you know what to do

File: 528 KB, 1500x882, 13904166232071.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Wed Feb 5 08:46:32 2014 No.408285 [DELETED]

you know what to do

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 08:48:02 2014 No.408287 File: 909 KB, 2000x1500, censored.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] here you go a censored version of bug girl ! Now you can show it to your mum. Made a textured version, but didnt like it.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 09:02:31 2014 No.408292 >>408287 Now make a low poly

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 09:03:01 2014 No.408293 >>408292 why? modern video cards are powerful engouh that you would never really need to go low poly

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 09:05:02 2014 No.408294 >>408293 so you're saying that a character that's about 500k polys is perfectly fine for a video game? i doubt that.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 09:07:01 2014 No.408295 >>408293 Because a game is not made from a obscure ant-wasp-titmonster alone. Without a proper low poly model (low depends on what the model is made for, for animation it can be relatively highpoly) your work is not complete, and not very impressive.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 09:12:01 2014 No.408296 >>408294 try 12 mln

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 09:14:31 2014 No.408297 >>408296 name any current game that's actually been released that does this. And don't include tessellation.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 09:37:01 2014 No.408299 >>408297 oh im the guy who posted the wip, as for such high poly scenes, dosnt star citizen aim for 10mln polies at any time or something like that ? If recall single ships will go as high as 10mln tris. Also 12mln quads is 24 mln tris ;f

Anonymous Wed Feb 5 09:44:52 2014 No.408301

>>408297
None, we've had that polycount denier in here for quite some time, what happened was he was listening to some talk stressing
the importance of minimizing drawcalls, because there is this bottleneck in streaming over information onto the GPU,
so having like one chunk of geometry that is 1 million polygons is kind of fine, having 1000 objects with a 1000 polygons each is not.
Then the guy extrapolated this, by being a r/3/tard, and though this: "herpa-derp polycount doesn't matter only draw call matter derpa-herp"

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 09:48:22 2014 No.408302 >>408294 >>408295 you guys just got tricked

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 09:52:52 2014 No.408303 >>408299 nigga u must be high

Anonymous Wed Feb 5 10:01:22 2014 No.408304

>>408299

Sounds high but not impossible, the key to understand if those figures are correct is that a starship is a static piece of geometry,
it doesn't do costly deformations to skinweights on bones and so forth, and the action takes place in space - no polybudget needed for backgrounds since it's all empty.

As long as there is just one ship on screen you could have it in many millions of polygons on current day systems, the problem is what happens when you wanna have a fleet of starships.
Then you gotta start LOD everything cause while one 10 million ship is kind of fine, a few more of them is not.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 10:42:22 2014 No.408307 File: 230 KB, 800x800, TEXTTT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>408287 And a quick mashup for a texture number 2 i dont know if i want this gradient to orange or not

Anonymous Wed Feb 5 11:09:22 2014 No.408311

>>408295
>Without a proper low poly model (low depends on what the model is made for, for animation it can be relatively highpoly) your work is not complete, and not very impressive.

Tell that to michelangelo and his sculpts.
Inb4 this is no david, the idea of a sculpt is just that, a sculpt.
Unless you just want to show of you lol low poly baking skills there is n reason for it,.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 11:17:52 2014 No.408312 >>408311 hello, autism

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 11:18:22 2014 No.408313 File: 351 KB, 1400x800, TEXTTT 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>408307 And shaded test, yeah the orange isnt needed at all.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 11:19:53 2014 No.408314 >>408313 terrible, but you already knew that

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 11:21:23 2014 No.408315 >>408312 >shitposting

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 11:36:53 2014 No.408316 >>408314 thanks

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 14:03:50 2014 No.408337 File: 181 KB, 540x960, Big Guy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] How is my anatomy?

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 14:04:50 2014 No.408339 >>408337 3/10 im not even sure if its supposed to be stylized or not

>>	Jezzter Ricardiero Wed Feb 5 14:08:50 2014 No.408341 >>408337 Shitty. But a tip: Do not use Cycles for such renderings. Use Blender internal, a darker background, and the famous three-light-setting (with the main light for shadows) for lighting. Would look much better.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 14:14:20 2014 No.408343 File: 1.36 MB, 3112x3000, insect girl text1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>408313 K, im bored with this for now gotta make something else maybe some dynamic pose anatomy studies

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 18:33:37 2014 No.408361 File: 419 KB, 992x939, preview.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] This will take a long time to finish.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 19:15:54 2014 No.408366 >>408343 >Insect >No mammal >Tits I think there is something you haven't understood.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 19:18:54 2014 No.408367 >>408299 they are using cryengine, which means all those polygons are tesselation polygons.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 19:52:54 2014 No.408373 >>408366 >implying it matters

Anonymous Wed Feb 5 20:01:24 2014 No.408377

>>408367
Okay let's correct this:
Crysis 1, which uses CryEngine 2, does not and never had tesselation for anything other than the ocean (~200,000 polys in view at any given time.) There is no reason that it couldn't have 10mil untesselated polys in view at any given time.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 20:10:58 2014 No.408379 >>408373 No plausibility = shitty model.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 20:12:28 2014 No.408380 >>408377 Yeah, but not all of them in one single fucking model.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 20:28:28 2014 No.408383 File: 22 KB, 960x540, 0017.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 21:47:58 2014 No.408390 >>408343 This is pretty awesome.

>>	None !LsaburoMl6 Wed Feb 5 22:58:05 2014 No.408415 File: 246 KB, 968x741, スペースキャリア.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 23:20:09 2014 No.408417 File: 231 KB, 400x750, Angel.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 6 02:55:04 2014 No.408451 >>408380 On the contrary having 10mil polys in one model is more efficient than having 10mil polys spread out over 10000 objects. Drawcalls and whatnot.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 6 02:57:04 2014 No.408452 >>408417 can you please stop posting that fucking angel everywhere and I can swear that it gets worse for every time you post it.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 6 04:28:38 2014 No.408454 >>408311 Well, if it's for a game rather than a still render then you'll still need a low-poly Besides, modern games use a low-poly + a bump-map texture + shader from what I gather

Anonymous Thu Feb 6 05:04:38 2014 No.408457

>>408454
Plus tessellation if they do so choose. What the guy seems to misunderstand is that low poly doesn't mean it has to be like 5k polys. If it's for a modern game it could easily be about 50k polys which is high enough for a character. No sculpt is impressive unless you make a decent look low poly with good bakes.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 6 07:32:18 2014 No.408472 >>408415 there are no vertical engines. this ship couldn't even start.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 6 07:40:18 2014 No.408475 >>408472 >there are no vertical engines. fucking major kek

Anonymous Thu Feb 6 07:48:18 2014 No.408477
File: 201 KB, 1086x758, Yaris4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

2008 Toyota Yaris I'm working on. My first high poly car.

I'm currently working on the black bit at the bottom of the windscreen. Still have to do the bit where the side mirrors come out, and the wheel bays - then I can start working on a higher poly version that I can bake onto it later.

I doubt I'll be doing interiors, and if I do, they'll be just enough so it doesn't look too bad through the windows.

I'm planning on using it for some animations later. Compositing it into real footage and the like.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 6 08:06:19 2014 No.408478 File: 369 KB, 1086x758, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>408477 fix this before going any further.

Anonymous Thu Feb 6 08:18:48 2014 No.408479

>>408366
Shes a new class of animals that shares both characteristics of mammals and insects, a hybrid.
I call them ... insect girls.
Where is your implausibility now ?
>>408457
What i do understand is that low poly requires additional work, not only would i have to do a retopo, make non shit uv map, set up smoothing groups where needed or decide to use 1 group, and then prepare a cage for normal bake, and bake the normal itself.
And then find something to render it with, all this work with nothing gained.
>No sculpt is impressive unless you make a decent look low poly with good bakes.
Then again you seem to just be trolling/
>>408390
thanks

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 6 08:31:18 2014 No.408481 >>408479 >Where is your implausibility now? It is not plausible a insect and a mammal can create offspring like this. What's this with your obsession for implausible shit?

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 6 09:33:24 2014 No.408483 >>408481 its plausible. an ant was bitten by a human. she survived and became the first hybrid.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 6 09:57:27 2014 No.408488 >>408472 >implying it has to lift

Anonymous Thu Feb 6 11:13:57 2014 No.408500

>>408481
Both insect and all mammals share a common ancestor, while the genetic differences are now too big for natural procreation both genetic manipulation and evolution of insects allows for ir.
If we finally destroy earths climate and wipe our self out, the next race to become the next wave of alpha predators might have an exoskeleton instead of bones just like insects do.

Anonymous Thu Feb 6 11:19:57 2014 No.408502

>>408500
>, while the genetic differences are now too big for natural procreation both genetic manipulation and evolution of insects allows for ir.

Bullshit, especially the evolution part. There is no way a insect and a mammal could have offspring. And injecting some genes is not comparable to offspring. Reality is not a Alien movie. Your elaborations make no sense.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 6 11:27:27 2014 No.408505 >>408502 see >>408483, kid

Anonymous Thu Feb 6 11:42:57 2014 No.408507

>>408502
Did you even read my posts or just talk out of your ass while linking to random posts above you ?
As i said, naturally, not.
But insect over few millions years could evolve into humans ... or anything other, even creatures sharing all characteristics of every animal class we know today.
Hell, not more than 100 thousand years ago we were not much more than ugly monkeys.
Turtles almost do have an exoskeleton, with their spine being merged into their shell, and having no bones in their torso.

