/3/ - 3DCG

[Anonymous No.517547]

Hey /3/

Just finished this Judy rig I've been working on over at /co/, and I though I may as well post it here. It is for >Blender, and can be acquired here: mediafire.com/download/5u5h59bmmifuxcx
It is also up on blendswap if you prefer.
There are some things I'll be fixing soon, but I'll wait for feedback to make other changes as needed and then update it.

Anyways, hopefully you guys have some fun with it.

[Anonymous No.517548]

>>517547

Can you do Elsa too ?

[Anonymous No.517550]

>>517548
Well, I don't know, but I'd image there must be a half decent rig already by now...
I couldn't in the short term at least because I've got a backlog of homework from trying to get this done.

[Anonymous No.517551]

>>517550

Theres only one available, But...

Its low poly models from a mobile game...

[Anonymous No.517554]

>>517550
There's one user on TurboSquid with a bunch of amazing Frozen recreations, but they all cost over $200 USD.

[Anonymous No.517555]

>>517554

Not $200

It was $600

[Anonymous No.517557]

>>517555
Hence why I said OVER $200 dollars. The cheapest I saw was $300 but I only checked out the Frozen content.

[Anonymous No.517558]

>>517547
That's crazy, so well done. How long did this take you?

[Anonymous No.517559]

>>517557

Also is not worth 600 dollars though since the model is kinda uncanny

[Anonymous No.517564]

>>517558
Glad you like it! I've been working on it for just under two weeks.

>>517559
Yeah, it looks really weird. From what I can tell that is because the eyes are pointing too far apart from eachother. Otherwise it is workable.

[Anonymous No.517565]

Sorry, massive noob to Blender here. How can I reset the pose to be the same as it looks when I select the Armature in the Outliner?

[Anonymous No.517566]

>>517565
To reset the pose select all the bones in pose mode and hit alt-g, alt-r, alt-s

[Anonymous No.517567]

Nice, looks like the official model

[Anonymous No.517569]

>>517566
I tried that, and it doesn't work.
It only changes the pose a little bit.

I noticed however that even when pressing A in the viewport to select all, only some bones were selected. So I sat there and selected them all by hand, pressed Alt-G+R+S, and it still didn't work.

[Anonymous No.517570]

>>517547

Can you upload an fbx. Thanks.

[Anonymous No.517573]

>>517569
That looks quite bizarre, I don't quite know what went wrong there unfortunately without being able to see more. To be honest this is a fairly complex rig, so it will be hard to work with if you don't have much blender experience.

"a" will toggle selection of all the bones in pose mode by the way.

What I think is going on is that you need to change the IK/FK properties and the pivot property. In the readme I explain where those properties are located when the rig script has executed. Make sure it has run by opening the script and pressing alt-p over it.

>>517570
mediafire.com/download/uj4di687b8oey69
Do note that a lot of work is required to get the fbx working, as a lot of not exportable features are used in the blender rig.

[Anonymous No.517575]

teach me your ways

[Anonymous No.517576]

>>517575
Lots of image layering.

[Anonymous No.517577]

>>517576
I'm still real new to the 3D stuff, this just seems amazing to me.

[Anonymous No.517578]

>>517577
Not OP, by the way. Just seems like that's how it was made seeing how movie accurate it is.

Kinda wish an IK-less version was packed with the OP's .blend, it's a pain disabling all the constraints just to see what's connected to what.

[Anonymous No.517579]

>>517578
Im still tryin to texture my first character and now I'm playin action figure.

[Anonymous No.517580]

>>517578
You can change if it uses IK or FK by using the slider underlined after selecting any arm/leg bones. That Rig tab might not show up until you run the judy_rig_ui.py script from Blender's text editor.

[Anonymous No.517581]

>>517580
Oh shit anon, thanks.

Just one of the perks of using rigify or whatever, I guess.

[Anonymous No.517586]

Too bad there's not a way to save Cycles hair settings as a mesh. (That I know of.)

[Anonymous No.517599]

this stuff's pretty fun.

[Anonymous No.517600]

>>517599
blender fur looks awesome

[Anonymous No.517601]

>>517600
apparently so. that'll be a fun thing to learn.

[Anonymous No.517602]

>>517564
> under two weeks
did you really had to lie about it ?...

[Anonymous No.517603]

>>517602
>did you really had

Not everybody is as clearly retarded as you anon.
2 weekss to make this is very reasonable. There is very little detail on the model so if you know what your'e doing the actual workload isn't going to consume a lot of time.

[Anonymous No.517607]

>>517599
how do you control the face, I can't find the face controls

[Anonymous No.517608]

>>517607
Check if there is a camera named something to do with facial controls.

[Anonymous No.517609]

>>517607
See >>517580
The face and mouth layers are hidden by default, so you need to show them using the panel in the picture. If it doesn't exist, make sure the script is run.

[Rafael Matthews No.517612]

>>517603
> guise I made the same thing a pixar team made in over a month in less than 2 weeks xDD
This is cringeworthy...

[Inez Waters No.517613]

>>517601
not much to learn, really, you get a virtual brush that you can use to brush it in 3D, you get to control length, shape, kinks/twirls/etc, amount etc, and you can put any shader on it you like

it's pretty intuitive, I would say, the first time I tried it out (without a tutorial) I pretty much immediately got photorealistic results (just make sure to put a partially translucent, partially anisotropic shader on there -- translucency and anisotropy are the two defining features of the "hair look")

[Shane Skinner No.517614]

rolling for epic name

[Morgan Bush No.517615]

>>517614
epicccc

[Darryl Price No.517616]

>>517614
>Skinner
That is great

[Georgia Barker No.517618]

>>517614
The fuck is actuallu habben here and why do i got vivian rose on my last post ?
Wait... vivian... vivian... vivian.. i think that sound familiar..

[Timothy Douglas No.517619]

>>517612
it's by disney studio, not pixar. And while this model is really nice, it's clearly not nearly as detailed or finely rigged as the original one. Also, the disney team made many characters, not just one. This one also just has the default blender fur applied to it, probably just based on a default human rig, etc. You can bet everything is custom on the original disney one.

I have no big issues believing he made this one in two weeks.

[Lorene Dyer No.517620]

>>517612
A skilled person could make this over the weekend if they poured every ounce of their time into it. OP probably worked on and off over those two weeks, and you can still tell that he had to be dedicated as fuck to get the level of accuracy he did.

[Jeffrey Carpenter No.517623]

Would take me months to make this as I am so autistic. Can you bake fur to a texture in blender?

[Gale Thornton No.517626]

>>517612
Actually the body is pretty basic and generic, he might have just took it from somewhere. The face is just as simple as well. And if he just slapped a readymade rig this can easily be done under 2 weeks.

