Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

2017/01/28: An issue regarding the front page of /jp/ has been fixed. Also, thanks to all who contacted us about sponsorship.

/3/ - 3DCG


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 377 KB, 1920x1080, Screenshot (4).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
661436 No.661436 [Reply] [Original]

What is the best/easiest method for fixing geometry after a Boolean function?

>> No.661438
File: 464 KB, 1920x1080, Screenshot (5).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
661438

>>661436
better photo

>> No.661440

>>661436
just sculpt it bro

>> No.661443

>>661436
There's nothing in that topology worth saving anyway, you need to retopo from scratch so just forget about it for now

>> No.661444

>>661443
wow! thank you anon, any more great tips?

>> No.661445

>>661443
why? too many quad just for a simple head?

>> No.661447

>>661445
will lower the sub-surf once i finish modelling, it just helps highlight problems with my topology

>> No.661448

>>661447
>>661445
noob here but i think he mean the mesh flow
you couldnt rig that shit with that flow

>> No.661449

>>661448
the horns are meant to be static, aside from the Boolean cut, what's wrong with the flow?

>> No.661450

>>661447
Why do you even model in such high poly in the first place? Wouldve been much easier while in low poly to to select the faces for the eyes, extrude them in and then just smooth and subdiv and the round shape should come by itself with aittle tweaking. Instead, you chose to bang your head and divide ngons to fix bad geometry.

>> No.661452

>>661450
good point. . . i'm new to this

>> No.661453

>>661436
meshmachine has some tools to deal with booleans.

>> No.661478
File: 1.37 MB, 366x556, boolean workflow.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
661478

>>661436
collapse the vertices so its easier to read and removing floating verts. honestly you can stop there and just have a subdiv modifier to see how it smoothes, since it will convert your triangles to quads. the other is to apply loop reduction methods since the sphere looks higher in loop count. next time tho, work on lower poly models with a subdiv on, dont fucking collapse it. if youre going to use booleans you need to work with something more easier to see, you still will have a lot of artifacts, but the subdiv will take care of that, so its okay to have triangles, and if you have n gons just triangulate them.

>> No.661488
File: 26 KB, 607x569, modster.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
661488

OP, use autosmoothing and set an angle at around 30 degrees. The model will look fine after.
You can even animate the object you used to do the eye booleans to make eye deforms. Thats what I do to make my characters.

>> No.661562

Hey, instead of making eye sockets with a boolean, try selecting only the middle face of the eye and move it inside with proportional editing enabled and set to spherical fall-off.

>> No.661647

>>661436
You seriously need to learn to box model with subdivisions.

>> No.661649

>>661478
That's a pretty sadistic way of modeling.

>> No.661660

>>661649
for blendlets yeah

>> No.661661

>>661649
there was a whole thread about it and thought it was pretty bullshit

now that i see in action i think it's a neat concept for a worfkflow, but i'll still never forgive the ungodly amount of ngons and triangles he leaves around

>> No.661665

>>661661
>ungodly amount of ngons and triangles he leaves around
its just triangles and quads.

>> No.661689

>>661660
For anyone downstream who needs to UV, texture, rig, blendshape etc

>> No.661691

>>661689
i hope you're not as retarded as i think you are.

>> No.661702
File: 2.55 MB, 500x281, 25BBD4EAA2FE4BD19DEE8D7BAA7C7BA0.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
661702

>>661691
You think everyone is Retarded
The truth is You is Retard one

>> No.662102
File: 193 KB, 1290x1188, 1543939761390.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
662102

>>661665
in the gif yeah, but if it's the same guy i'm talking about he usually leaves that and much more like pic related
people constantly said he shades and rigs his own models, and while that might be true and the work he presents seems to be fine i struggle to believe it to be ideal in any way, shape or form, although it might be nice to establish shape and such and is a workflow that i think might deserve to be explored, the end result is far from a nice topology usually, and that's just his fault

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
reCAPTCHA
Action