Or we could engineer a creature like that, huge part of human genome is already encoded, in 20-30 years we will have everything,, and by 30 years more we should be able to create artificial dna strands.

Bottom line, there is nothing stopping fantastic creatures from having tits, good design is more about the balance, muscle mass distribution, skeletal structure, be it exoskeleton or bones and about design consistency.

I just think you are a faggot.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 6 11:51:57 2014 No.408510 File: 77 KB, 437x400, ObviousTroll.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>408502 >>408481 >>408379 >>408366

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 7 03:05:51 2014 No.408687 File: 1.00 MB, 2048x2048, daily#164.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] didn't know what to make, so i made my coffee. Going to make the sleeve later

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 7 03:18:20 2014 No.408688 >>408343 im sorry but the breasts on that thing look completely stupid and out of place can you sererate your dick from your hobby work please

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 7 06:08:24 2014 No.408695 >>408479 seems just like you don't know the definition of trolling, doubt you'll ever get work if you're not willing to actually put any effort into your work.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 7 08:17:54 2014 No.408703 File: 133 KB, 500x600, oldpp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 7 09:27:52 2014 No.408720 >>408688 but my dick is my hobby >>408695 >2014 >having a job >not having rich parents

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 7 14:40:47 2014 No.408748 >>408361 nice.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 7 15:35:54 2014 No.408752 >>408748 Thanks, first time doing hard surface.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 7 15:46:24 2014 No.408755 >>408343 Your model is really cool. It inspires me.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 7 15:48:24 2014 No.408756 >>408703 That's neat. What are you rendering that in?

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 7 16:23:24 2014 No.408764 >>408756 Thanks, Rendered with mental ray in 3ds Max Sculpted in ZBrush

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 7 19:49:54 2014 No.408789 File: 71 KB, 1027x802, SuperLady.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Was playing around with this, just fiddling till I get an idea for something as cool as big tits monster bug lady up there.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 7 20:09:53 2014 No.408795 File: 756 KB, 1086x758, fixitfaget.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>408478 He has more than that to fix.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 7 21:21:22 2014 No.408817 >>408688 >>408695 Nope, you lack imagination. Seriously, suspension of disbelief applies to all form of art, even if it doesn't make sense.

>>	None !LsaburoMl6 Fri Feb 7 23:05:10 2014 No.408835 File: 213 KB, 1110x692, space carrier 3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 7 23:12:10 2014 No.408837 >>408835 homeworld ? the design is terrible tbh

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 7 23:51:40 2014 No.408844 >>408835 >lets put a big hole in our spaceship to expose the unarmoured parts

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 00:32:11 2014 No.408851 >>408837 It isn't terrible, I like where control room is putted.

Anonymous Sat Feb 8 01:12:40 2014 No.408852
File: 496 KB, 1709x395, IverJohnson2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Shotgun guy here again.

Haven't touched this in a while, picked it up today to work on. Could I get some texturing critiques? I've been toying with various shades and finishes for the wooden areas, and I can't quite settle on the right one. Looking at the real shotgun next to me, it has a very very dark, shiny heavily varnished stock, which looks like crap so I've only given this one a "light" coat.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 01:13:40 2014 No.408853 File: 901 KB, 1427x1008, IverJohnson1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Second WIP

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 01:31:10 2014 No.408855 >>408844 It's called a loading/cargo bay you retard. The door for it is probably just up, or he's deciding to go with a force-field type design.

Anonymous Sat Feb 8 09:12:26 2014 No.408868
File: 180 KB, 1080x624, texwip4[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>408853
Those missing ornaments in the middle of the rifle don't look good, make up your mind what to do with it, but don't leave such unnatural whole there.

Also: wood needs work. See pic. Keep posted.

>>	Millenia !!xWvLgnQxnf6 Sat Feb 8 10:21:44 2014 No.408877 File: 586 KB, 1024x836, eotech_w1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Guns, you say? Texturing attachments for this M4 I finished back in October so I can actually release it. EOTech model by ImBrokeRU

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 10:25:44 2014 No.408878 >>408877 yawn, image isnt even using linear workflow

Anonymous Sat Feb 8 17:57:05 2014 No.408913
File: 110 KB, 1920x1080, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>408868
Just curious, by missing ornaments, do you mean the engravings on this mid-section? Alrighty, I'll get right on it and see what I can do. The texture is still WIP so some areas still need a lot of work.

As for the wood, I'll start adding some flaking/peeling of the varnish to give it a good look, thanks for the tips!

Anonymous Sat Feb 8 18:27:05 2014 No.408918
File: 204 KB, 1709x395, Untitled-1 copy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>408913
What the pic says.

By the way, why are you working on so few polys? You could make alpha from those ornaments and instead of texturing them actually sculpt in the metal.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 18:40:35 2014 No.408921 >>408878 buttmad billy over here

Anonymous Sat Feb 8 18:49:38 2014 No.408922

>>408918
I guess I've been stuck in the "old days". When I used to model weapons, it was for source engine (around 2005) and the polycount limit for viewmodels was around 3000 back then. I've really got to start bumping up the amount of detail I use.

If I ever do a high poly model though, I'll be cramming in as much detail as I possibly can with reckless disregard for polycount figures.

Anonymous Sat Feb 8 19:04:08 2014 No.408924

I'm pretty new to 3d and something has been bothering me.

What are the different "maps" used for?

I know what a UV map is, but I hear terms like light map, normal map, specular map, diffuse map, and a million others I'm forgetting thrown around. Where can I learn about these and how they are used?

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 19:11:38 2014 No.408925 File: 384 KB, 1031x655, SHIP3.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Been ages since I've used maya so I'm all rusty. Trying to design some ships for my game. This one is still needs a lot of touching up and additional detail and textures.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 19:27:38 2014 No.408931 File: 101 KB, 867x436, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sat Feb 8 19:30:38 2014 No.408932

>>408817
>suspension of disbelief applies to all form of art

>have no understanding of a subject
>scream suspension of disbelief when criticized.

Suspension of disbelief, doesn't shield work from criticism, nor does it create magical shield that negates reason.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 19:47:38 2014 No.408935 File: 1.53 MB, 3050x768, TitBugs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>408932 No I understood the concept behind the sculpt, it's based off of this image. Stop being a goddamned nitpicker.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 19:49:08 2014 No.408936 >>408935 >No I understood the concept behind the sculpt sculpt is shit, image is shit, you're shit, and no amount of suspension of disbelief will change the fact you do not understand this.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 19:51:08 2014 No.408937 >>408936 Okay, what about this: You can slap tits on just about anything and everything just for the fun of it.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 19:52:38 2014 No.408938 >>408937 You can sexualize everything, and make porn out of everything. If you're against rule 34, then too bad.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 19:55:39 2014 No.408940 >>408938 >You can sexualize everything, and make porn out of everything. Doesn't make it any less shit.

Anonymous Sat Feb 8 19:56:08 2014 No.408942

>>408937
>>408935
>>408938
You seem to misunderstand the argument, the argument here is not that you are not allowed to do it, the argument is that its shit and "suspension of disbelief" is not a fucking excuse, you can say Jesus told you to make it, still won't make it any less shit. any excuse will not change the fact its absolute rubbish.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 19:56:38 2014 No.408941 >>408940 and what make it so shitty about it then?

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 19:58:38 2014 No.408944 >>408942 Seriously, give me a good concrete reason why it's shit? Other, the only shit I see around here is you.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 20:00:09 2014 No.408945 >>408944 And don't give me that plausibility bullshit.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 20:13:38 2014 No.408947 >>408944 >>408945 >Give me a reason why its shit but don't give me any reasons I disagree with because suspension of disbelief and I like it so it must be good. You know, if you wanna jack off to yourself, you can do it, just don't involve us.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 20:13:38 2014 No.408948 >>408945 If it's about the tits those aren't going away, I already explained it.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 20:18:08 2014 No.408949 >>408947 Anthropomorphic animals isn't plausible, Giant space monsters isn't plausible, yet those were good. Why is this one bad? what made this worst than this: >>403893

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 20:21:38 2014 No.408951 you guys are all fags

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 20:21:38 2014 No.408952 >>408949 >implying both aren't as bad. >>408948 Look, you can always leave, bro.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 20:25:38 2014 No.408954 >>408952 You know what, if you think it's shit, then it's fine by me; as long as it's your opinion.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 20:27:38 2014 No.408956 >>408954 I can assure you that it's his opinion.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 20:32:08 2014 No.408958 >>408956 >>408954 samefagging on this level.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 20:34:08 2014 No.408959 >>408958 >shitposting this hard >>>/out/

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 20:36:38 2014 No.408960 >>408959 >He disagrees with me >must be shitposting >>>/pol/

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 20:37:08 2014 No.408961 >>408960 >he disagrees with me >he must be samefagging seriously though, go back to whatever shithole you crawled out of where it's okay to act like this, ironically or otherwise

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 20:41:08 2014 No.408964 >>408961 He's from reddit. They came invading every board and redirecting people to /paul/ for epick wins and upboats.

Anonymous Sat Feb 8 20:41:38 2014 No.408963

>>408961
>seriously though, go back to whatever shithole you crawled out of where it's okay to act like this

Do you not see the nigger posting tit ants and trying to force everyone to praise him even though we've all already decided its shit?? this is that shitholes.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 20:42:09 2014 No.408965 >>408964 >reddit. >>>/out/

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 20:45:39 2014 No.408967 >>408963 We seen bugs with tits, and yes it's fucked up, but it doesn't mean it's shit. Fuck we even have this: >>403893 Stop speaking for all of us LeFaggot.