[Shari Mcguire No.517631]

So..SFM port anyone..? :)
Perhaps a nude bunny version? Yeah?

[Paul Stone No.517635]

>>517631

No. Fuck you.

Get the Fuck out. Rabbit Fucker.

[Matt Cooke No.517640]

>>517635
Why the fuck not?
Give me 2 legit reasons that don't include learning, as to why anyone would want to use this model, or any copyrighted character for that matter.

[Pat Ryan No.517641]

>>517640

1. You are an Furfags.
2. People who make Furry Porn should die.

Simple

[Robbie Ponce No.517642]

>>517631
I'll port it for SFM soon. Rabbit porn here we go.

>>517641
It's inevitable. It actually surprised me that nobody attempted pr0n from this rig so far. Enjoy r34 :]

[Perry Hebert No.517644]

>>517642
Excellent my good friend.
Excellent.

[Dustin Galvan No.517646]

>>517547
>>517642
>>517644

Oh god, No.

This is Your fault, OP.

This is Your fault

[Jaime Andrews No.517647]

>>517547

Couldn't you have used this as a portfolio piece. Now you will be associated with whatever these lunatics come up with.

[Fernando Harris No.517649]

>>517647
Who says he can't use it as a portfolio piece?
One of the artists from Steven Universe drew porn of their characters. Cartoon Network didn't care.

Stop being such a fucking sour grape.

[Santos Branch No.517650]

>>517647
I wouldn't be the one making the porn, so that is a non issue for use in my portfolio.

[Meghan Lowe No.517651]

>>517650
post your folio

[Delbert Heath No.517652]

>>517548
You again. Fuck off with your fap fantasies.

[Michelle Crane No.517653]

>>517652

You too. Fuck off with your furry fap fantasies.

[Wilfred Hester No.517655]

>>517653
I haven't even seen the movie.

[Forrest Li No.517656]

>>517655

But you want to fap to this model.

Furfag.

[Erin Riley No.517657]

>>517649
>>517650
Thats not his point. Now anyone can also show this as a part of my portfolio and say that they made this model.

[Gustavo Sims No.517659]

>>517657
>and say that they made this model
That's incredibly fucking retarded logic.

First off, no decent 3D artist is going to claim works that aren't theirs, especially when applying for a job.

Second, since only a shitty artist would claim works that aren't theirs, it would be blatantly fucking obvious that the work doesn't belong to them.

You're basically saying people shouldn't release source files since others can misuse/claim its theirs.

[Olivia Holmes No.517660]

>>517656
Nice perspective projection matrix you got there.

[Juana Strickland No.517663]

>>517659
I'll just take this bunny model he gave and release it under another name that I made up just to make a point. I'll even pose it like a pornstar^, add a rigged furry dick and port it to SFM people so they can turn his work into just another furporn character that amateur animators can abuse all they want.

[Jaime Dean No.517685]

You can always claim other peoples art as being yours. woop-de-do.

[Lindsay Walter No.517686]

>>517612
didn't check but just from the pics i've seen it seems far, far beyond AAA studios standards.
Not undermining OP's work though, it looks nice and it's great of him to share it, but yeah

[Justin Meyer No.517687]

Alioto should make a Judy model.

[Chris Holmes No.517689]

>>517686
mouth, tongue, individual facial muscles, fingers, toes etc are all rigged

it's pretty far up there

[Brandi Terrell No.517690]

>>517689
> i did this in less than 2 weeks guise trust me xDD
kek

[Belinda Dorsey No.517692]

>>517689
I'm a complete blender noob, I've ran the script and see the options but moving the handles around does nothing? How can I control these?

[Homer Glenn No.517693]

>>517692
first off, on startup it asks you whether you want to run scripts or not, say yes, it will reload the file.

then go into pose mode, this allows you to move bones around by rotating (r) and grabbing (g).

when in pose mode, you should now on the left side get a panel with extra controls (below the grease pencil) with options to switch between IK/FK, rig head, face, mouth, arms, legs, toes, etc separately

also note the many different layers below in the layer-switcher. Bones are on layer #2 (but just keep all layers visible at all times)

[Joanna Chambers No.517694]

>>517693
I have the rig panel, but moving these does nothing to the mouth/lips.

I'm probably missing something obvious lol.

[Maxine Levine No.517695]

>>517694
nvm the script didnt run properly, Reloading it fixed it.

[Dwayne Todd No.517696]

>>517694
are you grabbing them with g while in rig mode?

[Andre David No.517698]

>>517696
Also make sure you reloaded trusted, otherwise the controls don't work.

< example

[Sammy Barker No.517699]

>>517689
>mouth, tongue, individual facial muscles, fingers, toes etc are all rigged
i certainly would hope so, these are pretty much the minimum requirement for a character rig.
Again, I don't want to be a cunt since it's great that OP shared his work (and everyone commenting on it looks pleased with it), but seeing the screenshots here i don't believe for a second this compares to a feature film rig. But hey, no biggie, i was merely responding to the dude who thinks it's impossible to rig a charcter in 2 weeks

[Evelyn Herring No.517700]

>>517699

I interpreted the "AAA" as meaning an AAA game production. I would say this is easily up-to-par in terms of quality with many AAA game rigs I've seen. I've not worked in film, so I don't really know what the rigs look like there. I can imagine that some of them are much more complex still and have many more features.

[Brett Madden No.517701]

>>517641
Making furry porn is a good way to make a good amount of money.

[Karla Mitchell No.517702]

>>517701

TFW you are thinking about doing it because you need the money but you would rather do ass to ass.

[Timothy Sandoval No.517704]

>>517698
thats what it was.

All is working now.

[Austin Webb No.517707]

>>517702
There is a fairly good couple sayings to go with this.

''Do what you like and the money will come.''

''If you are great at anything someone will pay you for it.''

With furries you don't really even have to be great to get paid.

[Tiffany Snyder No.517709]

>>517707
>implying SFM consumers are better
>implying any cartoon porn consumers are better
I hope you're not serious.

[Amber Berg No.517711]

>>517709
Not really implying anything. Someone was being pissy about furries. I am merely saying that it's a good option for commission money.

[Aurora Howell No.517713]

I'm going to try and convert it for Luxrender. Thanks for the new training exercise, OP.

[Dianna Stark No.517715]

>>517704
neato.

>>517707
I never understood why furries in particular are so derided on the internet. Guess I don't really give enough of a shit to find out either.

>>517713
Do you even need to do much conversion for that? If you just load it up in blender with the luxrender plugin, shouldn't you be able to basically just press the render button?

[Timothy Chavez No.517716]

>>517715


Because Furries = Animals

[Franklin Brock No.517717]

>>517716
So? Some people are into kids, poop, cannibalism, ... seems rather harmless in the big picture.

[Dwight Thompson No.517718]

>>517717

>So?

