r8?

[Anonymous No.568993]

r8?

Entirely made in Cinema 4D

[Anonymous No.569010]

As with most of the things made by people of your generation, it's boring, uninspired and depressing.

[Anonymous No.569011]

>>569010
> 'your generation' meme

[Anonymous No.569027]

>>569010
Well, sorta the mental state i was in at that time so make sense.

This better?

[Anonymous No.569028]

Ill just dump some pictures i've made

[Anonymous No.569029]

>>569027
Shadow under the roof is too sharp.
>>569028
Needs gamma correction.

But the subject is better.

[Anonymous No.569035]

>>569029
I agree with both, thanks!

Not happy with this render, but it takes forever to render.

[Anonymous No.569036]

>>569035

[Anonymous No.569037]

>>569036

[AAAnd WIP continues No.569038]

>>568993
wow man this looks awesome!!!
kinda has retro feel to it, like from early 2000's agressive sci-fi shooters )) Unreal Tournament to be speciffic

[Anonymous No.569039]

>>569038
Thanks man!

This is before i textured most of it.

[Anonymous No.569040]

>>569035
Look at the histogram of your pictures after you've rendered them. Also, for exteriors you should get an HDR sky texture and set it up to double as a light source.

[Anonymous No.569044]

>>569040

Ill definitely look into that, thanks!

[Anonymous No.569050]

The shading on the metal is completely wrong. Does C4D have PBR shaders?

[Anonymous No.569051]

>>569050
Not sure mate, I'm just an amateur

[Anonymous No.569052]

>>569051
Also I'm pretty impressed by my lightning in this render, is it decent or?

[Anonymous No.569053]

>>569039
I'm not the same anon but I'm a newbie when it comes to Cinema 4D and I just got it. Is there any tips you can give? This is seriously amazing to me.

[Anonymous No.569054]

>>569053
Just try making something large, something where small mistakes are hard to find with an amateurs eyes.

I first tried to make small things thinking it was easier. It really is not.

This is one of my first "real" renders. I was SO proud of it.

If you need help you can add me on skype - Topstabilitet

[Anonymous No.569057]

>>569010

>says the guy who is technically in the same generation but prefers to see himself one year before or after it

[Anonymous No.569058]

>>569051
>Not sure mate, I'm just an amateur
Basically metal should have 0% diffuse, it should be controlled by specular amount and roughness. PBR shaders should have specular and reflection linked together if not they need to match.

[Anonymous No.569060]

>>569050
>>569058
I'm here to judge you for crimes against Computer Graphics. Please don't infect OP with your metallic AIDS.

[Anonymous No.569062]

>>569060
Small Chuckle, thanks.

>>569058>
What about the lightning in this one? >569051

[Anonymous No.569063]

>>569039
this actually looks better than the textured version. those textures were godawful

[Anonymous No.569089]

>>568993
Do yourself a favor and ditch C4d's internal render for a better one. Doesn't matter which one, V-ray, Arnold, Redshift, Corona are all better than the internal.

[Anonymous No.569110]

>>569010
You are the worst kind of shitposter. Kys.

[Anonymous No.569112]

>>569060
I like this a lot, reminds me of a level in a 90s/early 2000s FPS.

[Anonymous No.569114]

>>568993
grerat design, but the metal materials looks... definitely not metal. it looks like relly old renders, before PBR were a thing.

If you are not already using physical renderer, switch to it.
Study PBR in cinema, you can create most of the material in the reflectance channel (if you are using R16 or newer - if not then upgrade to newer version). Go physical way - every material is either metal (GGX channel in reflectance) or non-metal (collor channel, diffuse models in reflectance...), there is nothing in between. rust/color are nonmetal layers on top of metal.

upgrade your materials and then it wil look 200% better

[Anonymous No.569129]

>>569114
Don't tell him to use that shit renderer when he could use something actually decent. Physical Render is even worse than cycles while being 10 times slower.

[Anonymous No.569136]

>>569112
I'm pretty sure it's duke nukem

[Anonymous No.569137]

>>569114
>>569063
I will definitely work on my texturing, Thanks!
>>569089
Im just a poor student and from what i've seen they're pretty expensive yes?

> Think i rendered this in the physical, but not sure.

[Anonymous No.569150]

>>569011

k unemployed beta millennial. Show us your

>meme make weed great again
>works is hard
>niggers fucking your fat millennial hick boyfriend you call a "femboi"

Why you even here? You don't create or do anything useless.

Stupid shit poster.

[Anonymous No.569154]

>>569137
I use Corona for C4D and it's free in alpha right now, but still very capable. It's absolutely brilliant for photoreal interior scenes.

[Anonymous No.569160]

>>569154
My copy of C4D might not be legit, still possible to get?

[Anonymous No.569164]

>>569160
If you don't have a legit copy of C4d, why do you care if those other renderers are expensive, C4d is expensive too, and yet you have it...why not have the other renderer too?
the answer to your question is yes btw.