Anonymous Sat Feb 8 20:45:39 2014 No.408968

>>408963
I see him asking for criticism with substance beyond "its shit" and "i don't like the idea"

This board runs entirely on user generated content; it's literally what you make it. However, if it's a shithole, you're definitely making it that way, not him.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 21:08:09 2014 No.408970 File: 1.79 MB, 2560x1440, Final.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sat Feb 8 21:09:39 2014 No.408971
File: 989 KB, 512x1536, mudfloor001a.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>408924

1) Diffuse map = Your base texture which shows what colour each part is. Basically a flat, fullbright texture of sorts.

2) http://www.chrisalbeluhn.com/Normal_Map_Tutorial.html

3) Height map = Used for Parallax mapping, an interesting shader often used to create the illusion of depth within a surface that is actually flat.

4) Specular map = Used to determine the amount of shine a material will have to it in various areas. You might have a barrel model with shiny metal bands around it, but the wood would be dull. The specular map would enable you to have one part of the model as being shiny, and another part not reflecting any light.

Best way to learn is to honestly just google it; there are some great tutorials out there which can explain it better than my convoluted paragraphs ever will.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 21:35:39 2014 No.408974 >>408968 You hit the nail right on the head.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 21:44:09 2014 No.408975 >>408971 thanks for the insight >>408970 I like this a whole lot but im not really in a position to criticize it the yellow floor panels could be more defined i guess

Anonymous Sat Feb 8 21:53:09 2014 No.408976

The shit posting in this thread ...
somebody needs to tell moot to give us ids
>>408970
k, maybe it pisses me of since i work in construction,but those tiles above the supporting pillars dont look right, a specialized shape like that just feels off since it would sell, too specific
Try keeping tiles flat.
Anyway too clean, also bottom tiles lack in detail, for marble the pattern is to big and uniform, and for printed tiles it looks too big.

Why jap metro ?

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 8 21:57:39 2014 No.408977 >>408970 How many polys?

Anonymous Sat Feb 8 23:15:51 2014 No.408990
File: 134 KB, 2048x1536, DSC02278.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>408970
You should use a glossiness map on the floor with shoeprints, smudge marks, etc. Very ligthly though, almost unnnoticable.

Also get some large, smooth procedural noise and apply it as a bump, the reflections are too perfect they need wobble and breakup in them.

pic related, wobble

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 03:36:35 2014 No.409019 Noob question here but what's Linear Workflow?

Anonymous Sun Feb 9 04:58:07 2014 No.409025

>>408922

you dont need to use allot of polys, you just need to use enough polys.

for a game, and for a gun in a fps, can you see the polys when you are first person without taking a screenshot and examining it? if not, the gun is good enough.

now enemies, are you engaging the enemies at a distance that you would see the polys? if not, than lower is better. if you are able to, i would tesslate any of the rounded parts of the gun, so when you get closer, more geometry is added with minimal preference hit.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 06:25:00 2014 No.409034 >>408343 Those inverted titties nips smacks lips

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 06:29:30 2014 No.409035 >>408287 >>408307 >>408313 >>408343 Very detailed I love this work. Love the expose breasts and nipples. Think with your dick more often.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 07:37:47 2014 No.409043 File: 228 KB, 1023x794, gorro simulacion.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Harley Quinn Update

Anonymous Sun Feb 9 08:14:34 2014 No.409046

>>408944
People think it's shit because of the tits, and that's a perfectly good reason because it makes it look terrible. honestly if you're the guy who made that horrible mewtwo X and Y sculpt then there's obviously no helping you, fuck, even the people on E621 hated that one.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 12:33:25 2014 No.409081 >>409046 He's the same guy who made that sculpt.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 12:37:55 2014 No.409083 File: 496 KB, 1282x744, 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Update. Arms don't painted yet.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 12:37:55 2014 No.409084 File: 465 KB, 1400x770, MegaMewtwoYSculptRL1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>409046 Like >>408968 said, I'm asking for more constructed feedback. Also, he made that mewtwo sculpt, yet I also gave him a constructed feeback for it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 12:38:25 2014 No.409085 >>409084 the pig nose screws up the whole concept

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 12:43:25 2014 No.409087 File: 23 KB, 288x499, Kornheiser_Why[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>409084 Tits and pussy.

Anonymous Sun Feb 9 12:52:59 2014 No.409091
File: 263 KB, 1600x900, mewtree 17.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>409085
i did change the nose later, which i regret in the end, wasted time,i need to focus on forms instead of pointless details
>>409046
yeah its me, i dont really care if people like it, i only pay attention to comments on the forms anatomy and realization not to ones criticizing the concept of the sculpt
>>409087
why not
>>409035
>>408755
thanks, maybe i should model more often

Also since people seem to think i make every second post in this thread i actually didnt post once since they day i posted the insect girl wip, so chill
im starting to think of tripfagging

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 12:59:29 2014 No.409096 >>409084 constructive

Anonymous Sun Feb 9 13:03:59 2014 No.409099
File: 45 KB, 500x463, 1364246910442.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>409091
About tits and pussy. You have good sculpting technique, but what's painful in those models for me is this so called quasi-naturalism. You're making fucking Pokemon and adding female reproductive organs to it. In case of Insect Girl, it don't strikes so much, but in case of Mew, which in your concept look like little girl this little skinny pussy and ribs makes me cringe. You're mixing whole different concepts and it's not a good thing in this case. But again, it's my opinion.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 13:05:30 2014 No.409100 >>409091 I'm usually into stuff like this but I'd like it a lot more if the nipples and vagoo were gone altogether.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 13:12:00 2014 No.409102 >>409099 dunno, like most my stuff it was a quick evening sculpt, its not like i planned it out, i just find something and just go with it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 13:15:00 2014 No.409103 >>409102 you're going to get banned.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 13:16:00 2014 No.409104 >>409103 There's no porn, only artistic nudity.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 13:21:00 2014 No.409105 >>409104 its explict. This is a work safe board.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 13:22:30 2014 No.409106 FCC pls go

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 13:43:30 2014 No.409110 >>409106 FCC?

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 13:45:30 2014 No.409111 >>409110 it's like FFS but more PC, it stands for 'For Cunts Consideration'

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 13:45:30 2014 No.409112 >>409110 Federal Censorship Committee.

Anonymous Sun Feb 9 13:59:30 2014 No.409118

>>409105
Explicit would be presenting it in a pornographic context (which in the case of a piece of artwork actually would make it more artistic).
We may find people adding sexual organs onto childlike characters disturbing but that depiction is utterly sterile, it's like something out of a medical textbook so you can't say it's explicit.

My own view of this is that it is retarded to make such art, but it is twice as retarded to get offended by it to the degree you wanna censor it.
We live in a culture where it's perfectly normal for a teen to watch terminator jam a chainsaw down someones throat, but if terminator inserts
his finger even one knuckle deep into a pelvic orifice of someone people will go bat-shit banana over it.

Any intelligent observer, not members of our tribe, witnessing this behavior would conclude we're fucked up in the head.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 14:17:00 2014 No.409123 >>409106 >>409110 >>409112 >>409118 Btw, reading trough the old threads it becomes apparent /3/ has a new mod that seems to enforce nudity, that guy who's posted that terrible 'girl with horns' waifu of his has been wiped from >>407969

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 14:27:30 2014 No.409125 >>409123 you know you can delete posts ? /3/ has no mods

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 14:54:06 2014 No.409127 >>409125 Only your own though? Doesn't 4chan bind some kind of temp session user to your ip to track your activity, what's the odds of that guy reaching an epiphany and deleting all of his posts?

>>	None !LsaburoMl6 Sun Feb 9 15:07:35 2014 No.409128 File: 211 KB, 884x757, トランスポート.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 16:12:34 2014 No.409146 File: 586 KB, 1920x1200, Screenshot 2014-02-09 15.11.20.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] game character in higpoly. Missing trousers, gun holster, some straps, and major detail. What more should I add?

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 16:13:04 2014 No.409147 >>408292 THIS. But you should already know that ZRemesher will do the trick.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 16:15:35 2014 No.409149 >>409146 Anatomy.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 17:00:34 2014 No.409156 >>409091 >yeah its me, i dont really care if people like it, i only pay attention to comments on the forms anatomy and realization not to ones criticizing the concept of the sculpt >asspain about people calling his work shit.

Anonymous Sun Feb 9 17:03:04 2014 No.409157

>>409149

Fuck off, all the time with that same one word shitty no-help answer. Anatomy isn't needed for everything.

If someone is playing a game (which that model was for), they don't stop and think, "oh this model is shit, I really wish the hips were more defined, and the bone structure was more realistic"

So shut the fuck up and either, exactly state what is wrong with the anatomy - or any other areas for improvement. That one word shit doesn't help anyone and just ruins this board

Also, congratulations, you got some attention from me, mission achieved right?

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 17:08:04 2014 No.409158 >>409157 kidd, if you wanna improve, you should learn anatomy. What you posted is pure shit

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 17:19:04 2014 No.409159 >>409158 There we go again with that shit criticism

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 17:19:04 2014 No.409160 >>409159 how is it not shit answer it

Anonymous Sun Feb 9 17:20:04 2014 No.409162

>>409158

tbh, I haven't modelled for a few months, as I've lost my passion for 3D and turned more into music production. But I did have a few years where I enjoyed 3D and frequented this board quite a lot. I still come here every so often, once or twice a week to have a browse.