You're the part of Autism, anon. Along the people who into kids, poop, cannibalism, etc.

[Sherri Schmitt No.517723]

>>517547

Uh Oh anon.

You stole it, didnt you ?

Its ok if you stole it.

its 4chan anyway.

http://www.cgrecord.net/2016/04/download-zootopias-judy-hopps-rigged-3d.html

[Victoria Huerta No.517724]

>>517718
kek. oh well. I guess my levels of giving-a-shit are just below the rest of the internet populace.

[Marcia Sutton No.517727]

>>517715
>Do you even need to do much conversion for that? If you just load it up in blender with the luxrender plugin, shouldn't you be able to basically just press the render button?

No. Lux and Cycles have completely different node options. And I believe that goes with every other renderer too. I think the Luxrender team are trying to make an option that will completely convert a Cycles material into a Lux material. It works well with simple materials. Although from doing a little work in it already it Luxrender makes material setups a lot easier. With that cloth material I don't have to mess with all those cloth bump maps.

[Otis Barber No.517728]

>>517723
The model is unmodified and the credits to the author (matching the author from that page you linked) are in there unchanged. License is also unchanged.

OP might or might not be the original creator, but he is re-distributing the model legally as per the license and with the original credits.

[Jenifer Yang No.517730]

>>517723
No, check the threads on /co/ in the archive. I posted multiple wips there that you won't find elsewhere.

>>517689
To be honest I must agree with those saying this isn't all that close to a real production rig. I would need to add a lot more controls and flexibility to get there. I could to that if I put more time into it, and I might improve upon it soon, but in its current state anyways the rig itself is not terribly impressive.

[Jonathon Woods No.517734]

>>517718
Tone down the absolutism shit, son, will you?

[Anne Velazquez No.517738]

>>517718
>Complaining about autism on 4chan

[Eloise Garza No.517750]

Make a naked one please.

To put clothes on her of course.

[Debbie Escobar No.517752]

>>517657
If you try and say you did it but couldn't make it you'll be fired immediately anyway.

[Jimmy Hahn No.517756]

Finished. Jody Hopps, Luxrender edition. Still a bit noisy. This was literally my first time posing anything so pls no bully. Thanks OP for providing this model.

Also fun fact: The belt is made out of leather.

[Fannie Wolf No.517757]

>>517715
They used to be very annoying in the early days of the internet but that's all gone now and pretty much only 4chan cares anymore.

[Laurence Maldonado No.517758]

>>517715
Remember how bronies were in the beginning? That's why. But possibly worse.

[Brian Brooks No.517765]

>>517757
>>517758
Except people have given animals human bodies basically since we learned to read and write. It's nothing new.

[Warren Arroyo No.517766]

>>517765
We're talking about on the internet.

[Herbert Wallace No.517779]

Is there a way to "delete" an IK setup, and just keep the regular bones?

I'm not an advanced user in the slightest, 3DCG is just a passtime for me, and I have no desire to learn how to work with IK. (Unless it's actually really simple.)

[Anonymous No.517785]

>>517547
This is absolutely one of those days I'm so happy I logged into 4chan instead of listening to my conscience.

Thank you for this

[Anonymous No.517786]

>>517547
this shits fuckin weird

I hate blender so much, WHY cant it be normal at all.

[Anonymous No.517787]

>>517766
>>517765
We're talking about people who take it to the extreme, anthropomorphising is nothing new.

[Anonymous No.517788]

>>517547
>>517599
>>517704
>>517715
>>517756

These are absolutely amazing, guys! Very well done. Showed some of these to some non-channers and they were summarily impressed as well. Inspires me to look into this myself.

[Anonymous No.517792]

>>517779
um... you can just disable IK and use FK instead, but we use IK because it's way easier than FK.

IK is like "put your hand here" and then all the other bones follow suit and do whatever is necessary to move the hand there

FK is like "put this angle in the elbow, put this angle in the shoulder, put this angle in the wrist, ..."

[Anonymous No.517794]

>>517792
Both have their merits, in my experience. FK allows for more explicit control without having to fuck with the pole target, for example. IK is usually best for endpoints you don't want to move, like planted feet or hands.

[Anonymous No.517795]

>>517647
I don't think it would look good on you to remake something someone else made.

[Anonymous No.517800]

I couldn't figure out how to do face movements right away so I scrapped that bit for later. I'll get around to it next time. Took 22 god damned minutes to render on my corpse of a computer.

[Anonymous No.517801]

>>517800
more lewd poses

for the people asking for SFM ports, I'm pretty sure you're going to need to make a decent fur texture first.

[Anonymous No.517802]

posting costanza

[Anonymous No.517803]

>>517717
It is because people who are into kids, poop, cannibalism, doesn't go into the streets talking about how they like kids, poop, cannibalism.

Also, they don't usually have events where they gather and wear suits that looks like kids, poop, or cannibalism.

[Anonymous No.517808]

>>517803
The problem here is that, aside from poop, being into those two other things is illegal, but being a furry isn't.

[Anonymous No.517810]

>>517547
>blender
You wasted all that time, half of it was probably spent fighting the interface anyway.

[Anonymous No.517811]

>>517810
Shitpost harder m8

[Anonymous No.517812]

>>517810
I know this is bait, but I'll reply anyways
There some number of people are going to try and port it for Maya, chances are it is just a matter of time. I've used Maya a little, but since I used blender first and have been doing so for 6 years, I hardly consciously think about the interface anymore, and I work fastest in it. Use what you know. Besides, I enjoy scripting in Blender much more, as the application and api is brilliantly designed around that. Modifying the interface is super easy if you can handle baby tier python, which I'd know because I hardly know much python myself, and you don't even need the source code to change most of it.

[Anonymous No.517813]

>>517812
do you have steam ?

[Anonymous No.517814]

>>517813
I'm assuming you mean stream? Yeah, I do. But I'd make a new account for this.
In the off change you mean steam account, yeah.

[Anonymous No.517816]

>>517814
Steam as in Gaben account

[Anonymous No.517817]

>>517547
I'm not a rig or animation guy, so my pose sucks, but great job OP!

[Anonymous No.517818]

>>517816
I am usually not logged in, but my account is plonuu

>>517817
Looks great! These renders that people are turning out are great!

[Anonymous No.517819]

>>517818
why u no use steem :'c

[Anonymous No.517820]

>>517547
>>517756

No "alternate" version?

[Anonymous No.517821]

>>517819
literally not enough memory. While making this for example, I crashed my computer at least 20 times. I have 8GB, but since this is a >laptop, 2GB is shared with the video card, so it is more like 6ish effectively. Things like stream tend to be quite heavy when added up.

>>517820
Nope. I doubt it will be very long before something is made however...

[Anonymous No.517822]

>>517802
Fuck I was going to do that when I get home. With a baseball bat and everything.

