.685397

Star Wars was miniature models and matte painting and fireworks, no cgi at all. The first Star Wars movie with some cgi was Empire Strikes back.

>> No.685398

What made it look so good was the Dykstraflex camera system.

>> No.685401

because are miniatures, not CGI, dumb nigger.

>> No.685405


Didn't the Lucas remakes use cgi.

>> No.685408

George lucas hire team A space odyssey.

>> No.685421

Hurr durr

>> No.685422

this was made recently by this Youtuber you retard.Read the comments.

They also used to make cartoon graphics back then that were supposed to look like CGI though, eg for TRON

>> No.685429



here you go fucking retard.

>> No.685434

How young are you jesus fucking christ

>> No.685435
File: 303 KB, 1420x832, vegasquared.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Why are sgi machines so aesthetic? I miss the concept of bespoke hardware and the closest we will get these days is fpgas and shit like this

>> No.685506

there is a fucking reason for the only 'real' cgi in this movie being wireframe/vector graphics because there was absolutely nothing in 79 that could have made filled let alone textured polygon graphics within reasonable time

>> No.686115

A hilarious amount of it, people always make fun of the special editions for that very reason.

Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.