But from when I did do 3D, I kept seeing that shitty 'Anatomy' as an actual critique of someone's work. It still pisses me off, the original 3D model in question, doesn't need anatomy to be a 'good' piece of work.

If it was a realistic high budget film, CGI model, then yeah - anatomy. But for a game, which may or may not have exaggerated features - it's not necessary.

Anatomy is irrelevant in this context, so stop posting it, and again - what exactly is wrong the the anatomy - the model has clothes right? Clothes - which tend to cover up muscle details and curvature of the body.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 17:32:04 2014 No.409164 >>409162 >Anatomy is irrelevant in this context, so stop posting it, nope >what exactly is wrong the the anatomy everything

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 17:36:04 2014 No.409165 >>409160 simple, it's fucking recognisable, I can tell what it is and what he's trying to create. My suggestion for the model itself is to redo the vest, it seems too thick.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 17:40:35 2014 No.409167 >>409164 The problem is that the word 'anatomy' is a buzzword for anyone who unable to give suggestions on how to make the model/artwork better. Be a fucking advocate, pinpoint the problems, and offer a solution.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 17:43:34 2014 No.409169 >>409167 the model is fucking shit, recognize this and move on

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 17:44:34 2014 No.409171 >>409162 >its ok for it to be shit, its not like anybody is expecting anything from me welp, i hope you dont share the same level passion for music as you do for 3d ... >>409167 >anatomy >buzzword jesus, you people give me a headeache

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 17:47:34 2014 No.409172 >>409169 Not until you post more constructive criticism as opposed to "its shit"

Anonymous Sun Feb 9 17:51:34 2014 No.409174

>Board explode over anatomy.

It was a stock answer to a stock mesh. If you want to fix that without using a higher understanding about the human form the question can't be answered.
If you wanna model humans and stay ignorant of the human form, that's a pretty hard position to respect artistically.

>>409162
>It doesn't need to have anatomy in order to be in a game

To be appealing it must. One can tell when stylization has been attempted by someone ignorant of anatomy, look at western anime for example.
It's made by kids studying anime to make anime, instead of artists studying real humans to make cartoons.

>>	The Ant Guy !!cwOD11GTy07 Sun Feb 9 18:11:04 2014 No.409182 >>408343 Don't let these fuckin haters bring you down dude. That's an awesome model.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 18:16:00 2014 No.409184 File: 70 KB, 285x488, 75344441.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] howlowpoly

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 18:19:30 2014 No.409185 >>409184 thats a stupid move. your model is gonna get buried under the heavy shitstorm happening in this thread. wait for the weathers to calm down, post ur werk in the next thread. Because this one is no longer about WIPs.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 18:21:00 2014 No.409188 >>409185 this isnt mine tho. i wanna know how to even start low poly modeling

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 18:25:30 2014 No.409191 >>409185 >heavy shitstorm happening But there isn't. A guy posted a pretty bad model of some man/goblin thing and then got really butthurt when people told him it wasn't great.

Anonymous Sun Feb 9 18:32:17 2014 No.409194

>>409184
I liked what you did with the texture, though not a huge fan of the geosphere you used for the bell.

>>409185
It's still a WIP thread. Though next time one should be made with these rules:

-If it have nudity, censor it; This is a Family friendly board (SFW).

-Give constructive feedback; no "It's good" or "it's shit". Just list what you like about the model and what you hate about it (redline it, if you must). It's also nice that you give suggestions on how to improve it.

-Talk only about the artworks posted on this thread, not the criticism itself.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 19:20:17 2014 No.409202 >>409194 shit post is shit.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 19:33:16 2014 No.409204 File: 724 KB, 1280x720, ScreenShot00005.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Reworked the reflections and changed the scale of the floor tiles. Any better?

Anonymous Sun Feb 9 20:18:36 2014 No.409212
File: 735 KB, 1920x1080, 1391995109699.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>409204
Lacks some detail such as trashcans, cables on the walls, maybe some adverts around, some imperfections like dents, smudges, fractures.

The bumpmap on the floor isn't that visible in my opinion. Also you should drop the opacity of the CA. The glowing is nice imo although, I would increase the radiosity.

Plus I'm guessing you didn't use a higher polygon count because this is for a game. Otherwise you should increase the mesh definition so we don't see the jaggy edges on things like cylinder colons or the curvy top ?

Love the concept btw. I love futuristic glowing shiny stuff.

Anonymous Sun Feb 9 20:52:06 2014 No.409217
File: 968 KB, 1440x900, ScreenShot00006.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>409212
Thanks for the input! And yeah I was going for some sort of game environment, thats why most of the props are lacking polys. I'll probably continue with trashcans and train schedules aswell as letting the whole scene look more used.

Anonymous Sun Feb 9 21:07:36 2014 No.409219

>>409157
"Anatomy" guy here. Jesus, this should be obvious. You're not using any reference. Look and compare. Think how muscles form body.

>face more comic than realistic, wrong proportions
>too big hands
>arms are plasticine, wrong muscles shapes, no bones inside
>clothing beyond everything

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 21:10:06 2014 No.409221 File: 60 KB, 654x491, 1391998259935.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>409219 oh, and the pic Proportions and forms.

Anonymous Sun Feb 9 21:12:06 2014 No.409223

>>409219
>>409221
This guy really should be admired more than hated. He's trying to help people make more normal looking humans by pushing the fact that anatomy matters, and is the key thing behind sculpts. Hell it's some of the first shit they teach you in like 3D Schools, not to mention reference.

Anonymous Sun Feb 9 21:22:11 2014 No.409225

>>409157
One more thing. Check links. This is your goal as it comes to naturalism.

http://www.zbrushcentral.com/showthread.php?170822&p=968970&viewfull=1#post968970

http://www.zbrushcentral.com/showthread.php?81488-mikkamakka-s-Sketchbook&p=1011738&viewfull=1#post1011738

Anonymous Sun Feb 9 21:23:41 2014 No.409226
File: 616 KB, 1200x800, SWFC_Panorama_Night_cut[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>409217
Great work for an ingame. I forgot to add that you should also google shangai. It's probably the brightest and most colorful city at night. You can find lots of references.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 21:39:41 2014 No.409232 >>409219 That's what we're looking for. Just point out the problems instead of generalizing it in one word. >>409223 I think >>409174 already stated that the knowlege of basic anatomy are required to be an visual artist, regardless of the medium.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 22:48:02 2014 No.409238 >>409204 Really good. I thought it was a photograph for a second.

Anonymous Sun Feb 9 22:52:31 2014 No.409239
File: 455 KB, 951x1038, attachment.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>409225
nope. This *isnt* natural unless you're mega dosing anabolic steroids and then took an illegal fatburning agent. This "huge yet lean" look is the result of steroids, like a bodybuilder would use.
*Stop* spreading misinformation

Try again.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 23:29:02 2014 No.409241 >>409239 That type of physique is possible without supplements, drugs, steroids, HGH's etc. Though, it takes a couple of years and a rigorous physical and dietary routine.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 23:31:32 2014 No.409242 >>409241 its not.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 23:32:02 2014 No.409243 >>409225 Christ! That second link is amazing. Thanks bro.

Anonymous Sun Feb 9 23:37:32 2014 No.409245
File: 84 KB, 840x869, this_is_how_bodybuilder_looks.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>409239
So you found one model from many in those sketchbooks and you're claiming I'm spreading misinformation? Yes, this is a bit exaggerated model of human muscles and it shouldn't be taken as a reference to naturalistic model (unless this is the concept). And yet, this is actually good example of muscle flow, exactly because it is exaggerated. Did you even saw other models there or you just stopped at first and proceed with shitposting?

Fuck off.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 23:44:19 2014 No.409247 >>409245 that picture is shopped.

Anonymous Sun Feb 9 23:48:19 2014 No.409249

>>409167
its not a buzzword, everyone can tell the anatomy is shit, but saying why without a reference and making an image for it is hard, something im guessing most people here cant do.

look up an anatomical model, and look at how muscles form. than look at 5-7% body fat people with muscle because thats what most people want to model, and see your mistakes and fix them.

dont post the crap here and expect us to not rip it apart.

say "im learning, what can i do to make it better" and maybe you will get some help, but not for that.

and you want to hide behind "its exaggerated" than fuck the hell off, you aren't going to get better so stop trying.

>>409172

the vest is to thick, the cloth looks like hell, there is definition in some places in the arm, but its to simplified for how little fat there is the face is to big for the head size, the hands are to big for the head size. if i could see more i would probably fine more to bitch about, but perspective wise,the hands look wrong, but that may be prospective fucking with it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 9 23:56:19 2014 No.409254 >>409242 whats not? all that is there is fairly normal sized muscles. you eat less and what you do eat you eat with a purpose, its not impossible, just really fucking hard to get.

Anonymous Mon Feb 10 00:35:52 2014 No.409257
File: 189 KB, 800x800, 1392010548073.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>409184
Whoa i forgot a number in there. I was basically asking how to do low poly characters.

I know how to paint textures rather decently, I'm just complete garbage at modeling.

deleted Mon Feb 10 01:10:22 2014 No.409263

>>409146
Wow, holy shit, I just got to the board and realized someone else is defending my work. I'm actually the one that is making that high poly character.