[Anonymous No.517823]

Hey op how did you get so much hair with a low particle count?

[Anonymous No.517824]

>>517823
There are about 8000 main hairs on the head alone, with 65 child particles for each of those. The child particles are the final hairs you see, while the 8000 hairs define where the generated child particles should point. There is a panel for child particle setting in the particle menu. In total, that gives about 520,000 hairs.

[Anonymous No.517835]

This is amazingly done OP. Is there any chance you could do a Nick rig too?

[Anonymous No.517837]

[Anonymous No.517850]

>>517837
noice

[Anonymous No.517851]

>>517850
Is there any other way I can contact you ?

[Anonymous No.517852]

>>517851
I'm not OP, but try his steam account
>>517818
>plonuu

[Anonymous No.517853]

[Anonymous No.517854]

>>517852
got it thx :)

[Anonymous No.517856]

>>517756
After letting it render while at work, this is the cleaner result.

Please rate.

[Anonymous No.517857]

>>517856
Doesn't look as good as the cycle ones, IMO. Fur color etc is also a bit off, but whatever.

Do you have SSS on the ears? The ears look way better in cycles, IMO.

The lux fur on the face also looks really weird, IMO. On the ears it's nice, but on the face it just looks really sparse and sporadic.

Nose and mouth also look like they are missing SSS

fur on the feet also looks a bit weird, not as rabbit-like as the cycles one.

[Anonymous No.517859]

>>517857
>Doesn't look as good as the cycle ones, IMO. Fur color etc is also a bit off, but whatever.
Cycles has a more dedicated hair shader and also has more tuning options. Whereas For Lux I had to just mix a glossy and transparent shader together. The color might be because OP might have tweaked the color values a bit on the texture. I didn't.

>Do you have SSS on the ears? The ears look way better in cycles, IMO.
No. SSS in Luxrender is a bit more complicated. In Cycles there is a dedicated SSS shader but in Lux you have to use volumes and mess with scattering scales, scattering colors, absorptions and absorption values.

>The lux fur on the face also looks really weird, IMO. On the ears it's nice, but on the face it just looks really sparse and sporadic.
Not sure what you mean by this.

>Nose and mouth also look like they are missing SSS
See reason for SSS above.

>fur on the feet also looks a bit weird, not as rabbit-like as the cycles one.
Maybe I still need to mess with the material some more.

[Anonymous No.517860]

>>517859

If you look at e.g.
>>517853
or
>>517817
, the hair on the face looks pretty fluffy, loose and regular. In the luxrender one it looks more like it's only a couple white hairs on a really gray skin. Especially if you look at the bottom of the head, where it almost looks like there's no hair at all except for some sporadic white hairs that are sticking out.

Makes it look kinda ugly, IMO. The cycles one has a more luxurious, even, soft look to it, I think.

Except for the top of the ears, where the lux one looks really fluffy.

[Anonymous No.517861]

>>517860
I see what you mean. And it could be my material, or it could be the angle it is at and the light brightness. Maybe there would be more detail if I cranked up the lights a bit. I'm trying to fix my material right now.

[Anonymous No.517864]

>>517788
>non-channers
get out faggot

[Anonymous No.517866]

What makes better looking hair, solids or triangle ribbons?

[Anonymous No.517867]

>>517866
blenderguru.com/tutorials/how-to-render-hair-with-cycles/
This has a good breakdown of the hair settings.

[Anonymous No.517871]

I may not be a furry, but damn is this bunny cute.

[Anonymous No.517872]

>>517871
You are now

[Anonymous No.517878]

>>517871
;)

[Anonymous No.517879]

>>517860
I figured out what was wrong with the hair. With Lux's new auto conversion feature it also make a light grey hemi lamp causing to be lit from every angle. Now with that gone I'll see how it looks in a while.

[Anonymous No.517880]

>>517871
;))))

(pubic bones a little fucked up because the vertex weight in the original model was a bit fucked, and I didn't bother fixing it...)

[Anonymous No.517882]

>>517880
>(pubic bones a little fucked up
No, that's a bulge.

[Anonymous No.517883]

>>517882
yeah.... oh well.

[Anonymous No.517887]

>>517883
'tis a fine line to walk. Pubic bones so hot tho.

[Anonymous No.517888]

>>517887
>'tis

[Anonymous No.517891]

>>517547
after playing around with it for a bit (I'm not an experienced animator or anything), some feedback:

- I think the mouth could be a bit more flexible
- tail should be rigged IMO
- pouches could be rigged
- extra drivers would be nice so that you could just e.g. close eyes with a slider or use a single slider to make ears flop backwards/down etc.

[Anonymous No.517897]

>>517792
Well thanks for actually telling me how to do that, because the script doesn't appear to be doing anything when I highlight FK and unhighlight IK.

[Anonymous No.517898]

I played around with it a little, it's a really nice rig setup, probably the best I've used out of all the ones I've messed around with that are available on Blendswap.

I did notice though that the head fur can easily clip through the chest piece. Had to comb it for this image for example. Sucks that Blender is still so shitty with particle hair systems that it doesn't have any means of temporary hair edits for animating, as far as I know. Probably wouldn't be easy working with this for animations.

[Anonymous No.517904]

>>517898
There's probably a solution for that, since e.g. cosmos laundromat and other blender-made videos feature a huge amount of fur.

I don't know how to do it, but I bet you can keyframe the hair settings/combing/length.

[Anonymous No.517910]

Is there a way for this rig to work with maya?

[Anonymous No.517911]

>>517910
You could try exporting to collada, no idea if it'll work. collada does at least support bones and such, but you'll probably end up having to do the materials, hairs etc, at least.

[Anonymous No.517915]

>>517872
post the webm

[Anonymous No.517917]

Can someone tell me where the camera is/how to operate it? When I render, all I get is a teeny-tiny judy in the middle of a 1080x1920 view

[Anonymous No.517920]

>>517915
I gotchu senpai

[Anonymous No.517921]

>>517547
Wow! That was made with blender? Wow that's amazing

[Anonymous No.517923]

This would work a lot better if someone made a Nick model. Sadly I just don't know how to do that.

[Anonymous No.517924]

>>517917
Can someone tell me how to change the fov on this rig? It renders judy too small..

[Anonymous No.517925]

>>517924
fov is unrelated to rig, it is set by your camera. I don't think the .blend comes with a camera by default, just add your own.

[Anonymous No.517926]

>>517924
At the top click "reload trusted". I don't know why it does this.

[Anonymous No.517927]

>>517925
it does come with a camera, it's just hidden on layer 9.

>>517926
well that fixed it, thank you so much!

[Anonymous No.517930]

>>517927
One problem though. If you want to save your work you have to use 'save as' instead of just normal saving and just save over the original file.

