[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/3/ - 3DCG


View post   

File: 54 KB, 782x1096, 1531032004636.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
631748 No.631748 [Reply] [Original]

Can't do this in Blender!

>> No.631751

What do you mean? Grainy renders are Cycles forte.

>> No.631752

>>631751
Ice cold.

>> No.631753

looks like ur mom lmao

>> No.631759

>has science gone to far? Y/N

>> No.631760

>>631759
>[x] Make it go farther

>> No.631762
File: 720 KB, 1401x1458, bodied.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
631762

>>631751

>> No.631787

muh dick
OwO

>> No.631789

>>631753
God I wish

>> No.631793

>>631748
Yes you can, and it would look less grainy since cycles has a denoiser.

>> No.631808

>>631793
That denoiser is crap, though.

>> No.631810

>>631808
I thought it was fine to use it if you have enough samples first?

>> No.631811

Dude, just give it tits. There's no point in it having lumps on its chest if they aren't tits

>> No.631819

>>631811
lizard tits make people really angry

>> No.631825

>>631751
>>631793
It's not even noise. It's just a fine detail map. If you look closely, you can tell that they're supposed to be scales. The compression ruins the fuck out of the image either way though.

>>631808
Yeah, it tends to be. You still have to render at a decently high number of samples to get a usable result, and you might as well not even use it if you have glass in your scene (something something cycles can't do caustics). It does help to cut down on render times by around a quarter to a half most of the time though.

>> No.631833

>>631751
>>631752
>>631762
>/3/tards can't tell the difference between compression artifacts and noise
It's time to give up.

>> No.631842

>>631808
Tell me about it. I try using it with CPU, and it crashes my monitor every time.

Haven't even tried it with GPU.

>> No.631850

>>631842
denoiser with gpu is legit. you can clean up renders without going up in samples

>> No.631929
File: 202 KB, 365x363, 1530547718913.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
631929

>>631842
Have you tried fixing your computer?

>> No.631933
File: 103 KB, 800x450, 129735795.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
631933

>>631748
Well shit, at least now I know what a female Bowser Jr would look like.

>> No.631935
File: 741 KB, 782x1096, Rafaknight.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
631935

You people are so fucking easily mislead

>> No.631950

>>631935
Very cool.

>> No.632007

>koopadonutwearingacrown.jpg

>> No.632040

>>631929
If this is that stupid system32 thing forget it. I ain't killing my machine

If not, then fuck if I know what to do. All I can do is see if I can get a graphics card or more RAM.

>> No.632045

>>632040
>If this is that stupid system32 thing forget it.
Well the good news is that I've identified what's causing the problem.

>> No.632075
File: 241 KB, 782x1096, edit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
632075

>>631935
I tried.

>> No.632081

So apparently furries are officially allowed now on /3/?

>> No.632100
File: 54 KB, 830x857, KoopaPeach step one.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
632100

Aww, is this a challenge thread?
Cool! Let´s all make a Koopa Peach and animate looots of pornographic lewds for everybody on /3/!

>> No.632107

>>632081
Peach is not furry.

>> No.632109

>>632075
Why would part of her shell have nipples on it?

>> No.632112

>>632100
Good work, anon.
>>632109
To succ.

>> No.632164

LIZARDS DO NOT HAVE BREASTS.

>> No.632183

>>631819

There we go: >>632164

>> No.632185

>>632164
This is a chimera, you mongo.

>> No.632193

>>631751
*dabs*

>> No.632316
File: 117 KB, 1100x836, over.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
632316

This meme is now officially over.

>> No.632322

>>632316
That is not 3D.

Pleas delet.

>> No.632417

>>632316
Remake the scene in 3D, you can get a Kirby model from themodelsresource (if you're worried about accuracy as opposed to making your own pink sphere with shoes)

>> No.632428
File: 69 KB, 396x428, my-boner-is-confused.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
632428

>>631748
I came to /3/ for amazing artwork, not to question my sexuality

>> No.632445

>>632428
>came to /3/ for amazing artwork
that's a first

>> No.632499

>>632428
>I came to /3/ for amazing artwork
lmao

>> No.632901

Well? Did you blendlets give up already or something?
You are now ready to submit before your Zbrush wielding masters, yes?

>> No.632902

>>632901
as long as your'e here, we will be here to check your behavior.

>> No.632904

>>632902
Shouldn't you be checking your ray clamping values instead?

>> No.632921
File: 77 KB, 599x545, 1279988784001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
632921

>>632904
I checked your mom instead but she was too fat

>> No.632931
File: 14 KB, 279x229, 1389749608453.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
632931

>>632921
thats a really dope comeback if you're in 2nd grade

>> No.632932

>>632931
Noone ever said 4chan was home to the smartest bunch. Autistic and a bunch of losers? yes, but not smart.

>> No.632937

>>632931
>>632932
Greetings, my fellow Redditors!

>> No.632944

I come to /3/ for this high quality posting that you just can't find anywhere else on the internet.
Truly, this is the high-class of intellectual posting.

>> No.632945

I'd fuck that tortle

>> No.633080

>>631748
>Can't do this in Blender!
wtf i love blender now

>> No.633107
File: 559 KB, 1892x995, girlcoopa.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
633107

I'll give it a shot.

>> No.633113

>>633107
What's the addon on the left?

>> No.633126
File: 1.73 MB, 1080x1920, bowlette.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
633126

>>633113
which?