After reading the posts, well I assure everyone I totally agree on my lack of anatomy skills, but this is my first serious projects. And I wish to keep receiving that constructive criticism.

I will post once I've considered all details mentioned before

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 10 05:41:05 2014 No.409271 File: 289 KB, 920x820, progress2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Making some progress on this guy. Criticism would be appreciated.

Anonymous Mon Feb 10 10:19:46 2014 No.409277
File: 1.08 MB, 3151x1088, Grenade.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

found this I made a couple months ago, thought it might be fun if anyone else have something similar from their progress.
although no textures on any of them, you can still see the modelling progression in 1 year.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 10 11:05:46 2014 No.409280 >>409277 >1 year >No progress Amazing.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 10 11:38:46 2014 No.409281 >>409280 >1 post >0 fucks given troll better

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 10 12:04:16 2014 No.409287 >>408852 Where are your bevels?

Anonymous Mon Feb 10 12:10:46 2014 No.409289

>>409271
First thing that bothers me is the neck, I don't see the muscles required to rotate the head along the axis he is looking at.

Also, forearm muscles twist along the bones, your polygon flow is too straight, even for a cartoon character.

You could achieve something better with the ears aswell, doesn't look plausible, the part where it is attached to the skull is too thin imo

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 10 12:12:46 2014 No.409290 >>409281 He is right though. Even if it's more detailed, the mesh on the right still is shit.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 10 14:18:48 2014 No.409303 >>409277 You should probably post something else that shows your improvements, otherwise you're just gunna get laughed at.

Anonymous Mon Feb 10 14:36:47 2014 No.409305
File: 276 KB, 500x375, ohwell.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>409303
I don't really care.
All I wanted was for people to post some sort of image that showed their progression during a year.
But for some reason people on /3/ prefer to shit on other peoples work rather than posting something themselves.
Oh well!

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 10 18:57:32 2014 No.409341 >>409204 holy shit dat improvement looks fuckin sweet, anon

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 10 20:56:57 2014 No.409368 >>409271 I dislike how the lower half of the face looks like a saucer.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 11 01:33:24 2014 No.409435 Two questions. What does your texturing workflow look like? And..are the 3d tools in PS CS6 Extended worth cracking it for when it comes to texturing?

>>	sakar Tue Feb 11 03:50:33 2014 No.409453 File: 843 KB, 1920x1080, rendercomplete.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>409165 >>409157 >>409159 >>409157 >>409165 I WAS TOO USING A REFERENCE SEE??? I EVEN INCLUDED ANATOMIC NAMES FOR YOU GUIS. STOP INSULTING MY ARTISTIC ABILITY.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 11 07:46:01 2014 No.409468 >>409204 wait, thats real time ?

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 11 10:31:36 2014 No.409489 >>409453 epic strawman bruv

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 11 12:27:30 2014 No.409501 >>409204 Nice. would hire/10 Not even being sarcastic. That's looking seriously nice. Once you add some details like >>409212 suggested, I imagine your scene will look many times better, even though it's pretty fucking neat as it sits right now.

Anonymous Tue Feb 11 13:16:19 2014 No.409506

>>409241
2 years? Are you crazy? A physique like that takes 10+ natty, for the few lucky people who have the genetics for it. The level of leanness is particularly suspicious because the human body is simply not made to hold such a disproportion between muscle and fat. There are natty guys who are very big and strong, but they can't get that lean without losing a ton of muscle

>>	sakar Tue Feb 11 13:28:50 2014 No.409510 >>409489 thanks maine

Anonymous Tue Feb 11 14:21:20 2014 No.409522

>>409506
>10 years
This mass ? 5 years easy natty if you are not staring from 0, maybe 10 if you are a stick. Small pecs, medium at best legs, but huge shoulders and top trapz.
Now this body fat ? Theres your problem, for the photo shoot you can go so low, but for longer than a week and you will die.
Typical bodybuilding routine and extreme dehydration will get you there.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 11 14:22:20 2014 No.409524 >>409522 nope.zip

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 11 15:40:50 2014 No.409551 >>408510 It's even sadder he's in here pretending to be 3-4 anons and replying swiftly to convinced others he's right and all. It's shit like this I don't visit here frequently anymore.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 11 17:16:18 2014 No.409566 File: 1.50 MB, 230x172, 1368835331846.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>409489 please tell me your not critiquing his argument. dear god dude please.

Anonymous Tue Feb 11 17:33:48 2014 No.409573
File: 721 KB, 1280x720, ScreenShot00001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>409468
Yup.
>>409501
T-Thanks! I added some trash cans aswell as some piping to cover up the seams on the ceiling part. Also I'm not able to bake the production lighting at the moment because my computer crashed two times so far, gonna try it at some point later again.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 11 17:37:49 2014 No.409574 >>409573 dumbass, you didnt even use linear workflow yet noobs are still praising it. LMFAO

>>	Tommy Wallnuts Tue Feb 11 17:43:18 2014 No.409576 File: 730 KB, 1920x1200, 1391980339280.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>409263 not to be a dick but that shit sucks

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 11 18:24:48 2014 No.409583 >>409573 You're welcome. It's giving off a Mirror's Edge vibe. By chance was that your inspiration? Looks nice with the trash can. Amazing what a simple prop can do to a scene.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 11 18:46:37 2014 No.409586 >>409573 dont know if udk allows this, but i would pimp up reflection fresnel basically the surface gets more reflecting the further its is from the camera due the angle it faces you changing, reflections seems pretty linear in your scene

Anonymous Tue Feb 11 18:50:07 2014 No.409588
File: 225 KB, 800x533, seoul-subway.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>409583
Inspiration for the whole thing was a picture from a subway station in seoul. The moment when I added the billboards and saw how they are affecting the lighting I changed to something more colorful to see how that would look.

>>	Noradninja Tue Feb 11 18:50:37 2014 No.409587 >>409586 You could do this with a simple ramp on the reflectivity that increases opacity as the surface becomes more parallel to the camera view, similar to how edge glow and outline shaders work.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 11 19:01:07 2014 No.409589 >>409588 you see how the colors in this image are linear...

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 11 19:05:07 2014 No.409591 >>409573 > Look guiz I can make reflective cubes and cylinders Coloring some primitives will get you 3/10.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 11 19:37:07 2014 No.409599 did /3/'s mystery mod just delete the thread with the discussion about the recent clamp down on rendered genitals?

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 11 19:39:37 2014 No.409600 >>409591 I look forward to seeing what you can produce in comparison.

>>	rolandome Tue Feb 11 20:04:43 2014 No.409604 File: 134 KB, 995x498, Sin título.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Industrial Park

Anonymous Tue Feb 11 20:37:13 2014 No.409612

>>409600
Only noobs and faggots try to get people to like their crap with making everything shiny and reflective and glowing, since it contains no modelling or texturing or lighting or composition skills. This is the same level of garbage with reflective glowing spheres people render with cinema4D and deluding themselves like they accomplished something.
Just imagine me posting a photo of a dogshit and compare it with that. That would be a fair comparison.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 11 20:39:14 2014 No.409614 >>409612 Although I hate to shit on any other person's work, this guy speaks some truth.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 11 21:30:13 2014 No.409619 File: 728 KB, 300x207, 1391470308026.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >tfw no one will teach you how to low poly model

>>	The Ant Guy !!cwOD11GTy07 Tue Feb 11 23:20:05 2014 No.409626 File: 74 KB, 615x667, 2014-02-11_2019.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Face finally in a place where I like it. Hair next.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 12 01:36:58 2014 No.409630 >>409604 Are you gonna add textures on that?

>>	sakar Wed Feb 12 01:54:32 2014 No.409632 File: 10 KB, 281x286, 1362794481099.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>409604 >zbrush env modeling

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 12 02:04:02 2014 No.409636 >>409632 its obliviouslyly 3dsmax you penis

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 12 02:04:32 2014 No.409635 File: 45 KB, 1019x484, copyright_maxofsd2_donotsteak3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 12 02:14:32 2014 No.409637 >>409635 throw it away

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 12 02:29:50 2014 No.409641 >>409636 it is, but that color is indeed very zbrushistical

>>	rolandome Wed Feb 12 03:19:20 2014 No.409642 >>409630 Yes, clay view allows me to work faster >>409632 >zbrush I model the whole thing in Autocad... And now i'm addind and modifying some details on 3ds max

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 12 03:54:20 2014 No.409645 >>409619 why don't you stop being a faggot and learn yourself, or perhaps, i dunno, use google.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 12 07:21:19 2014 No.409653 >>409642 >modeling in zbrush autocad stuff commend yourself on being retarded

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 12 07:32:49 2014 No.409655 >>409653 I'm new to /3/ and I'm loving how the people who hardly speak English are just as hostile as everyone else, it's fucking great.

Anonymous Wed Feb 12 08:12:06 2014 No.409658

>>409655
Playing Battlefield on European servers you learn that the english speakers are among the most chillaxed people there is.
People from Poland are perhaps the most aggressive ones you'll come across, they make up a minority of all the players yet it is impossible
to play a game for more than 0.5 seconds without learning that 'kurwa' is polish for 'whore'. They use the word 'whore' as a truely universal denominator.

For example the phrase "A bird sat at the fence chirping" would translate into polish as "whorish winged-whore whored it's whore-song on top of whore-sticks"

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 12 09:28:36 2014 No.409659 >>409247 Haven't you seen steroid freaks before?