[Anonymous No.517931]

>>517926
The reload trusted is required because of the scripts and drivers. You can enable a auto run python scripts option in the settings to avoid it in the future.

Finished a little animation.
Sound version here: puu sh/o46PC.webm

[Anonymous No.517932]

>>517898

Basically the correct/endorsed way to achieve stuff not clipping through eachother is to enable physics, which will take care of it.

If you really do want to manually control it though, enable AnimAll and then you can weight-paint things such as Density, Length, Clump, Kink and Roughness separately for each keyframe (see my shitty 5-minute render)

[Anonymous No.517933]

>>517931
>puu sh/o46PC.webm
noice

[Anonymous No.517941]

>>517547
Any chance you'll make her Meter Maid outfit since it's so similar to the police outfit? All you'd have to add is the vest and hat.

[Anonymous No.517946]

>>517931
Speed it up faster and it'd be awesome.

[Anonymous No.517947]

Took me like three hours to make this little thing

[Anonymous No.517952]

test

[Anonymous No.517955]

Is there a version for Max/Maya?

[Anonymous No.517958]

>>517547
Thank you for putting this on Mediafire. I wanted to get it, but really hate the paywall of blendswap that doesn't benefit the artist... I'd love to make a donation to you for the effort you put into this.

[Anonymous No.517984]

>>517958
>paywall
Wat? It's a free website. You only need to pay if you want unlimited downloads. They don't pay artists anything because it's just a hosting site, not a store.

[Anonymous No.517987]

>>517947
>That bunny's got a gun
dunno if it was just me but felt like the fingers needed one extra level of articulation. Couldn't make a fist.

[Anonymous No.517989]

>>517931
woah that's crazy
did you do everything by yourself?

[Anonymous No.517991]

>>517800
>>517931
Holy crap, these are great!

[Anony Moose No.517992]

>>517955
Convert it yourself. Blender can spit out a .fbx file but good luck not breaking everything b/c the model uses a complex rig, cycles shaders, and hair particles.

[Anonymous No.518003]

>>517992
I can get all the textures if you want.

[Anonymous No.518006]

Where is the bunny porn.

[Anonymous No.518008]

>>518006
This is a Christian Mongolian clay sculpting board.

[Anonymous No.518009]

>>518008
every board is porn board

[Anonymous No.518017]

>>518009
Unless you like getting b& all the time, then sure every board is a porn board.

[Anonymous No.518025]

Finished this, but I'm rendering a 48 fps version now.
Sound version here: puu sh/o4IdO.webm

[Anonymous No.518030]

>>518025
it looks like shit and everyone here thinks you're wasting your time. Its literally disturbing to look at.

[Anonymous No.518032]

>>518030
/3/ at its finest

[Anonymous No.518038]

>>518032
accept reality dude, this is horrible, the same level or even worse as helen parr

[Anonymous No.518039]

>>518025

the face needs more articulation / natural motion, just pop into edit mode, select all dem bones and hit the randomize tool a couple times

image related, it's so ez to create dynamic and awesome poses

[Anonymous No.518041]

>>518032
It actually surprised me. I was expecting half these posts to be shitposts, but people actually appreciate stuff now. I'm glad that /3/ changed for the good.

[Anonymous No.518044]

>>518041
literally nobody appreciates stolen model + furry

[Anonymous No.518045]

Time to add Judy to my filter. Bye Furfags.

[Anonymous No.518046]

I'll be honest, the only reason I'm sticking around is for a nude version to pop up.
Once that happens I can die a happy man.

Tried it myself but it looked terrible.

[Anonymous No.518047]

>>518044
According to the dozens of people in the thread, everybody does.

>>518045
kthxbye

[Anonymous No.518048]

>>518047
>According to the dozens of people in the thread, everybody does.
youre delusional, its the same people over and over, this is the first time for me checking this board in a week

[Anonymous No.518050]

>>518048
> same people over and over
> 53 posters
kek

[Anonymous No.518054]

>>518050
>grasping at straws
75% of these posters are just carryovers from /co/

[Anonymous No.518056]

oy vey the hatful retard has entered the thread.

[Anonymous No.518057]

>>518054
> grasping at straws
> its just samefagging
> no no they are real people from another board
there there my butttmad friend. Maybe one day you will learn to appreciate talent :^)

[Anonymous No.518058]

>>518057
I appreciate talent already, what I see ITT is stolen models. furfags, bad attitudes, and shit

[Anonymous No.518059]

>>518058
> stolen models
stolen from where exactly ?
> furfags
you don't like animals ?
> bad attitudes
the guy gave it away for free. thats more than expected niceness you'll get around 4chan
> shit
yeah, the shit will go away as soon as you stop posting

[Anonymous No.518062]

>>518058
OP here, just curious as to why you think the model might be stolen? As I mentioned, there are wips posted on co in the archive, and in case of and doubt, see pic related. I have just short of 100 version saves of the project all the way through making the model.

[Anonymous No.518063]

>>518062
the model is from a movie thats still in theaters, Zootopia. It doesnt matter if its a recreation or not. Its stolen. Its not original. Its furry. This is the worst type of shit. Gb2 wahtever furry board you were on previously pls, this is not the place

[Anonymous No.518064]

>>518062
Can you zip them all and upload them somewhere pls

[Anonymous No.518065]

>>518025
not bad, but could use some more determination and flow between movements (looks a little robotic as is).

not sure if it helps, but i'd look into traditional animation techniques (e.g. squash/stretch and exaggeration) since disney seem to incorporate those quite successfully in their 3d animation as well.

[Anonymous No.518067]

>>518064
Right, why would spoilers be enabled on /3/? Stupid me.

[Anonymous No.518070]

>>518056
there must always be one in every thread, it's practically a rule at this point

[Anonymous No.518071]

>>518063
Why are you here in this thread!

[Anonymous No.518072]

>>518071
so this type of thread never happens again.

[Anonymous No.518073]

>>518063
Ahh, I see. I'll agree that original work is more interesting, and I typically enjoy it more. This project was mainly to learn more about getting hair/fur to work, as I haven't done any projects with that before. I copied the model because that is one of the best ways to learn, study from the masters.

That aside, >you'll care or believe me, I'm no furry. Just enjoyed the movie, and as above this was a learning project. Now, I'll preempt the obvious response, that I'm being a furry enabler by simply saying that's not my problem.

>>518064
4.1GB is more that I can upload reasonable. Besides, there is little point.

>>518065
Yeah, I'm backlogged with a bunch of homework, but after I'll work some more on it. I mostly need to exaggerate a lot of the motion, add more movement to the face, and "sharpen" the motions. I didn't have time to do that before rendering however. I'll look into how squashing/stretching looks too, thanks for the tip.

[Anonymous No.518074]

>>518073
>Besides, there is little point.