>> No.633141
File: 2 KB, 119x125, 1503442890238.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
633141

>>633126
so much fucking cringe

>> No.633144

>>633126
I'ts looking good anon, keep at it

>> No.633146

>>633126
all
>>633126
dyntopo or no

>> No.633156

>>632428
so are you a faggot or a dyke?

>> No.633161

>>633126
So... how’s it coming along

>> No.633270
File: 608 KB, 1920x1080, MWATT_PREV_04.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
633270

Oh, I stopped. I got other stuff to do.

>> No.633271

>>633146
I use hard ops, box cutter, mesh machine, hair tool, retopoflow, speedsculpt (pictured), blend4web, pro lighting studio, and the radeon renderer.

>> No.633326

>>633271
Thanks for responding, I'll get those soon as

>> No.633327

>>631748
He finally fucked the Peach, eh? Good genes, good genes.

>> No.633349

>>633327
Happened literally decades ago. She's between 20 and 30 now

>> No.633365

>>633349
So Koopa is a pedo?

>> No.633368

>>633365
isn't the OP supposed to be their offspring?

>> No.633369
File: 125 KB, 800x371, 1531554939078.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
633369

>>633368
Ah that would make sense. I'm not 100% up to date on the lore.

>> No.633380
File: 33 KB, 339x793, Koopeach appears.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
633380

>>632100
Here she is, Anons.
Koopeach will live incredible adventures as a completely still image rendered once for this thread and completely forgotten for years until the Zbrush file is irremediably deleted by a windows crash or somesuch.
Please enjoy.

>> No.633383

>>633380
i don't think she has the body of a russian Olympian swimmer

>> No.633409

>>633380
What do you have against necks?

>> No.633420

>>633380
I really appreciate the effort and she's cute but she also looks HILARIOUSLY stunned like... as if she's watching a video of how Koopa "met" her mom

>> No.633424

>>633380
Holy shit.
>>632021
It's fucking you again.
Goddammit.

>> No.633454

>>633424
I fucking hate this guy cant model for shit and keeps fucking posting here

>> No.633480

>>633454
>I fucking hate this guy cant model for shit and keeps fucking posting here
You could model better and post, why aren´t you?

>> No.633482

>>631793

>mistaking jpeg artifacting for noise

>> No.633498

>>633454
I wouldn't say he can't model for shit. He just has a deeply unpleasant style.

>> No.633505

>>633498
His inability to do anything but that deeply unpleasant style makes him a bad modeller.

>> No.633543

>>631748
why are you doing this

what's wrong with a normal naked lady

>> No.633589

>>633380
This looks like a Spore creature

>> No.633590

>>633498
everything he makes is blob monster garbage with no definition of form.

>> No.633616

>>633590
>>633505
>>633498
I have fans here?

>> No.633624

>>633380
It looks like her ribcage is somehow over her tits. Compare to OP where it's much smoother and softer looking.

>> No.633718

>>633616
No, this is an intervention. You have technically proficient skills, you just hide behind a shit aesthetic in an attempt to evade criticism (possibly from yourself).
It's like when someone draws something "as a joke" but really they're trying to show off their skill but they're also trying to deflect any criticism by saying "it's just a joke".
It's also a lot like when someone posts their work and say s"This is my first model" or "I've only been doing 3d for [a few weeks / a month / some other short period of time]"

Get help Anon. Maybe model some normal real life shit, then some real humans off 3d.sk or the like, and THEN revisit your stylized aesthetic

>> No.633923
File: 71 KB, 681x824, Whysoserious.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
633923

>>633718
No.
She´s stays like that.
Kiss it.

>> No.633954

>>633718
For all we know, he's probably "made it" and works for high end movie studios and does this shit to trigger us.

All his shit looks like some deformed 1950's ass shit.

Does anyone know if that one dude who used to make those uncanny ass animal girls is still on /3/? Alioto or something?

>> No.633964

>>633923
I'm kinda tempted to ask for the model file to see if rendering it with proper materials would make a difference. I'd think not due to how exaggerated your texturing style is, but who knows.

>> No.633996

>>633954
>and does this shit to trigger us
Why would anybody in those circumstances do something like that?

>> No.634003

>>633380
>>633923
Protip: There's literally no AO baked or handrawn in the OP model

>> No.634019

>>633923
do her tits have a ribcage?

>> No.634020

More big boob

>> No.634028
File: 19 KB, 272x272, 1515032880409.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
634028

>>631751
o lol

>> No.634029

>>634020
unzip bob and vagene

>> No.634039

>>633996
Not enough free time to do anything else but churn out shitty models in 15mins.
Instant laughs and a slow burn later on when more people show up to "marvel" at his work.

>> No.634053

>>634039
>and a slow burn later on when more people show up to "marvel" at his work.
Imagine doing that for so long, going so deep down the rabbit hole, that you start to question whether your true, highest art, is the one you do for AAA studios, or the one you make to troll teh boards with.

And, one day, you decide your true art is the latter. You quit your job, you take a dump on Epic Games hall, you decide to go home, and start focusing on your True character art. "They dumped all those fucking models on the web, but fuck them, fuck Paragon, that is just shit for the masses, and I've got enough of that crap," you think on your way home.

Perhaps he is not trolling. Perhaps the trolling is in the past. Perhaps that is his true art.

>> No.634055

>>634053
>Perhaps that is his true art.
trolling is a art

>> No.634066

>>634029
Expand bobs