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 12 09:31:06 2014 No.409661 >>409626 Needs more geometry in the chest area.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 12 09:39:36 2014 No.409662 >>409635 Needs more geometry in the chest area. Either that or downsize the boobs. They look fucking stupid with the level of detail you have going on. Also the ass is misshapen as fuck. Are you using Hank Hill as a reference?

Anonymous Wed Feb 12 13:36:03 2014 No.409675
File: 528 KB, 1489x1077, 1392230196600.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

last wip thread didn't help me, hoping this will!
so i made a cloth simulation for the sail, it works well.
But i want to attach it to the mast and still keep the simulation so I can animate the ship with the sim still going.
Does anyone know how?

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 12 13:44:02 2014 No.409677 >>409675 Maybe you could just parent the sail to the boat

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 12 13:56:33 2014 No.409679 >>409677 didn't work, gah this is killing me

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 12 13:57:02 2014 No.409680 >>409675 nConstraint -> Transform the vertices you want to hold and then parent the dynamicContraint it creates to the mast?

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 12 14:16:02 2014 No.409682 File: 74 KB, 462x579, daman.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>409680 It worked! Thank you so much. The sail got a bit jiggly when the boat turned but at least it's attached to the mast! Again, thank you

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 12 15:56:30 2014 No.409689 File: 71 KB, 556x731, mazing.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 12 16:09:00 2014 No.409691 >>409689 Zbrush should very much use that model instead of the non-cock one they use now

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 12 18:59:55 2014 No.409703 File: 312 KB, 401x562, DOCTORTRAN.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Can I please have help with this? I need some fresh eyes and opinions/ suggestions.

Anonymous Wed Feb 12 20:14:42 2014 No.409710
File: 168 KB, 1203x562, skullshape.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>409703
I'll echo a tip I gave to another anon, pay more careful attention to the head as a whole and how the shapes interconnect, IE 'study cranial anatomy'.

Here's a quick way to get on the right track with imaginary heads not built in the likeness of anyone in particular, google up a skull, liquify it in PS to get it into the rough dimensions of your head, then restructure your head to fit what you see. Added specular highlight to the eyes just to make them less distracting.

Anonymous Wed Feb 12 20:23:42 2014 No.409711

>>409703
Face should get skinnier right around the eyes. The ears look to lengthy. The nose looks too straight. I'd add some curve, maybe inwards near the eyes. The little indents at the top of the nostrils look strange. Jaw seems too wide. Above the upper lip needs to be reworked. Can do more with the cheeks as well so his face doesn't look so flat.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 12 20:35:42 2014 No.409713 >>409710 >>409703 Is this Anders Brevik?

>>	rolandome Wed Feb 12 20:36:13 2014 No.409714 >>409653 gr8 b8 m8

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 12 20:58:13 2014 No.409719 >>409713 No, Anders did something very very naughty and therefore isn't allowed onto the internet, even if he was it is highly doubtful he'd ever post on /3/. Unless he mistook it for /3rd reich/ of course.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 12 21:54:47 2014 No.409722 File: 34 KB, 928x848, lil grill.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>409719 did he stoled all the candy?

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 12 22:23:50 2014 No.409725 >>409626 i like the face

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 12 22:39:51 2014 No.409726 >>409719 wait.../3/ doesnt stand for 3rd reich ?

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 02:26:17 2014 No.409740 >>409726 I-I have been fooled for so long. >>409722 Candy ist verboten in die Reich!

Anonymous Thu Feb 13 17:44:40 2014 No.409809
File: 153 KB, 383x679, qT2Xp1T.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>409368
Yeah, I tried fixing that.

>>409289
I'm not entirely sure what you're telling me to do with the neck. Should I thicken it up for it to look like there's room for the muscles that hold the head up? The axis he's looking at is straight forward.

I tried to thicken up the ears where they connect per your recommendation.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 18:15:16 2014 No.409810 File: 124 KB, 840x526, bridge1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] in blender

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 18:18:47 2014 No.409811 >>409810 really nothing to crit, it's just about perfect!

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 18:45:47 2014 No.409815 File: 401 KB, 2490x1018, wip.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>409146 here is an update. What do you think? Working on trousers/cloth modeling.

Anonymous Thu Feb 13 19:00:12 2014 No.409819

>>409815
The cloth looks quite a bit better although the symmetry is really apparent and hurts the look quite a bit. the anatomy on the body is still quite off. I would suggest looking at getting a small anatomical model so you can really see how everything looks.

Keep going and you will get better.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 19:35:21 2014 No.409821 File: 624 KB, 960x540, bridge2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>409810 some progress with trees

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 19:43:52 2014 No.409824 >>409821 its bad

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 19:50:51 2014 No.409825 >>409819 Well thank you very much. I know its symmetrical, I plan to add asymetric detail till the end.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 19:58:51 2014 No.409827 File: 44 KB, 834x660, Ring1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] give it to me straight its supposed to be a diamond ring

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 20:54:50 2014 No.409835 >>409815 Its shit.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 22:05:53 2014 No.409840 >>409835 Well.. show us some work of yours?

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 22:20:23 2014 No.409843 File: 136 KB, 886x1000, final_render003.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>409840 Here's an old piece.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 22:21:23 2014 No.409844 >>409843 arnie ? not bad at all

Anonymous Thu Feb 13 23:31:57 2014 No.409850

>>409844
and not good
>>409843
Weird thumbs, pecs end in wrong place, go too far under the shoulder, they wrap around chest too much, deltopectoral triangle shape messed up, clavicular head of pec muscle not connected to the clavicle, serratus anterior muscles too big and pushed too far forward, on top of that the back of them arent covered by latissimus dorsi muscles properly, bumpy and curved sternum, obliques connect in wrong places and go to wrong abs intersections, weird neck, especially the sternocleidomastoid muscle, especially its part behind the ear, and i dunno whats going on around it there, also trapz dont look right but i would have to see a side view... and collapsed cheek bones.
Also hands seem small.

Its shit.

Anonymous Thu Feb 13 23:37:31 2014 No.409851

>>409843
That's a somewhat decent sculpt but I doubt it yours, I'd like to think somebody who've achieved that level of ability would
respect the craft more than referring to lesser artists work as shit, even when it is such.
We've all made shit getting to where we are, just pointing out someone isn't very skilled yet is like stating the obvious
doing so in condescending terms just reflects bad on whoever says it regardless of their own merits.

Not the anon you've been talking to btw, just weighing in.

Anonymous Thu Feb 13 23:44:01 2014 No.409852
File: 627 KB, 1920x1605, collage01.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

A car I've been working on.

Polycount: ~25k
Textures: None yet, except for the textures used by the viewport shaders (reflections mostly)

Hit me with the worst you got, /3/.
Also, guess the 4 cars this is based on.

Anonymous Thu Feb 13 23:46:01 2014 No.409853

>>409619
here is how you do it.

look at what you want, and use as little polys necessary to make the model work. if you are going for a retro feel, no AA of any kind,

snes era - Progressive: 256 × 224, 512 × 224, 256 × 239, 512 × 239
Interlaced: 512 × 448, 512 × 478

n64 era - 256 × 224, 320 × 240 and 640 × 480 pixels

ps1 - Resolutions from 256 × 224 to 640 × 480

ps2 - video output resolution: Variable from 256 x 224 to 1280 x 1024

anything newer than those wouldn't be low poly by low poly standards.

low poly is also more about the texture than it is about the model, so if you really want to make something good, you need to learn to make an immaculate texture

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 23:53:31 2014 No.409855 File: 382 KB, 1500x1500, 9781587790355-01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>409815 the clothing is good/passable, however the human underneath... fuck man, that human... i did a google search, ill dump the images.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 23:54:31 2014 No.409856 File: 167 KB, 1144x987, Li60D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>409855

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 23:56:01 2014 No.409857 File: 64 KB, 532x496, 1musclesatside.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>409856

Anonymous Thu Feb 13 23:59:01 2014 No.409858
File: 93 KB, 300x321, ARM-MUSCLES-SUPERFICIAL-2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>409857

these should give you some idea how muscels are suppose to work, the placement, and what the shapes should be when bulky.

i suggest doing models like the one in
>>409239
realistic amount of bulk or not, it will help you make a believable model by being able to remember the muscles from memory.

though if you just want to go with your model, look at the shoulders, the side view and the arms as those are going to be exposed the most and least able to hide.

Anonymous Fri Feb 14 00:01:31 2014 No.409859

>>409850

You cant be serious... You're trying to nitpick the composition that its not even funny. Ill agree with your comments on the latissimus, clavicle/pectorals/delts and ab intersection but other parts of your critiques were simply wrong or exaggerated. I want to see how you fare - please post one of your works for evaluation.

Anonymous Fri Feb 14 00:11:31 2014 No.409861

>>409851

That comment about "Respecting the craft" is hogwash. Anon asked for critiques, he got some (some critiques were asinine while others were thought out). Anon should be prepared to receive "brutal" honesty - especially here, of all places.

He stubbornly tried to defend his work, knowing full-well that some anons were correct/justified. His second submission showed no significant improvements, he blatantly ignored all the feedback that was given to him and had the audacity to ask, yet again, "what do you think"?

Someone like him deserves to be ignored or shit-on. Anon doesn't want to improve, he wants validation.