>I copied the model because that is one of the best ways to learn, study from the masters.

Literally the same post, friend.

[Anonymous No.518077]

>>518073
>This project was mainly to learn more about getting hair/fur to work,
If you want to learn how this works you have to read and understand the source code and papers behind it. You have a shallow understanding now at best, and you're results arent good, barely above Nvidia HairFX level. You wasted a lot of time and you have a bad attitude, like you know everything. This is one of the reasons why you get hate

[Anonymous No.518078]

>>518077
HAHAHAHAHAHA oh wow this guy


I've been on the internet for a good 20 years now, but this must be in the top 10 of the most retarded things I've ever read

[Anonymous No.518082]

>>518077
> you have to read and understand the source code and papers

Reading source is not how you become a good artist. Reading source does almost never further your understanding of how to apply something artistically.

Secondly, there isn't much to how fur works. I have read the source of particlesystems before, written some myself. At the basic level, it is just "take a tube/cone/fan and extrude it along this [bspline/bezier-curve/other subdivision curve]. No point in reading papers about something so simple.

Now, modern renderers are a bit more advanced than that, they let you do things such as have forces act on the particles (to get clumping, twisting, kinking, ...) and can do physics with them. But there's nothing fundamentally interesting/new, it's all basic geometry, numerical interpolation.

> shallow understanding now at best

He certainly has a better understanding now from an artistical perspective than you will likely ever have.

> you're results arent good

The only thing here that isn't good is your grammar. That aside (and that everyone in this thread -- and elsewhere -- agrees that cycles fur rendering looks great), feel free to show us something you made that's better! j/k, of course you can't, because you've never done anything of worth whatsoever.

> Nvidia HairFX level

Ah, I see you've never seen nvidia hairfx. Granted, in recent years game-hair has become acceptable, but it's still worlds away from OPs. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKpPiXRnPkg look at this or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Md4Hmgtl8q0 this. This doesn't look nearly as good as what the OP got, even though the camera stays a mile away from the hair at all times to avoid showing you the ugly.

> you have a bad attitude

only one here with a bad attitude is you; OP is a pretty humble guy. He even posted his rig for us to play around with and critique, and it's the most quality post /3/ has seen in months.

> why you get hate

you are the only one in this thread hating

[Anonymous No.518083]

>All these people this gluteus grumpy over one model

[Anonymous No.518100]

>>518072
>the hero /3/ deserves

[Anonymous No.518105]

>>518082

[Anonymous No.518107]

Will you do Nick eventually, OP?

[Anonymous No.518142]

>>517878
>>517880
I've been messing around with this model for a while now and can't figure out how to render it with the armor and belt hidden. Every time I hit F12, it renders the stuff I've hidden...

[Anonymous No.518143]

That one insecure closet furfag shitting up the thread with >MUH STOLEN

[Anonymous No.518144]

>>518143
see >>518105

[Anonymous No.518145]

>>518142
Did you uncheck *both* the eye icon and the camera icon? Unchecking the eye will only remove it from your viewport, but unchecking the camera removes it from your render, too.

[Anonymous No.518146]

>>518145
Thank you. I knew it had to be something stupid simple I was overlooking.

[Anonymous No.518153]

>>518025
LOL! That was awesome. :^)

[Anonymous No.518174]

>>518153
LOL

[Anonymous No.518181]

>>518144
Your moronic self never once adhered to even one of those points. Therefore neither me nor anybody else is required to since this started as a shitpost fest. Thanks for playing, better luck next time, loser.

Polite sage.

[Anonymous No.518192]

>>518063
le ebin post bru, many euphoric up boats :^)

[Anonymous No.518196]

>>518181

[Anonymous No.518200]

IT'S TIME.

[Anonymous No.518205]

>>518200
> no vagina
> no tits
> no ass
> nothing sexual
im okay with this.

[Anonymous No.518209]

>>518200
>da filename

[Anonymous No.518213]

>>518209
Yeah, there's a signature too.

Don't ever expect this to not happen when releasing a model of something from a popular cartoon.

P.S. Don't be surprised when whomever first ports it to Garry's mod is accredited for it's creation forever more.

[Anonymous No.518214]

>>518200
I hate you guys so fucking much.

[Anonymous No.518215]

>>518213
>accredited
*credited

Fuck me.

[Anonymous No.518216]

>>518200
>>518213
that sig better be OP's

[Anonymous No.518218]

>>518200
>>518213
Wait a second, the dA has some wip pics, and that would make the "naked" pic a wip too.
Thread OP, that you?

[Anonymous No.518219]

>>518200
aaaand someone stole OPs work. Told you this would happen.

[Anonymous No.518221]

>>518219
Calm down, the account's probably OP's.

[Anonymous No.518223]

>>518221
I doubt that's OP, Xanaeth is a different person, and I don't think Xanaeth uses Blender.

If OP would like to clarify please do.

[Anonymous No.518224]

>>518223
Why are there wips from March then?

[Anonymous No.518229]

>>518205
It'd be really easy to add those on though.
A 10 minute job.

[Anonymous No.518232]

>>518229

this
>>518200
was a 10-minute job (hide armor, change pants color to skin/fur material), adding those bits would be more work, especially if you want it to look great.

The topology of the model in the groin-area is a bit screwed-up, so some re-meshing might be necessary there.

[Anonymous No.518234]

>>517701
Whore by proxy

[Anonymous No.518235]

>>518234
you have something against sexworkers or something?

[Anonymous No.518243]

>>518200
This is most definitely not my model. Not only are there copies of this image that existed before I even stared making my version according to reverse image search, it doesn't look all that similar.

[Anonymous No.518257]

>>518219
>someone stole OPs work
Isn't OP's work considered open source since he uploaded everything that has to do with it?

[Anonymous No.518258]

>>518257
Depends on the licence.

[Anonymous No.518259]

>>518257
>lololol I can claim I'm skilled at something when I'm actually not
I mean, I wouldn't give two shits about some manchild playing pretend if there wasn't a concrete possibility of others actually believing you.

[Anonymous No.518260]

>>518258
Creative commons zero.

That means anyone can do anything with it, right?

[Anonymous No.518261]

>>518260
It's public domain then.

[Anonymous No.518262]

>>518259
I know it is retarded to do so but I'm saying legally he can do that.

[Anonymous No.518263]

>>518262
Nope.
Moral rights aren't waivable in the civilized world.

And CC0 is a special kind of public domain. OP can't release his work in the public domain, he doesn't hold the rights to it, Disney does. Judy Hopps is a copyrighted character.
He may choose to distribute his file freely, but Disney can take it down whenever they want, just like any other piece of fanart.

Not just that, even if it was a completely original piece, some jurisdictions prohibit you from voluntarily surrendering your copyrights.