Anonymous Fri Feb 14 00:40:36 2014 No.409864

The anon working on the "horrible" human, here.
This is a small school project where I need to draw>model>sculpt>texture>rig>animate>integrate in unity.

So, I appreciate very much your criticism, and I'm aware it's not a great job. But I will comeback with something better.

>>409855
>>409856
>>409857
>>409858

Thank you very much, saved them for the next model !

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 14 00:41:36 2014 No.409865 >>409852 Looks like a crossbreed between a Nissan skyline, Honda NSX, mazda RX7 and Toyota Supra. Basically all the big name JGTC cars from the previous generation I like it, 'would crash on nürburgring ring' / 10

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 14 01:13:18 2014 No.409868 >>408925 agdg brother

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 14 01:17:18 2014 No.409869 >>409864 dont think of it as a small school project, its a foundation you will forever build on

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 14 05:59:47 2014 No.409899 File: 29 KB, 638x459, Capture.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3R5iOGJXVI only look at the camera tracking

Anonymous Fri Feb 14 08:11:27 2014 No.409906

>>408932
You previously said that life is not an Aliens movie.
These are fucking 3D cartoon characters.
Why are you complaining about realism in a creative medium?
Do you go into Pixar films and get pissed off that the toys are talking? Or that the cars have eyeballs in their windshields?

Anonymous Fri Feb 14 08:45:28 2014 No.409907
File: 146 KB, 779x837, all day bro.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>409859
>You're trying to nitpick the composition that its not even funny.

The word composition dosnt mean what you think it does, google it, should save you some embarrassment one day.

And if i really wanted to be nitpicky i would mention how each head of the trapezoid muscle goes into the wrong spot, and how the curvature of the muscle fibers intersections is wrong, especially the anterior deltoid which seems to be connected to the biceps ?

Regardless, why should i post my work, what difference does it make, i just find it ironic that someone who calls others work shit then proudly posts a crappy anatomy study himself.
I dont go around calling others works shit, unless its a case like this where someone is literally asking for me to do that, since i am conscious of my own shortcomings.

But if you really want, i made the insect girl among others.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 14 08:47:28 2014 No.409908 >>409907 And i know bottom obliques go too low, making his ass seem to go half way into his back, i have no idea what i was thinking, i just wanted the to go to his shorts i guess.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 14 11:10:59 2014 No.409911 >>408877 Millenia, the reticle on eotech's aren't fucking projected onto the rear lens you twat. 0/10

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 14 11:10:59 2014 No.409912 >>409865 Nissan Skyline is correct. The other cars are Ferrari 599XX, Porsche 918, and Pontiac Solstice. That JGTC/GT500 look is exactly what I wanted to achieve, thanks!

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 14 13:33:56 2014 No.409922 >>409911 Holographics will probably end up being added in post lel

Anonymous Fri Feb 14 13:43:26 2014 No.409925

>>409612
>Just imagine me posting a photo of a dogshit and compare it with that. That would be a fair comparison

I guess we would have to imagine that you can post any pics to prove you have any comparable skill.
This anon simply showed his work, it looks fine, it's effective and all he did was show his work and accept advice on making it better.
I'm not saying it's fucking beautiful, I'm saying that the guy has some skill compared to the zbrushed demon heads and constant Joan of arc female bodies that get posted.
But hey, keep bitching and whining, I'm sure it makes you feel better somehow, otherwise, why do it right?

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 14 15:53:35 2014 No.409934 File: 149 KB, 779x837, teh fuck bruh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>409907

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 14 16:45:07 2014 No.409936 >>409934 And your circle supposed to mean what ? I see nothing wrong there, maybe bottom of his scapula should be a bit more defined for his insane musculature, but it would depend on the workout for such a physique.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 14 17:17:37 2014 No.409940 >>409907 >>409934 A. You need to do a better Job at redlining B. At the very least praise him on what he done right. It's bad, but it's beyond shit (shit like RatBoy Genius).

Anonymous Fri Feb 14 17:44:29 2014 No.409943

>>409940
He was pointing out several small anatomy issues to another guy in an extremely annoying fashion. I expected him to actually know anatomy when he's nitpicking others for theirs, so I just circled the part where most of his issues lie.

>>409936
Look up some back anatomy, the muscle structure is way off. Also, take a look at how the upper arm muscles and the shoulder muscles meet, your rear upper arm/shoulder isn't right.
Front upper body looks good, can't see issues there.

Anonymous Fri Feb 14 18:58:02 2014 No.409949
File: 233 KB, 2278x821, get wercked.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>409943
As i said, i tend to half ass some areas of my models, some of the forms there are bit wonky to say the least, but fuck me, get some more anatomy knowledge before you comment.

Still im in a good mood so i prepared an anatomy lesson for you, now with real life examples !!
Since not everybody is 4% bodyfat like a dehydrated bodybuilder the split between the triceps and the posterior deltoid muscle is almost not noticeable, since thats what i assume you tried to say.
Also the 3d scan and the random guy isnt the same guy, in case it creates some confusion, just random picks from google i took now.

If you still think there is something wrong with my back, i would like you to point out with an example or with exact description.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 14 19:43:05 2014 No.409952 File: 618 KB, 2278x821, 1392422336222.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>409949 I just waster ten minutes of my life, I hope you're happy.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 14 19:54:35 2014 No.409954 >>409952 actually you didn't, you just helped him improved. Unless you're talking about posting in this topic; then yes, you wasted hours of your life on an artwork noone cares about.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 14 20:34:05 2014 No.409960 >>409949 >Bought a 3d scan from Ten24 I don't suppose you're willing to share that?

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 14 22:32:13 2014 No.409972 >>409907 That sculpt is shit. You should make like a banana and hang yourself.

Anonymous Fri Feb 14 23:06:01 2014 No.409974

>>409949
you are an annoying fuck and >>409952 is right in every way
i am no way a pro at anatomy but i can see there are flaws in your model, notably with the angle of scapula that is completely horizontal. deltopectoral triangle shape is messed up
symmetrical abs. No sign of clavicular portion of mastoid. landmark presence of anterior superior illiac spine to mide, destroying sacral triangle. Pillar of mouth looks retrded with mentolabial sulcus way to close to lip.

shouldre/tricep relationship completely fucked.

But of course you think that all i said is wrong because you are amazing and god of universe. keep that mindest and you'll go far

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 14 23:58:32 2014 No.409985 File: 30 KB, 382x376, ss (2014-02-14 at 09.57.23).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] How would I go about modeling the melty candle bit on top of mr litwik. His hair area?

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 00:12:48 2014 No.409986 File: 231 KB, 779x837, nigga_please.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>409907 You're welcome.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 00:17:18 2014 No.409987 File: 243 KB, 779x837, bitch_please.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>409907 Here you go, buddy.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 00:52:21 2014 No.409989 >>409987 You're obnoxious and you never get any work done.

Anonymous Sat Feb 15 00:52:21 2014 No.409990
File: 400 KB, 640x4320, Candle blobmesh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>409985
put bunch of sphere meshes together, then use wrapit to wrap a mesh to fuse them together in one mesh. Then meshsmooth it.
You will get a mushy blobby mesh with super topology.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 00:57:20 2014 No.409991 >>409989 Cheer up, guy. Go for a walk and get some fresh air in your system.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 01:02:20 2014 No.409992 >>409991 I have been. Once you're outside you realize how little stuff like this matters. If you finish your projects, they'll be enjoyed a lot more than if you wait and scrutinize over every little thing and create a bunch of half projects.

Anonymous Sat Feb 15 02:04:09 2014 No.409994
File: 33 KB, 522x434, ss (2014-02-15 at 12.03.30).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>409990
Its interesting I have never used zbrush before but I felt like this model was a zbrush situation. Might get into zbrush I suppose. Here in maya doing my best though.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 02:05:39 2014 No.409995 >>409992 On the other hand fixing the tiniest details will really build a good work ethic and you will get a lot of respect.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 03:31:45 2014 No.410006 File: 27 KB, 562x528, ss (2014-02-15 at 01.30.41).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>409994 Damn I wanted this to look good. How do I make it better? This is awful Im gonna squish him out

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 03:39:14 2014 No.410007 >>410006 You could try making the flame stacked 3d shapes with inverted normals. I think it could more match the feeling of the original.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 03:58:44 2014 No.410009 >>410007 Wow what

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 06:08:39 2014 No.410012 >>409827 how the fuck is it supposed to hold together?

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 06:19:09 2014 No.410013 File: 19 KB, 756x223, 0923418098534.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>410009 Like dis.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 07:57:39 2014 No.410028 File: 49 KB, 816x561, first go.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Had my first go at mudbox today :) hope you love it as much as i do

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 09:09:33 2014 No.410034 File: 193 KB, 800x600, trgfh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] iv still some to do on this model but i want to be moved on to making some clothes and a rig in the next day or 2

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 09:12:03 2014 No.410036 File: 209 KB, 800x600, hh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>410034 can anyone tell me weather or not i clothes should be attached to bones in the rig or will the physics in the cloth modifier be able to take care of it?

Anonymous Sat Feb 15 09:35:33 2014 No.410041

>>410006

Its cute and has potential.
1. Unwrap it, put some color on it (diffuse/self-illumination for body, reflective/refractive/glow material for the eyes)
2. Place the character in a scene (gloss/reflective ground, tiled background), 2 point lighting, global illumination, and apply some depth of field,
3. Make the flame as one object with fresnel and glow.
4. Add a vignette in post production and you're done.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 09:39:03 2014 No.410042 >>408343 only thing to make this better would be an ovipositor

Anonymous Sat Feb 15 09:50:34 2014 No.410045

>>409952
So is my sculpt anatomically incorrect or did i exaggerate few forms ? Eh ?
And i sculpt that way since im lazy, and if werent lazy, i bet i could fine someone with highly developed lower trap muscles.

>>409960
you mean the files ?
I dont have them, i took the image from their site from the shop area.
If you want the all sides view of this scan i can upload it.

>>409974
>i am no way a pro at anatomy
no shit
>, notably with the angle of scapula that is completely horizontal
its not
>deltopectoral triangle shape is messed up
not really
>symmetrical abs
i got symmetrical abs, am i anatomically incorrect ?
>. Pillar of mouth looks retrded with mentolabial sulcus way to close to lip.
now you are saying he is ugly, which has no relevance to the topic at hand

As for the lower abs, i agree, the problem of working first on the back then on the front with hands in the way.

And yeah, i think you are full of crap.
>>409987
Half the in this whole image is you want me to change his muscle mass in some areas, there you arent actually pointing out anatomical mistakes, you are telling me he should look different.

Few of your points are wrong, like the paint over of clavicular head of the pecs, the weird bottom of the feet comment, or the fact the way bottom of the pecs connect to the ribcage varies a lot in people, or your paint over of back lines.

Rest i agree, i made the feet way too skinny, and the forehead seems a bit big, and the spine is skewed.

But why do you feel the need to mix in stupid personal preference with your anatomical crits just to make it seem you have more to say is beyond me.

Anonymous Sat Feb 15 09:55:33 2014 No.410046
File: 208 KB, 1935x811, all day bro 2222.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Bottom like i didnt claim this model is perfect, even i can see right away few huge mistakes i made, but i just love how you hacks make things up since you cant actually spot them and criticize the model in a proper way. And i didnt see any of you pointing anything out when i was posting wips here like 3 months ago, guess what, that would be much more help.
As is, im happy with this for a 1 day sculpt.

As a bonus here is comparison to some more 3d scan pics from ten24 for those who claim his anatomy makes no sense, and before "lol they dont look alike" its not the person i used as ref for my model, but it proves a point.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 10:39:24 2014 No.410048 File: 205 KB, 800x600, fdgh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>410036

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 10:46:54 2014 No.410049 File: 153 KB, 800x600, ll.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>410048 legs

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 10:57:26 2014 No.410052 File: 129 KB, 800x600, kjhlj.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>410049

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 10:58:26 2014 No.410053 File: 128 KB, 800x600, ffff.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>410052

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 11:18:30 2014 No.410055 >>410046 Someone's mad.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 13:09:35 2014 No.410061 >>410045 please die

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 13:13:37 2014 No.410063 >>410045 "Im lazy....if i werent lazy...i bet if i could" Blah blah blah - always with the "if's". You're pathetic.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 13:55:34 2014 No.410068 >>410045 >i got symmetrical abs, am i anatomically incorrect ? Pics or never happened.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 15:38:39 2014 No.410077 >>408313 your skill is good but the design is a absolutely disgusting.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 16:12:34 2014 No.410083 >>410041 Alright I only know how to model at this point. This was my new years resolution. Im going to learn how uv right now!

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 17:47:30 2014 No.410099 File: 688 KB, 1920x1080, j1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sat Feb 15 17:49:30 2014 No.410100
File: 602 KB, 1600x1054, venom_by_nebezial.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>410045
>i exaggerated a few forms
>it's still anatomically correct tho!!1!!

<also just a few exaggerated forms, but still really, like, anatomically correct, right?

mad/10, stop posting anytime

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 17:50:30 2014 No.410101 File: 859 KB, 1920x1080, j2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>410099 LF lighting and grunge texturing tips

Anonymous Sat Feb 15 18:23:21 2014 No.410110

>>410045
You don't get it do you?

what we meant is to

FIND A FUCKING PERSON AND SCULPT HIM/HER/IT.

you used drawn and multiple references, when in reality, you should've just find a real life person that fits the description of your character, take several photo of him/her/it nude, and use those as reference for that character you're creating. It's hard, but essential to be an advanced visual artist. You'll never have an anatomically correct person from anything else but a naked human being.

TL;DR: COME BACK WHEN YOU COMPLETED LIFE DRAWING/SCULPTING CLASS YOU FAGGOT.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 19:18:28 2014 No.410116 >>410101 Very nice, my only advice is to work with your normals/specularity a wee bit more.

Anonymous Sat Feb 15 19:20:28 2014 No.410117
File: 2.81 MB, 359x322, movementRevisions.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>408285
Is anyone here willing to take me on as an animation apprentice?

I'm making a game, along with my own animations, but I'm having some trouble with certain animations, and I'd like to learn in general from someone who's possibly been in the industry/gone to school for this stuff. Seeing as I've only been animating for two months now, I could really use the tips.

Animations in particular that give me trouble are running cycles and flips. You can see what I mean in this GIF, as the sprint seems really slippery.

My Skype is SkyAphid, please contact me on there. I'd like to be able to talk in a realtime environment.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 19:22:28 2014 No.410118 >>410117 the animation is well done, but could you show us a slow mo of it so that we can nitpick it. NB4 "It's shit"

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 19:24:28 2014 No.410119 >>410117 the animation is well done, but could you show us a slow mo of it so that we can nitpick it. NB4 "It's shit"

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 20:05:23 2014 No.410123 >>410116

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 20:06:23 2014 No.410124 >>410116 thanks, ive gotten that comment before, any particular areas strike you as wrong and what i can work on? >>410119 he's/she's right, looks good imo! is it easier or harder to animate transitions for fast mouvments than slower ones?

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 20:54:41 2014 No.410125 File: 897 KB, 1920x1080, feedback.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>410124

Anonymous Sat Feb 15 20:56:42 2014 No.410126

>>410101
The model and the texture don't fit together. If you were to take the texture away there'd be nothing besides the roof telling you that the car is banged up or worn out. The model is almost like a new car while the texture is for a car that has been rusting away in a dump for years.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 15 22:15:12 2014 No.410131 >>410125 nice, gonna be banging it up more as i go, i was more worried about shading and texture and needed to experiment with that. still not as easy to break things than make them look new

Anonymous Sat Feb 15 23:22:25 2014 No.410138
File: 1.28 MB, 1920x1080, 1392504646140.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>410101
Hope it helps, m8.

I mostly agree with >>410125, except for the consistent spec, and don't apply postprocessing effects like DoF until your texture is what you want it to be.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 16 02:13:01 2014 No.410160 >>410138 cool shit, thanks m8

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 16 07:30:41 2014 No.410195 >>410100 >made up character >too muscular commend yourself for not being able to make even a simple comparison

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 16 16:54:07 2014 No.410239 File: 182 KB, 1123x1189, C3PO_render1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I know it's not objectively good render, but I find it interesting.

Anonymous Mon Feb 17 19:58:05 2014 No.410403
File: 148 KB, 774x569, 1392685087351.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Trying out hand painted textures. The wood is pretty shady, I might rework it later.

Any suggestions? I don't really like how to spikes came out, maybe the base color is too dark.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 17 22:26:24 2014 No.410417 >>410239 Learn about 3 point lighting, nigga.

Anonymous Mon Feb 17 22:46:23 2014 No.410421

Ignore this nigga >>410417.

What you need to do is lighten up those shadows by adding a light on the right. Furthermore, If you want to step you game up, like a true OG, you need to add a strong light behind c3po to act as a rim light. You then need to create more contrast between your figure and its background. You can do this in 2 ways:

1) Vignette effect on background with c3po masked out ( pro status)
2) Create a large plane behind c3po with the colored desire and light that bitch up with an upwards spot light (lowly-bitch status)

You're welcome, young blood.

Anonymous Mon Feb 17 22:52:26 2014 No.410423

>>410421
>What you need to do is lighten up those shadows by adding a light on the right. Furthermore, If you want to step you game up, like a true OG, you need to add a strong light behind c3po to act as a rim light. You then need to create more contrast between your figure and its background.

What, nigga? That IS 3 point lighting.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 17 22:55:26 2014 No.410424 >>410421 boy, you be trippin. Most likely bait, but for everyone else, what he described is exactly what 3 point lighting is.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 18 02:02:20 2014 No.410440 >348 >104 Remember when we'd hit the image limit long before we'd ever reach the bump limit? Is it only a few people that post wips while everyone else offers shitty advice?

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 18 14:38:45 2014 No.410508 >>410423 >>410424 Yall some illiterate-ass niggas.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 18 17:58:12 2014 No.410540 >>410440 If that's the case, I made a new thread with some rules: >>410539

Anonymous Wed Feb 19 16:32:08 2014 No.410742
File: 210 KB, 2100x821, dreadtest.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

This is kinda just a quick version I did to get ideas on paper so to speak, heavily based on the Dreadnoughts from WH40k, total noob at modelling so any constructive crit's more than welcome

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 19 16:33:08 2014 No.410743 >>410742 Oh yeah ignore the exhausts that's a super old version that looked wank it looks not-awful now

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 12:16:57 2014 No.412208 >>408877 Millenia, when will you texture a gun that looks new and nice rather than old and ready to be trashmanned

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 13:07:08 2014 No.412216 >>412208 This, the old/weathered weapon look is so 2012.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/3/ - 3DCG