Public domain means the copyrights have expired, or they never existed in the first place due to some special law.
CC0 means the author wishes for his work to be public domain, but a court of law may not recognize it as such.

[Anonymous No.518264]

>>518200
>>518025
>>517871
>>517802
>>517800
>>517723

[Anonymous No.518267]

That's all i can do. The first time i ever used a 3d software.

[Anonymous No.518270]

>>518267
11/10

[Anonymous No.518271]

>>517723
Wait, so did OP steal the work or what?

I never bothered making a blendswap account, what's the difference between what OP posted and this .blend?

If OP took it and improved it somehow, I'm sort of okay with that. If they just look really similar that's pretty understandable too, since so much concept art and actual shots from the movie exist (and it's a relatively uncomplicated / cartoony character)

[Anonymous No.518273]

>>518270
I can't edit facial animation(i move teeth and such), what am i doing wrong?

[Anonymous No.518275]

>>517871
You've changed her personality in a single pose. Interesting.

[Anonymous No.518276]

>>518271
Yes, OP made it.

Any retard could figure that out if they checked the date on that link the accuser shared.

This thread was made on 03/31/16 at 8:23PM
That website shared it sometime the next day, given that the URL says 04 (April) of 2016.

[Anonymous No.518280]

>>518273
read the warning at the top of your screen

[Anonymous No.518281]

>>518273
>>518280
Or the fucking thread. Fuck.

[Anonymous No.518282]

>>518263
> but Disney can take it down whenever they want, just like any other piece of fanart.

No, they can't do that. Fan art is protected by law.

[Anonymous No.518283]

>>518281
Okay, i figured that out but then i reload script in trusted mode, face works but FK arm controls won't work anymore.

[Anonymous No.518287]

>>518072
Thanks for being a watchful guardian Anon. You applied for a janitor position yet?

[Anonymous No.518290]

Time for my stupid question. I've got everything working and want to edit some parts of the model and it's textures, but the mesh is green and unselectable. Can't even click it. My question is, what is going on? Why can't I go into edit mode or change the model's materials?

[Anonymous No.518291]

lewds when?

[Anonymous No.518292]

>>518290
Green means the model is in a group. I put all the rig and the meshes into a group named judy to make appending into other scenes easy. To answer your question, go to the outliner where all the objects are listed, and check the cursor icon between the eyeball and the camera. That disables selection, which I usually put on meshes in a final rig so increase selection speed and make selecting bones easier.

[Anonymous No.518293]

>>518292

Alright. Thanks. I wanted to animate some stuff, but my computer is too old and low quality to do anything serious without taking hours.

[Anonymous No.518294]

>>518293
Yeah, animating with this model as it currently is set up is not very feasible. >>518025 Was only renderable because I have remote desktop set up on my main computer with semi-decent GPUs.

[Anonymous No.518295]

>>518291
>those hands
so velvety soft looking.. Imagine how they'd feel cupped around your balls

[Anonymous No.518296]

>>518295

[Anonymous No.518299]

And so I made this, don't know how to import tanks and Hitler with textures though.

[Anonymous No.518302]

>>518299

[Anonymous No.518303]

Quick and sloppy animation test to see if things look okay with settings turned down. I want to see if I can turn the fur back on without causing it to slow to a crawl.

[Anonymous No.518307]

>>517547
Dang op I wish this had more access to judy's facial bones. It's not squishy enough ;-;

[Anonymous No.518311]

>>518307
Here's with different camera/lighting.

[Anonymous No.518319]

>>518200
Does not look correct

[Anonymous No.518329]

>>518311
Is it me or does this model's nose always seems flared?

[Anonymous No.518338]

>>518063
>being this autistic

[Anonymous No.518344]

>>517756
Textures: 8/10
Fur: 0/10

[Anonymous No.518345]

>>517923
that is NOT how a baseball bat looks
try it again. the base is pinched way more, rounder, and not as big.

[Anonymous No.518347]

>>518030
hide all shitposters
ignore all shitpost threads
report all shitposters

[Anonymous No.518352]

>>518345
Shut up! It's stylized proportions!

[Anonymous No.518354]

>>517640
as close as i could

[Anonymous No.518364]

>>518307
squishy judy best judy

[Anonymous No.518366]

>>517652
What do you mean you again ? Do you know how many fapsters are out there who are dying for one decent elsa porn ?

[Anonymous No.518368]

>>518354
Oh baby

[Anonymous No.518369]

>>518345
>that is NOT how a baseball bat looks
I'm not going to go all out just for one shitty joke.

[Anonymous No.518371]

WHERE
ARE
NUDES

[Anonymous No.518374]

>>518371
On 7chan.

[Anonymous No.518375]

>/3/ can never shut their faces about how they hate blender

>one day they see this bunny as .blend and turn into pic related

>a few minutes later they find themselves using blender

The feelings they feel must be interesting. The cognitive dissonance must be staggering.
They must feel really dirty for this fap.

[Anonymous No.518379]

>>518375
>They must feel really dirty for this fap.
Not only for using blender, let's not forget that this is furry territory at this point.

[Anonymous No.518381]

>>518366
Oh, I do. There is however one easy to spot retard that posts the same things over and over again fucking everywhere. It's tiring, because he acts like an entitled cunt all the time.

[Anonymous No.518384]

>>518375
My guess is people hate blenderfanboys, not really the actual program.
I hate Maya and Cinema 4d for several reasons, but i also use them.

[Anonymous No.518391]

You know I'm not that worried about the porn being made about this movie so much as the fanfics.

I'm almost scared to see them.

[Anonymous No.518392]

>>518391
I'm sure that there's at least one strangulation and crucifixion fetish fic being worked on at this very moment.

[Anonymous No.518393]

>>518392
Don't forget that it is probably a self insert too.

[Anonymous No.518395]

>>518393
And they're on a desert island too.

[Anonymous No.518396]

>>518395
>desert island
Is this some strange fetish I'm not aware about?

Oh and don't forget the vore fanfics too. All types of vore.

[Anonymous No.518397]

>>518396
>strange fetish
Only if you self insert into a character, and then insert a real person into another character, have them end up on a deserted islands and fucking like rabbits lusting after one another.
It's a real fic, I'm not even kidding bruh. Not zootopia, but the retard is probably already writing strangulation Judy fics and that's how it started in Frozen fics for him. It's one of those things where you really wish you have gouged your eyes out before reading.

[Anonymous No.518398]

>>518397
Who did such a thing? You say "him" but who is he?

[Anonymous No.518406]

The amount of Furryfags in /3/ is Disturbing.

Fuck Zootopia, Fuck Furfag

Go back to >>>/trash/ or >>>/b/ or Die.

[Anonymous No.518407]

>>518406
You mean all 7 people?

[Anonymous No.518408]

>>518406
welcome to 4chin :^)

[Anonymous No.518415]

>>518406
kiss my ass buddy. 2016 is the year furry has hit the mainstream. if you don't have a fursona yet you can get the FUCK OUT

[Anonymous No.518417]

>>518415
Furfags will never be mainstream. They are just another dead trend like emos. Furfags are still hiding deep in their closet. If you're openly a furfag in public, you are automatically "that borderline creepy guy with no friends who stays silent and awkwardly looks around"

[Anonymous No.518421]

>>518417
> too pussy to post his garbage work
typical coward madposter :^)

[Anonymous No.518423]

>>518417
hey asshole what's it like to be on the wrong side of history?

[Anonymous No.518426]

>>518423
> f-furfags are the real history right guise ?...guise ?
Get the fuck off you loser forevealone animal fucker creep. You're a lonely wierdo in real life which is why you hide behind your computer like a bitch and even here nobody wants your animal deepthroating ass.

[Anonymous No.518428]

>>518426
>animal fucker

nice ad hom asswipe hahahaha

[Anonymous No.518429]

>>518428
Stop abusing animals you wierdo furfag. Dogs are not your waifus you pathetic loser.

[Anonymous No.518432]

>>517837
>>518039
>>518267
>foodfight2preliminaryrenders.7z

[Anonymous No.518434]

This board is about 3D computer graphics

can anybody who's not from /3/ get out now and go back to their respective containment boards and/or reddit kthx

[Anonymous No.518437]

>>518434
>Implying /3/ is anyone's main board

[Anonymous No.518441]

>>518437
>implying
/3/ /4/ life

[Anonymous No.518453]

>>518406
>>518417
>>518426
>>518429

I suggest you make a bee-line for the nearest copy shop and have around ten thousand of these printed. So you can wallpaper your whole room with these and show everyone how upset you are.

[Anonymous No.518456]

>>518437
fair enough.

it'd be nice to get back on topic, though.

[Anonymous No.518473]

>>518077
Bruh just letting you know you're beyond retarded. Talk about being an ego faggot holding shit head.

[Anonymous No.518474]

Really nice work mate; you captured the face really well. What images of Judy did you reference?

[Anonymous No.518475]

Luxrender Anon here. Had to redo the conversion from Luxcore API to classic Lux API which mostly fixed the issue with the colors of the textures. Mess up the badge and the belt but fuck it I'm not re-rendering this again.

[Anonymous No.518476]

>>518475
Looks a lot better, although IMO the hair still looks nowhere near as good as in cycles.

How much slower is lux classic than luxcore?

[Anonymous No.518479]

>>518476
If you're talking about the original classic Lux rendering modes then it is extremely slow. Like about 9k samples/second slow. At least on my computer for indoor scenes. Outdoor is maybe about 30k. While Luxcore can give at least 100k samples/second without OpenCL. OpenCL GPU mode can give about 1M samples/second for indoors and more for outdoor. At least for me. But it depends on your computer and scene complexity.

Thankfully the luxcore rendering modes are available in classic lux but without all the extra features of the new API.

[Anonymous No.518480]

Actually, looking at screenshots of the movie, looks like the hair around her cheeks is a good deal puffier and longer than in any of the renders here

[Anonymous No.518481]

>>518480
Yep, something like this would be impossible with this rig.

[Anonymous No.518487]

>>518481
I don't know anything about rigging, how much more rigged could the original's be compared to OP's?

[Anonymous No.518490]

>>518487
I'm mainly missing controls for different parts of the nose, the inner/bottom eye corner area, pinching for the inner eyebrow, and the cheeks have only one main control per side. As well, each half of the lower lip probably needs more control as well. If you look at the documentary they released, you can see shots of the face rig, and practically every part of the face is segmented and controllable.

[Anonymous No.518491]

>>518490
How do you bend the fingers? All I seem to be able to control is the end of the finger by the knuckle.

[Anonymous No.518493]

>>518491
scale the finger bone.

[Anonymous No.518495]

>>518493
Thanks.

[Anonymous No.518515]

>>518481
That seems like something you might not want to do at the rig-level anyway, but using free-form deformations/cage deformations/physics.

[Anonymous No.518583]

Can anyone manage an export to .fbx that has the suit rigged instead of the mesh deform cage

[Anonymous No.518584]

>>518481
How the fuck do you even do stuff like this without spending days manually tweaking deformations?

[Anonymous No.518587]

>>518303
I've got a 960 I'd be willing to put to any heavier renders you can't do on your own. I don't know if it'd be faster for small renders (a few hours or so), but bigger stuff would work.

The default Judy.blend scene renders in just over 7 minutes, if you want to compare.

The same offer goes for anyone else in the thread

[Anonymous No.518601]

gib fbx so I can render this in the superior max, v-ray, and hairfarm

[Anonymous No.518620]

>>518584
Physics simulation. I think gisnep simulates muscle deformation using volumetric methods or something.

[Anonymous No.518735]

>>517547
can you make it have sex with something?

[Anonymous No.518736]

>>517931
can you animate it having sex?

[Anonymous No.518738]

>>518200
animate judy having sex!!!
it would blow up the internet

[Anonymous No.518739]

>>518354
animate it naked

[Anonymous No.518740]

>>518200
put a displacement map for the nipples and vay jay jay

[Anonymous No.518851]

>>518271
>>518276
>>517723
ya'll niggas better screencap in case the archives chew it self up once again

[Anonymous No.518896]

Well, you weren't lying "Anon of the 3d". I think it's quite impressive, and notably better than, let's say, the other rigs you've made...

Will be making a test pose rn

[Anonymous No.518905]

>>518077
Are you stupid? This person was inspired by a work of art, so they decided that they wanted to allow others to be able to more freely express their creative side by building a (relatively) easy-to-use-model.

As if you could anything better or more productive than shitposting, you piece of shit. People like you literally make me sick to my stomach. If you're trolling, then congratulations, you've successfully rustled my jimmies.

[Anonymous No.518913]

>>518739
now i have to fix the rig

[Anonymous No.518915]

>>518913
>>518739
fug, i meant to post this one

[Anonymous No.519112]

>>518735
>>518736
>>518738
>>518739
You know you can reply to multiple comments in a single post, right?

[Anonymous No.519429]

>>518915
what's up with the poor hair on the body where the suit was? Just assign the material used for the hands to the body...

[Anonymous No.519636]

alright m8s. I'm new and I have no idea how to use blender. How do I get started?

[Anonymous No.519639]

>>517547
Thank you sir, /trash/ sends our redards

[Anonymous No.519640]

>>519639
>>519636
and if anyone has a link to the /co/ thread, that'd be dope.

[Anonymous No.519642]

>>518267
>>518302
I'm fucking dying
9/11 - very gud

[Anonymous No.519718]

>>517730
Can't find them, what threads do you speak of?